"#80 | Posted by Alexandrite"

So you do not currently believe that a Trump hooker pee tapes exists?

1.) At any time did you believe that one existed?
2.) Are you now willing to admit the other liberal raetards on here claiming the tape exists are, indeed, raetards?

"#75 | Posted by Alexandrite"

You believe there is a Trump hooker pee tape - why? Because you are a liberal raetard.

"Ive seen the birth certificate.
Haven't seen trumps yet.
#69 | Posted by Alexandrite"

No, you actually didn't dipshit. But, you being an uninquisitive useless turd, I doubt you will actually try to understand why you didn't.

"#67 | Posted by Alexandrite"

If you want to believe that crackhead, closeted, Kenyan was born in Hawaii...go ahead. But don't pretend there is a shred of evidence it is true.

"#62 | Posted by Sycophant"

She already brought the receipts dipshit - this is no longer in doubt. The only question is will the GOP actually prosecute them or let them slide like they usually do.

I think it is only a matter of time before Kenya protests the UN saying that their citizens should not be executed in the US. That actual birth certificate will be produced in record time.

"#63 | Posted by LampLighter"

Hey dipshit - you need to file a copyright claim against Danforth ASAP. He has completely stolen your posting style of writing utter nonsense, a complete lack of logical thought, and demands for links.

I simply do not think this board has enough active participants for both of you to be playing the same role.

If Obama's actions were as claimed, he needs to be impeached NOW (removing protection as the impeachment signals the actions were not part of official duties) and then get his neck stretched. Hell, string Michelle up by the balls while they are at it.

At the very least, they need to haul him in front of congress, under oath, and force him to admit all his actions and then we can string up his underlings.

"Apparently Scottsputz approves of finger rape over other rapes, just like Donnie does.
#121 | Posted by Corky"

Words have meaning dipshit. Like the word LYING - which you are doing repeatedly.

"noted was a quirk in NY law"

The quirk was extending an expired statute of limitations with the sole purpose to 'get Trump' in a bullshit liberal circus court where the judge would not allow Carroll's dress to be sampled for DNA (which would actually put the case to rest) as we demanded by Trump.

The whole idea behind a 'statute of limitations' is that defending yourself becomes impossible after a certain amount of time when the Batshit Crazies like Carroll can't even tell you the year in which the alleged assault occurred. The real travesty is that the dipshit liberal inhabitants of NYC don't actually care about justice and deemed Trump liable on essential a claim that is only made by Batshit Crazy Carroll without any supporting evidence and which is so general in nature that we can't even determine the year in which it allegedly occurred.

At the end of the day, is is the GOP's own fault as they should have immediately prosecuted Blasey Ford over her Kavanaugh smear. Instead, it now becomes the Democrat blueprint.

"The Judge clarified it.
#119 | Posted by Sycophant"

The "judge" has no role in this or authority. The state defined rape and THE JURY said it was not rape. I don't give 2 shits about what some anti-Trump dipshit judge says. We will have to let this fully play out - my guess, this all gets tossed and the Dems won't give 2 shits about it because it was about the smear only all along. That smear only works on the dumbest of the pig-shit stupid liberals, which is why the Democrats are down to 19% approval and falling fast.

"substantially true"
#117 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY"

Substantially True DOES NOT EQUAL TRUE - if it did, they would just say "true" without the qualifier. True and not-True are binary, it is one of the other. In this case, the statement that Trump was found liable for rape is NOT TRUE.

You repeating it now is called LYING.

Hope this helps dipshit.

"What did the jury explicitly accept?
#114 | Posted by snoofy"

NOT RAPE. It was explicitly asked on the jury form and they checked NO. No matter what you say now does not change that fact. So again, repeating it after you already know it is false is called LYING.

"#112 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY "

1.) A civil court does not rule on guilt
2.) The jury explicitly rejected rape

I know you have been informed of this already multiple times which means what you are doing now is LYING.

