India Strikes Pakistan | Drudge Retort

Regarding the Muslim terrorist attacks to which India is responding:

"According to survivors, the attackers singled out the men, and asked their religion before shooting them. Some tourists said that they were asked to recite the Islamic verse of kalima. Of the 26 people killed, 25 were tourists, and one was a local Muslim pony operator who tried to wrestle a gun from the attackers. All tourists killed were Hindus, except for one identified as a Christian."
en.wikipedia.org

Expect asymmetric warfare responses by Pakistani proxies inside India
#5 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS

Gee, I hope Muslim terrorists don't single out 25 non-Muslim tourists to murder them in cold blood. In an act of the religious tolerance and love per the pro-Hamas crowd here.

India attacked Pakistan because China is helping Pakistan and wants to hinder India's manufacturing development. This is nothing but a proxy war instigated by China, and India is falling for it.
#9 | Posted by oneironaut

Because the alternative of standing by and letting their people be murdered by Islamist nutjobs is an acceptable option?

We were promised nukes. Where are they? They promised!
#27 | Posted by chiligordo

Patience Shrimptacodan, patience.

There might be some spicy vindaloo coming out of the kitchen soon.

There she is. THERE she is.
#34 | Posted by redlightrobot

Hey, if consenting adult religious nutjobs living in third world sheetholes want to welcome the sweet embrace of death through nuclear apocalypse, who am I to stop them?

An ancient culture and look at how it's managed now.

Dude, people have been massacring each other, especially in India, since time immemorial. You'll probably deny it because much of that was committed by Muslims.

Some of the sultans actually had a goal of killing 100,000 Hindus a year.

But my favorite is the guy, Timur the Turkic, who killed 100,000 Hindu prisoners of war because he didn't want to leave them along with his baggage.

"they said that on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and foes of Islam at liberty.

"In fact, no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword'

Timur thereupon resolved to put them to death. He proclaimed :

"throughout the camp that every man who has infidel prisoners was to put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death. 100,000 infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain. Maulana Nasir-ud-din Umar, a counselor and a man of learning, who, in all his life had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives".
www.sikhnet.com

Funny stuff! This wasn't one bomb, This was ten thousand people executing a hundred thousand prisoners individually with swords.

You think today's barbarity is somehow excessive, but it's nothing compared to what came before.

Pretending that spears and swords compare with a nuclear threat isn't relevant. The aftermath is.
#39 | Posted by redlightrobot

Oh, I get it. The murder of 100,000 people/year in cold blood is no biggie unless it impacts you. That's an acceptable outlook.

I was mostly focused on your "An ancient culture and look at how it's managed now," though.

It seems to be managed slightly better than in the past, especially when Muslim rulers were the ones managing the Hindu population. But I totally understand why you may look back on those 100K slaughters of Hindus a year with nostalgia.