... posting false memes that said supporters of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton could vote for her by text message or social media post ...

Why would an apparent social media influencer want to post those types of comments in the first place?

Does this decision now make it OK to do so?

@#8

? & The Mysterians.

Wow, it's been years since I've heard that one.

@#1 ... This certainly has the appearance of Mackey being targeted as a political enemy. ...

If this is so certain to your current alias, please explain why, with evidence.

thx.

@#10 ... 1st Amendment ...

So, the 1st Amendment allows a person apparently to actively influence an election?

That's not what the Court ruled.

As your current alias states in its summary, the case was tossed out because of a lack of evidence.

So, now, please explain why the 1st Amendment covers this type of behavior?

thx.

@#13 ... When an appeals court remands the lower court unanimously due to "lack of evidence" it's a strong indication the case should not have ever been brought. ...

I do not disagree with that. But, thank-you for answering some random question, but that's not the question I asked.

But I do note your current alias did not answer the question I asked, what evidence is there about the targeting?

How does your current alias know this was targeting?

@#15 ... I said it "looks like targeting". To me that's what it looks like. ...

Point taken.

So, your current alias no evidence of targeting, aside from how it thinks it looks.