#3

What if you and your authoritarian pals go f*** yourselves.

How folk transact their necessary business is not for your voyeurism. Try learning what the First and Fourth Amendments have to say about your desired perversion.

I grew up in NE Texas, third county to the left. My Dad's older sister, born and grew up in the same county, was married to an Army officer. They spent quite a bit of time in VA. When they came home they had noticeably different accents.

Over the course of my career, I've spoken with I don't know how many thousand people. I've noticed an homogenization of the accent and dialects of urban persons. I don't know how many times someone has commented on my NE Texas accent which I consider mild by local country standards.

Iran has prepared for this shooting conflict since Carter. The US has not.

Obama tried for a peaceful solution, with limited success, but the Buffoon Buffooned that.

So, here we are spending billions blowing up s*** that won't make any difference in the end.

American foreign policy in the hands of a Buffoon.

#3

I highly doubt that. I spent basically 3 years playing with M1091A1s, a self propelled version of the towed 105mm weapon described in the article. The firing rate of a six gun battery in those years may have reached several hundred on a typical training mission a few times a year. No where enough to hit a million a day.

That said a 155 round alone is basically inert. It has no way to detonate without a fuse. In my day there were three fuses, PD, timed and proximity. PD, point detonating, goes off when it hits something. Timed goes of at a set time, fixed at the gun, after firing. Proximity goes off at a set distance from impact, basically determined by radar from the fuse. I'm sure technology now provides methods I'm not aware of. Nevertheless my point remains the same.

There is no explanation for a round exploding mid-flight as the investigation finds. Was it wise to shoot rounds over an interstate highway? No. Is there an explanation for the detonation? No. Do soldiers need live fire training? Of course. How is this incident prevented? Point West instead of East.

#13

Got anything more credible than a social media post from "Apple Lamps?" If not, I'll stick with the Independent's article.

If these lawyers want their state licenses, needed after their DOJ position ends, they must deal with their state bar.

There is nothing feds in general, and bondi in particular, can do to change that.

That didn't age well.

#99

The posture, the tone, the pace, it just drips of narcissism and self aggrandizement. And I only watched about 3 minutes, I can only imagine how embarrassing for the country the rest has been.

Jeez, I just watched about 3 minutes of this s***. There's not enough mind bleach ...

Voter fraud happens. It happens with both parties. Laws address it's miniscuity. It's not a problem. Get over it.

I don't see a link to the documents but neither am I seeing anything nefarious. Rules of civil procedure, both state and federal, provide for requests for discovery from third parties then there's the administrative requests. Those requests are generally considered as subpoenas.

Making them stick is another story.

... few percent is all that is required to swing many elections, ...

I don't think data upholds that. That aside, the concerns you voice are general. They exist without this stupid.

My guess? It's gonna TACO. Again.

#17

I'm not seeing the confusion and suppression. I foresee the Buffoon signing something, the courts stopping it and normal voting processes proceed.

What do you see that foresee that leads to confusion and suppression?

The probability to this coming to fruition is somewhere between zero and none. Calm down. Breathe.

For the vast majority of history, the concept of a nation/state did not exist.

What? You're gonna have to flesh that one out a bit. Start with Rome.

#18

It's behind a f*****g paywall, idgit. When will you learn this? The f*****g WSJ is f*****g paywalled. This ain't the first time you pulled this s**t.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

... blithering idiot ...

FTFM

#27

What? You live in a f*****g cave?

Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls. The remaining 14 states and Washington, D.C., use other methods to verify the identity of voters. Most frequently, other identifying information provided at the polling place, such as a signature, is checked against information on file. See NCSL'sVoter Verification Without ID Documents.