"it has as much validity as this."

Really? How many Pulitzer Prizes had it won?

" The fact that you mention shirts with '86/46' proves you already understand what '86' implies."

The fact 86/46 doesn't upset you as much as 86/47, proves you're a partisan hack.

" Clinton deporting millions"

Back home, or to a third-world gulag?

There's a YUUUGE difference.

Here's our chance to attack the illegal problem at its root.

Chant it with me, MAGA Lock him up!!!

".0018 percent"

So 4 in 10, once translated into Republican Math.

"shove it !!!"

No caps, and incorrect spacing.

FFS, you can't even insult properly.

" abusing the system to persecute political adversaries "

For the 30th time, if you can't name a single indictment of Trump which you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions, you don't get to make that BS claim.

Can you finally name one, or should you STFU?

"The danger is real to them."

And not for the folks in say, Venezuela, if they're experiencing the same fears?

" show me where posts have to be term paper proofed"

Oh, they don't.

Just like you don't have to embarrass yourself by questioning someone else's intelligence, while displaying your lack of 2nd grade spelling abilities.

" I'm talking to snoofy....he's a little slow"

Does he know only three dots go in the middle of that sentence?

" ... you ignored the next line"

That wasn't my point.

It was that a poster who can't seem to spell, capitalize, or punctuate is questioning ANYONE ELSE'S intelligence.

You realize there's a Preview screen, right?

" well....mayhe you're just stupid.."

Classic self-retort.

" Still waiting on you"

Be sure to hold your breath!

"I will give you an out - post the individual provision in the Trump tax cuts that has expired."

From the business roundtable:

Expired on December 31, 2021:
Full Expensing of Research and Development (R&D) Investments
` As of 2022, businesses are required to expense R&D investments over five years rather than in the same year
the investments occurred, which is a damaging departure from 70 years of bipartisan pro-innovation policy.
` The U.S. is now one of only two developed countries without immediate expensing for R&D.
` China is doubling down on incentives to bolster R&D, while the U.S. is making it more expensive.
` More than 10,000 American jobs will be lost each year over the next decade without immediate R&D
expensing.
Expired on December 31, 2022:
Full Expensing of Investments in New Equipment, Machinery and Technology
` Starting in 2023, businesses can only expense 80% of investments in new equipment, falling to 60% in 2024,
40% in 2025, 20% in 2026 and eliminated completely in 2027.
` The elimination of full expensing discourages domestic investment, limiting opportunities for businesses
and workers in the U.S.
` Full and partial expensing has been in the tax code for 21 of the past 23 years and supported by Republicans
and Democrats.
` Permanent full expensing would create 73,000 American jobs.
Expired on December 31, 2021:
Limited Interest Deduction on Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation
and Amortization (EBITDA)
` As of 2022, the business interest deduction is restricted to 30% of a company's earnings before interest and
taxes (EBIT) rather than EBITDA. This is a tax increase.
` Switching from EBITDA to EBIT makes it more expensive for businesses to invest in America, resulting in
slower job creation, smaller wage increases and lower overall economic growth.
` The U.S. is now an international outlier on business interest deductibility, with no other developed country
basing the deduction on EBIT.
` Returning to an interest deduction based on 30% of a business' EBITDA would create nearly 10,000
American jobs.
1. 2. 3. Ernst & Young (2019, October). Impact of the Amortization of Certain R&D Expenditures on R&D

" At this point, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are not a tax preparer"

And that's why you're a moron.

You're "certain" of a falsehood.

Actually, it syncs well with your penchant to lie.

" I have read it - and Grok and I are right AGAIN"

What a riot.

You either didn't read it, or didn't understand what you were reading.

And Grok has already been proven wrong regarding the corporate tax cuts being made permanent.

Clearly, your prompts are garbage. GIGO.

No doubt Belle will be screaming CENSORSHIP, now that it's this clear.

Amirite?

"link to the individual provisions that have expired."

" That is a lie - Grok fully understands that."

You're a total moron.

You're too stupid to understand your own limitations.

If you pump garbage into Grok, you're going to get garbage out.

Grok didn't even know the corporate tax cuts have been made permanent.

But look at you, touting Grok as if it's flawless.

I guess dumfuqs gotta dumfuq.

Try educating yourself:

"I have read it - I also used Grok"

GIGO.

If you don't tell it the correct prompts, the result looks as dumb as you do.

Grok didn't know the corporate tax cuts had been made permanent, nor that most of the personal tax cuts (such as they weren't) have expired. Grok also didn't take into account your ignorance regarding the difference between DIRECT holding of US debt, and INDIRECT holding, like through mutual funds or corporate investing.

In other words ... GIGO.

And you are the garbage.

" which individual parts have already expired"

Read the code; do your own homework.

Pro tip: more important, what has been EXTENDED?

" realize that you said you are out camping on Brokeback Mountain"

What a riot. Here you are, once again, bringing up gay sex in the middle of a different discussion.

Basically, you've just admitted you're a screaming closeted queen without using those specific words.

" I'm not responsible for everyone"

Except you're an advocate for charity doing ALL the support.

Again ... how does that math work ... BECAUSE IT DOESN'T.

" Especially the part about being off the grid."

Two years ago, the bride and I did a sojourn in Wisconsin. Nine of our 17 days were off the grid. We camped in our tricked-out Sienna. I'd do that again in a minute.