#8

After the ellipses, I would add "anytime soon."

I still have faith.

Don't get excited about this. The Buffoon's "most transparent administration, EVAH" has taken an aggressive legal stance regarding immunity. Particularly "deliberative process." It thinks that includes the Buffoon's clods off the street not just administration employees. It'll push "I don't have to" to the limit.

Bet on it.

I was enrolled in the ABA as a law student. After licensing I paid for my continued membership for several years. Until its journal became a social issue publication. I'm forking over money for a publication about practicing law not about social issues. I cancelled my subscription years ago.

I thought the courts job was to decide constitutionality?

Yes, when that issue is before the Court. Here it was not. The issue was whether to stay an injunction while litigation proceeded below. The Court said yes. The Constitution played no role.

Remember, Article III jurisdiction, "cases and controversies," is broader than just the Constitution.

"... dominance."

In what reality does a 5% or less voting demographic assert political dominance? Is it DSA? Transgender? LGBTQ... alphabet soup? Nazis? Liberals? Progressives? Which one or more asserts dominance. Not airwaves. Political dominance? Which one or more?

Meanwhile, back at the ranch.

You're missing the nuance. It doesn't mean the ice idiot can't be extradited. It means Texas law only allows 90 days detention pending extradition--times up he's out Thursday.

Now hot wheels gets to continue his farce of investigating extradition eligibility which the judge so far finds "not in bad faith." Meaning he's not hung himself, yet.

So, hang in there, the fat lady ain't sang yet.

Why do you salivate so much over your government indiscriminately murdering people in international waters?

The Buffoon "might"...

Yeah, good luck wit' dat.

#3

I agree but that fails to account for absence of why.

I'm out for a week for an out of town long trip (for our 46th anniversary) to a deceased friend's rural home now owned by her daughter that we've known since her birth.

#51 Then the author(s) should have accounted for that variable.

Okay, how about flock introduce a code change that automatically deletes any image after 24 hours? If necessary Congress require it.

The article touches on all but one of WWWWW journalism standards. Why?

Where does the article attempt to explain why senior officers failed to perform there fundamental duty to their subordinates? Kinda important information doncha think?

Good idea. But I don't trust the Buffoon to use it for any thing other than another cover up.

Anyone that supports this is an ignorant idiot with no clue. The judges' order is crystal clear and only four pages.

#5 Posted by visitor

You were present at the convention?

Impeach this ----------- now

Why? I support removing the Buffoon by any legal means. These actions appear to be legitimate security measures. Because you are a hysterical little b***h is not one of those.

Dang it didn't. Here's the search terms: percentage of eligible muslim voters in the US

... They will hang you both from a crane like ornaments when they take over...

The probability of that actually happening (Muslims taking over the US) is somewhere between zero and none.

If you disagree then you're a political science imbecile. There two decisive factors in that happening. Total US Muslim population and total percentage of eligible Muslim voter. There's also Muslim voter turnout but that is unknown until the issue (Muslim take over of the US) is on the ballot.