Blaming Biden is idiocy, regardless the stripe.

My apologies for mixing his stupidity with yours.

Is ScottStupid still trying to pretend 4.4 is a BIGGER number than 4.6?

" The US dollar has also dropped 6-8% against Euro and $CDN in the last 6 months due to Biden."

Pick up a financial page, ffs. The slide began the day Trump announced tariffs.

As usual, The Party of Responsibility can't seem to take Responsibility. Ever.

"This is why I killfiled Danforth."

Interesting; you're the only one.

I must've embarrassed you a lot.

Meanwhile, you've got 22 plonks. That's some serious WOB neighborhood.

" Arguing about nothing of any significance"

You must've missed reading class, along with math class.

Dumfuq was using numbers to prove Trump's economy is headed the right way. Increasing, he said.

Except those numbers were HIGHER during the most recent prior tally, meaning the rates are DECREASING.

That completely destroys the underlying claim.

And now Dumfuq2 won't get the truth, since he plonked me.

" Well, looks like you finally had time to Google it. "

What ia riot. I've known the difference since before Stephen Moore wrote "tax cuts increase revenue", while using nominal dollars. So it looks like you lied, again.

You just can't help yourself, can you?

Here's a bigger shovel. Keep digging!

ScottS wants everyone to believe 4.4 is a BIGGER number than 4.6.

Gaslighter? Or moron?

My money's on both.

Nominal uses the numbers, without adjusting for inflation

Real adjusts for inflation.

Looks like time to chalk up ANOTHER lie.

Keep digging!

" My claim is on REAL WAGES "

And you claimed the rates were increasing, when they both actually decreased.

Now you're trying to change the subject.

Laughable.

But keep digging, by all means.

" The fact you keep referring to the 4.4% rate not knowing the difference between real and nominal is already funny."

Real v nominal has nothing to do with your mistake.

Increasing v decreasing is the issue. Why did you lie about the rates increasing, when the rates clearly decreased?

And btw, I'm very aware of real v nominal. But again, that's not what we're talking about. Laughable, you had to pretend it was.

" What was the real growth rate under Biden you are using for comparison"

I'm not.

I'm saying the last time the same-job and changed-job numbers were tallied UNDER TRUMP, both percentages were higher.

You claimed INCREASING, when the rate DECREASED. Clear as could be.

You lied. Or you're too stupid to tell a larger number from a smaller number.

My money's on both.

" By a very small handful of wealthy individuals"

Total lie. Virtually every one of my self-employed clients used it.

I'm done; you're not even TRYING to be truthful.

" Are real wages under Trump INCREASING OR DECREASING"

They're currently increasing 4.4%. However ...

Last time tallied, that number was higher.

The rate DECREASED to 4.4%.

You claimed INCREASING.

Now, once caught, you want to move the goalposts, again.

"YOU ARE NOT A TAX PREPARER."

Another lie.

And since you've made that claim over a dozen times, that's over a dozen lies.

So much for your bullschitt claim of bringing the truth.

You're just a garden variety prevaricator.

" This was NOT an individual targeted provision"

It was a tax break individuals used, which expired. Who gives AF where it was targeted, the expiration LANDED on INDIVIDUALS as well as corporations.

Put those goalposts back where you found them.

" You really aren't good at this debating thing."

Not when I'm up against a liar too ignorant to know when he's wrong.

Hell, you can't even be honest about INCREASING and DECREASING.

Too stupid? Or a liar?

" Yes - a corporate targeted provision."

USED BY INDIVIDUALS, even those not incorporated.

You asked, I delivered.

Now, are you too dumb to understand? Or are you planning on moving the goalposts again?

" I then challenged you to post a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL PROVISION"

And I did: bonus deprecation.

Now, are you going to pretend individuals didn't benefit from bonus deprecation?

My self-employed clients certainly did.

Also, when yearly caps remain the same, (like the onset of taxing Social Security), each successive year represents a tax increase, especially when other caps (like inheritance tax) are pegged to annual inflation. Any advantage the regular taxpayer had is past. Meanwhile, the corporate tax cuts were made permanent.

But I get it: these concepts are too advanced for you to grasp.

" The FACT is that REAL WAGES are positive and increasing under Trump."

Both the same-job and the changed job numbers were HIGHER last time they were tallied.

That means the margins are DECREASING, not increasing like you claimed.

Were you lying? Or are you too stupid to know 4.4% is LOWER than the prior tally?

"What is the pathological need on your part to continue to lie despite being caught red handed?"

My irony meter just exploded.

Tell us again how a head of lettuce won't be more expensive in a month.

Oh, and that 4.4% annualized gain you were celebrating? It's down from the last measure ... something you omitted, despite it being the salient fact.

So ... you were saying your hands are red?!?

"You literally claim to be a 'tax preparer' ... "

That's only because I've literally been one for 37 years.

" ... and claimed THE MAJORITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS OF THE TRUMP TAX CUTS HAVE ALREADY EXPIRED."

Oh, I never claimed that, as I never would. I said SOME aspects had expired.

Good God, man, you lie almost every time you post.

"Please tell the world (how) stupid you are."

Have you found those studies showing ear cartilage DOES grow back?

And what's your theory as to why no doctors held any press conferences?

C'mon, man. Show us how smart you are.

"I do feel sorry about having debunked your whole 'tax preparer' cosplay act"

See? ANOTHER lie.

Thanks for proving, once again, you don't know the truth from a hole in the ground.

" The first lie I say on here will be my first. "

Your bullschitt about the price of lettuce, where there are NO supply-chain glitches, and 100% of the workers show up, proves you don't understand the truth well enough to realize when you're lying.

You also didn't know the difference between direct ownership and indirect ownership. Again, too stupid to know your claim is false.

You're basically rounding first, unaware the catcher is still holding strike three.

"I have NEVER made that argument. I said that the .1% probably own US government debt in the same % that they own US stocks - which is much less than 50%.

Oh, so now you DO remember that discussion.

Thank for admitting you lied.

And you still haven't shown you understand the difference between direct ownership and indirect ownership.