This is one of the more silly arguments on this site. There's a lot more nuance than "purist's" will acknowledge.

Funny, in a sad way, that we collectively argue over such silliness rather than what is meant by what is written.

#13

Don't forget paternalistic.

Whatever, I don't get it, the latinx, latino naming conventions. We have 2 grandchildren and four great grandchildren that are TexMex. None of those terms are something that has come up in any conversation at any family function.

#8

A classic exposition of deflection.

What those subjects have to do with the potential criminality of the Buffoon's administration is nothing.

Deflection at it's base.

The SCOTUS has no right nor power to find a legally-passed congressional law unconstitutional unless it violates the actual Constitution ...

From which enumerated power does this statutory right to abortion emanate? The commerce clause? The general welfare clause? I think both are pretty shaky.

Don't get me wrong. I would support but I'm just not as optimistic as you that it would pass muster.

Both sides are committed to total victory.

Now that you have identified a problem what's the solution?

One side seeks sovereign integrity while the other seeks sovereign domination.

How is that conundrum resolved? Integrity or domination?

insane. judge should not help them.

You misapprehend. He's not helping. He's boxing in, closing doors. Excellence.

Trump, being an officer ...

"Lawfare" offers a balanced analyses of the 11th Circuit Courts' opinion.

... otherwise it's a lot to throw away.

True but certainly not unheard of. Ginsberg and Jones Day rings a recent bell. That and the potential for great rewards.

Which brings up the $3M retainer. For the uninitiated, that money likely goes into a trust account according to relevant state bar rules. The money can only be withdrawn from that trust account in accord with the terms of a contract that complies with state bar rules. Iow, the lawyer didn't get that money deposited in his personal account to spend if, as and when he wishes.

"-------"

Interesting terminology. My first memory of the term is the 60's. My uncle was a DJ on the local country station (we had two, the other mostly did top 40). He did a morning show similar to today's morning radio. Just jokes, stupid stuff intermixed with news and music. He liked to bag on his advertisers.

One I remember is about the guys at the gas station just west of the railroad tracks on Bonham St. He bagged on them about whatever funny s**t and said they were "-------s". It was a joke. It did not have anything to do with race or ethnicity. It was a ---- joke.

2022? OMFG JHC OF GD HMFMOG Emoji Emoji Some stupid meme. OMFG JHC JHFC OGD WTF

Get over it. Sometimes it's just a joke, tighta**es.

#3

I'm aware of that. Does it sanction moving San Antonio, Texas aliens with FL tax dollars?

Worth saying twice. Again.

7 & 8

7 & 8

Common definition of Treason:

Is irrelevant.

This is not complicated.

... the statute being referred to is part of a post 9/11 law that gave the power to forgive loans during a dangerous crisis period, like another terrorist attack.

But to your point, as I noted in prior comments, a search is only "probable cause."

Not yet anywhere near, "beyond a reasonable doubt" for guilt.

True. Yet there's an intermediate step. Indictment, also a probable cause standard.

That's where the nuance kicks in.

Country Joe Mcdonald - Feel Like i'm Fixing to Die Rag - Woodstock '69

That one is probably obligatory.

I saw it performed live in Boulder. The headliners were Fleetwood Mac and Bob Seger.

The irony.

There were about 15,500 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election in Gillespie County.

The Buffoon got about 12,500 of those votes.

A formal request is required. The documents were seized by a search warrant issued by a court of law. The documents are in custodia legis, in custody of the law. A court order is required to release them from custody of the law.

The DOJ knows it can't retain attorney/client privileged documents. A DOJ filter team, segregated from the investigation, will review every document for potential attorney/client privilege. Some clearly will be, some clearly won't and some may or may not which will be decided by the judge. The Buffoon's lawyers know that. The media knows that. But them telling the public that doesn't create drama, tension, reaction.

Documents claimed to be executive privilege should be retained. Executive privilege is to protect communications to the president regarding the duties of his office. Communications, documents, regarding a president's duties are government records, property of the United States. The filter team will do that diligence also. Most if not all such claims should be denied. See again the last three sentences of the second paragraph.

I read the search warrant.
It reads like something out of a movie.

No it's reality. The warrant ticks all the boxes. That's all it's required to do.

The questions are who, what, when, where, why. That's in the underlying evidence. The affidavit. You're not likely to see that.