It is concerning that political appointees of the Buffoon are willing to engage in revenge prosecutions.

More concerning to me is there are front line DOJ lawyers willing to advance this s**t.

I'd guess before June.

Another Buffoon DOJ crash and burn in the waiting. It's coming.

SPLC not disclosing it's means and methods of f*****g over racists is a fraud upon donor's that wanted to f**k over racists? I'm sure the donors are devastated to learn this insignificant information.

Frickin' journalists' and their editors. Just say what happened and avoid the bs.

No, the judge did not allow Comey to bring her suit. She done done that and it don't take a judge to do it. What happened is the court denied the government's motion to dismiss. A routine happening that means the case continues forward as would have happened without the motion to dismiss.

That and just another, becoming routine, Buffoon DOJ crash and burn. Read the article for their dumba**ery.

This not some grand victory. It's a procedural ruling that holds the status quo while the court decides the merits.

I'm guessing about 6-8 weeks before this one is also dismissed.

#2 Posted by ClownShack

Pretend otherwise, if you wish, but this person is a citizen. Until a court revokes the fraudulently obtained citizenship this person is and remains a citizen.

Thanks Laura, some are too obtuse to be tolerated.

"FBI Director Patel Sues the Atlantic Magazine for Defamation"

Good luck with that.

Jesus F****** Christ, it is appalling how stupid some can be.

The point of this thread is how desensitized people have become.

The point of my post was to mock, ridicule and in any way possible make fun of sensitives, such as you, offended by irreverent jokes about politicians on a TV show that has been doing exactly that for fifty f****** years.

Now, what other stupid you want to be slapped about?

TACO Tuesday. The Buffoon caves again.

Don't get me wrong. Anything that slows, stops or interferes with the Buffoon throwing of billions of dollars at dirt in Iran in OK with me.

It's just the theater is so f****** comical. Perhaps SNL should do a skit.

Seriously? An SNL audience laughed at an innocuous joke about a politician "attending the theater?"

Well f*** me. Fifty years on and I never thought that would happen.

I mean g** d***, when did SNL become so irreverent?

Objective truth? Are you s******g me. The objective truth is the Buffoon said he has air superiority over Iran. Then an F15 and an A10 are downed and two helicopters hit by Iran air defense. So what's the objective truth, what you see or what it says?

Oh, and what's flying out to where "the pilot was" gonna do? Nothing. Why search on foot? That's where the person is, dummy. A ground operation is what extracted this person.

I'm thrilled this soldier was rescued. Do I believe the soaring rhetoric of the Buffoon administration about it, nope. I'll wait for the future anonymous reports of the persons actually involved.

Strange that one would sacrifice their reputation, assets and soul at the alter of a Buffoon. Then I wonder if the Mayor was all that he was made up to be. Was he just a pre-buffoon?

Vulgar. Garish. I don't know what other words to apply to this Buffoon abomination.

What does it matter? He was a grown a** f****** man. A retired g** d*** three star f****** general. He was not some hapless sod beset by those above him.

Irrespective of any interview, he was charged. He retained counsel. Counsel negotiated a plea. That plea was in writing. He sat down and read that plea. Then he signed that plea. Then the plea was filed with the court. Then a plea hearing was set for a later date. On that date he stood in open court admitted voluntarily signing the plea, admitted the facts set forth in the plea and admitted that he was guilty. Then a sentencing hearing was set for a later date. On that date he stood in open court and admitted voluntarily signing the plea, admitted the facts set forth in the plea and admitted he was guilty. He had every opportunity to say no, but he didn't. He said I'm guilty.

Then the grown a** f****** retired three star general wanted to backtrack giving your excuses. Didn't work. Then the Buffoon gave the criminal a pardon. Then he sues. Then the Buffoon gives him a 1.26M dollar settlement from our money. And here we are.

What else is there to know about the particular grift?

What more niggling excuses will you make for this grown a** guilty as f*** retired three star general?

You don't get it.

Flynn is guilty as f***. No court, including the USSC, has ruled otherwise, not even close. The unproven after the fact whining changes nothing. The Buffoon TACO'd again because it could not accept that the Biden administration was correct. It cost us 1.25M. Shame.

#8. It was a perjury trap, moron. He wasn't even being 8nvestigsted for a crime. He was set up and then subjected to lawfare.

Then why did he plead guilty? Twice. If what you postulate is true then take it to trial. Truth. Justice. And the American way.

But he didn't. Instead, he sat down with his lawyers and examined line by line a long and detailed plea agreement. It explained in detail what he was charged with, the facts he admitted true that support his beyond a reasonable doubt guilt and that his plea and signature is without intimidation or coercion. Then he admitted in open court, twice, a few months apart that he voluntarily signed the agreement and that he is guilty as charged. Then the Buffoon gave him a pardon.

Then he sued for wrongful prosecution. Then the district and appellate court said, you gotta be kidding, you didn't fight it, plead guilty and the pardon is irrelevant. The Supreme court ducks the issues and rule proceduraly, standing.

So, in the face of a strong defense against the case the Buffoon caves. It cost us 1.25M. Why?

Don't be so quick to assume there won't be problems showing up in the future with mail-in ballots that bring it's reliability into question.

Then perhaps you could point out the problems with the collective 56 years of experience of all mail balloting of CO, WA and OR.

I setup accounting systems and as experienced as I was, inevitably all these people using the system found some way to create problems.

So despite your best effort to fulfill your duty to establish systems and protocols to prevent such problems, factors beyond your control or contemplation defeated your effort.

Why do you think elections officials aren't in the same boat?

I did not post this to start a flame war, which is where that post will lead, over the ins and outs of the Mueller reports.

I posted this because its about the situation that exists today, right now, in the oval office from truths revealed by Mueller.

Most salient, ... the president and the people around him behave like gangsters. ...

That's the point. Not minutia.

The enduring truths, emphasis original:

The first enduring truth of the Mueller Report is that the Russians conducted a significant "active measures" operation on a variety of social media platforms to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The second enduring truth of the Mueller Report is that Russian military intelligence, in addition to the active measures, also conducted a campaign of hacking emails associated with the Democratic campaign and dumping them into the public domain.

The third enduring truth of the Mueller Report is that there were repeated and extensive contacts between Russian entities purporting to represent the government and officials of the Trump campaign.

Finally ... That truth is that ... the president and the people around him behave like gangsters. ...

Don't knee-jerk. This is a typical Lawfare deep dive.

... what is the point of this ruling. [sic]

It's not a "ruling." It's a Consent Decree. More commonly known as a settlement agreement. As is common with settlements there is no admission of the factual or legal basis for the claims or positions of the parties. It applies to no one else. It can only be enforced by the named parties. It establishes no precedent.

17. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement is entered into solely for the purpose of settling and compromising any remaining claims in this action without further litigation, and, except as stated explicitly in the text of the Agreement, it shall not be construed as evidence or as an admission regarding any issues of law or fact, or regarding the truth or validity of any allegation or claim raised in this action or in any other action.