But, I guess when you are a Liberal, that is all you have left at this point.

"#32 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Stop talking to yourself in the mirror. The rest of us don't need to hear your inner thoughts.

"#30 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

And if the local police could put down the doughnuts, you would be in lock up right now answering for your crimes against children.

"#28 | Posted by Alexandrite"

And if your wife didn't have a penis, you would still be able to make a noise when you fart. But, what does that have to do with the discussion?

My point was directly related to the fact that US demographic changes have made a Reagan-like 49-state sweep impossible as was being discussed. That is how discussions work. Your point? No clue what you were trying to state there.

"I grew up around real estate. There's a huge difference between a 30,000 sq ft apartment, and a 10,000 sq ft apartment with tall ceilings. If you can't admit the former is purposely leaving out the conversion costs, you're a math moron."

Please tell me the difference -------. If it is zoned to allow for the 3 floors and sqft can be tripled, why would you ignore this in the valuation.

"It is the responsibility of the loan officer to apply discounts to that number to assess what they believe the true value is."

"But they don't physically inspect every nook and cranny"

So, you think they did not assign a single appraiser to check? Or, do you think that appraiser did not know the difference between 30,000 and 10,000 sqft?

"and they expect, under penally of perjury, the information is correct."

What is under perjury? You seem to not understand the difference between you - as a poor ------- doing a standardized home loan vs. a complex real estate transaction with a group like Deutsch Bank. DB does not even do traditional home loans in the US -------.

"I understand "good light". But claiming 30,000 when you've got 10,000 and tall ceilings? Single-family homes certainly can't do that.
#110 | Posted by Danforth"

Again, it is not a traditional home loan -------.

"#23 | Posted by jpw"

If the US racial demographics were the same as 1984 and the racial groups voted the same way they did in 2024, Trump would have won by ~6% nationally.

Just take CA as an example, CA is now only 34.7% White Non-Hispanic vs. 66.6% in 1984. Bring back the 1984 Demographics and Trump wins CA as well - which is why the Democrats are so hellbent on the 'browning' of America.

"That wasn't your barometer. it was CRIME.
#104 | Posted by Danforth"

Again, raetard, civil courts don't find CRIMES, they find TORTS. Please look up the definitions of each before further embarrassing yourself -------.

Or, ask pretend lawyer LegallyRetarded to explain it to you as I am pretty sure they covered that at the Wakanda U School of Law.

""2 different numbers for 2 different purposes"
Which is illegal."

Again, your understanding of the law is just as bad as your understanding of taxes and economics.

In NYC, the property tax is based on the current property descriptions and use - NOT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. Hence, if Trump's 10,000sqft home has triple height ceilings, it will base the value on a similar triple height property. For a loan officer, if the value is materially higher assuming you add the 2 floors to triple the salable sqft and that results in a higher resale value, they will use that number because a loan office is concerned with MARKET VALUE INCLUDING DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL.

"For Trump's property, it has triple-height ceilings"
That doesn't allow you to claim three times the truth.

If it is fully zoned to allow for it, YES - YOU CAN.

"Loan applications don't work that way."

Yes, THEY DO. It is obvious that you have never done a real estate transaction in which there is development potential for the property. For instance, let's say that you have rental property that is zoned for 4 units, but some past owner combined all the units into a single unit so that is it currently being used as a single unit dwelling (despite the zoning). How will the loan office assess the building - as a single unit or as a 4 unit property?

"For the loan officer, this is the value that is relevant to their decision"
Nonsense. It completely ignores the renovation costs, which is a fraudulent misrepresentation.
#99 | Posted by Danforth"

IN EVERY real estate transaction, the loan applicant puts forth the property in the best possible light and supplies their internal assessment of the properties value. It is the responsibility of the loan officer to apply discounts to that number to assess what they believe the true value is. For instance, if Trump took out a $50M loan and supplied $500M worth of real estate as assessed by him to collateralize it, the $500M valuation from Trump is meaningless. The loan office will assess for themselves and they may conclude the actual value, in their estimation, is $100M. At the end of the day if they assume 2x collateral coverage is sufficient as the original 10x coverage was ridiculously high, they will still give the loan. They don't even need to tell the borrower what their collateral assessment was - just whether it was sufficient for the loan.

