None of this can be implemented, yet. However, look at it like this. Often times litigants and courts have to speculate about the practical effects of new laws. No need for speculation here, the Buffoon laid all the horribles out for God and everybody to see. You can bet that litigants and court will be paying attention.

Makes me wonder if that was Robert's thought in letting the planning go forward.

#27 | Posted by oneironaut

"Strictly opt-in[,]" nope. There my interest ends. If you are stupid enough to opt-in then you deserve any bad effects.

Recently a contractor for my medicare advantage plan sent sent me a completed VA release for all my medical records. I chuckled as I threw it in the trash can. It was the second one. The result will be the same for any in the future.

#1

Nope, state charge.

Simmer down! The term "tape" in the article is likely used loosely or colloquially to refer to the surveillance footage or recording of Epstein's prison cell.

That would be my guess too but, according to the copy of the article shown in the video at 1 (about 4+ minutes in), the article doesn't use the word "tape." That and Bondi makes it d**n clear it's digital video. Also whoever heard of a VCR that could record round the clock. That would be a huge tape whereas my memory is they maxed out at about 2 hours.

Posted by Visitor

You're sure doing a lot of shucking and jiving to contradict Bondi. See #125

VCR's d**n sure ain't rebooted which Bondi says is the cause of the gap.

There are no missing minutes on the tape.

Oops, badly misread the question. Nevertheless there's another obvious answer. Whatever misconduct the Bufoon may have engaged in during his Epstein years happened long ago. Can you say "statute of limitations?"

"Assuming Trump is implicated in the files - why didn't the Biden DoJ/FBI prosecute him for it?

JFC. You've asked this stupid question about a half a dozen times and are apparently to dumb to figure out the glaringly obvious answer. Epstein died about 18 months before Biden to office. You can't prosecute dead people. At least, not in this country.

I've chewed my fingernails all my life. Had asthma early on, grew out of it before 1st grade. Not allergic to anything I know of. Strong immune system. Rarely get sick.

This topic ain't even worthy for another 12 to 18 months.

#13

... shipped straight to their front door.

Well, if anyone deserves to be fired for total incompetence, it is her.

You base that conclusion on what? Her being assigned high profile cases like Epstein, Maxwell and Sean Combs? Her being appointed chief of Violent and Organized Crime Unit? That kind of incompetence?

Idiot.

#66 Nobody can even define what that means as it pertains to deportation. They aren't being tried for a crime. They are being deported.

Yes deportation is a civil proceeding. Due process at its base is "notice" and "opportunity to be heard." The concept does not differ based on the dichotomy.

That said, the Buffoon and goons, got caught giving no notice much less an opportunity to be heard. When called out, i.e. injunctions, the Buffoon and goons, tried an hour or so notice, in non-native language, much less an opportunity to be heard.

Judges appointed by both parties have condemned and enjoined this bull***t and mostly required 72hrs notice. The Buffoon and goons response, I read a headline today they're gonna give 6hrs notice. In court time that's no notice much less opportunity to be heard.

Another thing, the Buffoon and goons complain about the length of deportation proceedings. Those are administrative agency proceedings. The Buffoon is firing immigration judges while bi****g about delay.

#1

Where do you get this cockamamie s**t? Fetal person-hood only exists as a fiction created by statute in a few states. I'm not aware of any court upholding the standing of a fetus to sue.

#7

Al Green is an idiot. I say that not from media exposure but from personal experience. He was a JP court judge with jurisdiction over evictions. Early in my career I did a lot of foreclosures which led to lot of evictions. I've dealt with Al Green. He's a dogmatic pain in the a**.

Why should medical doctors be reading legal documents? Are they lawyers?

Excuse me. These are professionals granted a licensed privilege. Expecting them to know the basic parameters of practicing of their profession is not unreasonable. Their professional associations should by educating. I'm sure they are.

Mine does.

#65 | Posted by BillJohnson

Your ignorance of the law is no excuse. Officially, i.e legally, finding that the Buffoon engaged in insurrection does not require a criminal court. The USSC ruling was about who decides qualification not who decides the predicate facts.

The court did not reach some of the other issues that Trump had urged them to decide in his brief on the merits " such as whether Trump "engaged in insurrection" on Jan. 6.