Friday, March 21, 2025

Krasnov Fats Has FBI Redacting The Epstein Files

It's the FBI's flagship field office, with more than a thousand agents and another thousand or so civilian employees. And right now, multiple sources with knowledge of the matter say that one priority at the Bureau's New York Field Office is taking precedence over all others: the review and redaction of sensitive information in the Jeffrey Epstein case files, to prepare for possible publication. "It's literally all hands on deck," one source familiar with the matter tells me, adding that dozens and dozens of agents are working around the clock on the case, instead of on their regular duties. The flight logs, re-released last month, included references to Trump, who once noted that Epstein "likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." It's unclear whether or not the FBI will redact any further mentions to the president of the United States.

Comments

Bondi told Fox News that any further Epstein files would be blacked out only to "protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses," as well as national security information.

Bondi's covering for the orange diaper sniper.

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-21 10:47 AM

Republicans must be SO proud!

The Lyin' King ruled on the Lolita Express... he's everything they ever wanted to be.

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-21 11:43 AM

There may be a Canada connection to the arch-pedophile Epstein files release. Newly-sworn in Liberal PM Mark Carney will hold elections in April and rightwing "Canada Proud" began a slander campaign against him. Years ago Carney was photographed with Ghislaine Maxwell, although he denied being friends with either of the two sex traffickers. On top of that, several phony AI-generated images of Carney and Epstein are circulating on the internet: pressprogress.ca

This is too soon to tell, but oligarchs and the rightwing cooperate across borders to target progressives and liberals.

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-03-21 12:37 PM

@#1 ... as well as national security information. ...

Yeah, Pres Trump's possible (likely?, I wish I knew) mentions in the documents is considered "national security information."

That's how she seems to be avoiding a difficult situation.


Why weren't the JFK documents redacted to avoid the mention of personal info?



#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-21 08:25 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Republicans for Inflation (160 comments)

Trump on Upholding Constitution: 'I don't know' (103 comments)

Supreme Court Allows Trump's Transgender Military Ban (95 comments)

Texas: Afghan Military Hero Murdered over Parking Spot (46 comments)

Trump Says He Will Reopen Alcatraz Prison (43 comments)

Israel Plans to Capture All of Gaza Under New Plan (33 comments)

India Strikes Pakistan (32 comments)

3 People Die in ICE Custody in April (26 comments)

Almost Half of Layoffs This Year Caused by Trump (24 comments)

MAGA's Very Bad Night in Texas (17 comments)