Again, in your repeated ridiculous talking points, you prove you have no clue how business actually works.

"It's also a crime if proven in civil court. Victims have the legal option to pursue either.
#97 | Posted by Danforth"

Your understanding of the courts is just as bad as your understanding or taxes and economics.

CIVIL COURTS find LIABILITY

CRIMINAL COURTS find GUILT

No person in the history of United States has been found liable and served a jail sentence based on the finding in a civil court. They are found liable for a TORT.

You have now been fully educated on this. You further repeating your nonsense no longer shows ignorance on your part, but the intention to lie.

"Trump also had a bad habit of claiming 30,000 sq ft on his apartment on loan applications, and 10,000 on tax rolls.
#92 | Posted by Danforth"

2 different numbers for 2 different purposes -------. If you are talking valuation for tax purposes, it should be stated as the property current stands. If you are talking about the value for a loan officer which may reflect development potential (which is the case for Trump given zoning permissions), you state the values based on the development potential allowed under the law.

For Trump's property, it has triple-height ceilings. Thus, he is able to simple install the 2 floors above and sell the unit for 3x the square feet under the zoning an construction permissions. For the loan officer, this is the value that is relevant to their decision as they want to know what could be recovered in the case the loan failed and they seized the collateral and resold it.

The same applies to Mar a lago. The tax basis for property tax purposes has NOTHING to do with the value of the property in the case it is seized as collateral.

You would understand this if you actually had any wealth or financial sense. However, as you have repeatedly proven - you have neither.

"#88 | POSTED BY SCOTTS
Sexual assault isn't a crime?
#90 | Posted by ClownShack"

It is if charged and proven in a CRIMINAL COURT - which did not happen in Trump's case. You continually stating this while being continually corrected on it shows that it is not a case of ignorance for you but an intention to lie.

""I will get right on that"
Well?
#89 | Posted by Danforth"

Seems your inability to detect sarcasm is on par with Lamplighter. Good job ------- - your transformation is complete!

"#17 | Posted by oneironaut"

As I posted in another thread - his descent into insanity is probably a result of untreated syphilis, a disease common among those that share his degenerate lifestyle.

"Jail: He sexually assaulted a woman, cooked the books he gave the government of New York, and stole documents he refused to return.
#86 | Posted by ClownShack"

1.) the 'sexual assault' was not a criminal charge and was not even the impetus of the case. The case was about defamation. So, if you want to say he should he be in jail for it, have the balls to demand ------- Crazy Carroll file a criminal charge - I 100% support that. She won't - because everyone knows this would be tossed out of court immediately due to lack of evidence.

2.) He 'cooked the books' in a case that was not prosecuted during the valid statute of limitations because what he did was a standard practice and the accurate way to record the transactions for payments to your lawyer. The Dems needed to invent a new crime - which they never clarified or that he has been convicted of or even charged with to this day.

3.) Stole documents that WERE UNDER HIS SOLE DISCRETION TO DECLASSIFY and thus, perfectly legal for him to possess. Very different from Pedo Biden that stole documents from a SCIF as a senator (no right to take the documents from the SCIF) then stored in his unsecured garage because he wanted to feed them to a ghostwriter. However, you give him a total pass because he allowed the Fed to seize them. Like a bank robber being given a total pass if they give the money back. It is either a crime or it is not - and the Democrats used an unprecedented view of the law to charge Trump.

Your constant repetition of already debunked talking points seem to be a symptom of late stage syphilis - given your degenerate lifestyle and a syphilis infection rate of homosexuals, you should get this treated before your brain is Biden-ized.