Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Dotard Threatens China With Cooking Oil Ban

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday Washington was considering terminating some trade ties with China, including in relation to cooking oil. "I believe that China purposefully not buying our Soybeans, and causing difficulty for our Soybean Farmers, is an Economically Hostile Act. We are considering terminating business with China having to do with Cooking Oil, and other elements of Trade, as retribution," Trump wrote on social media.

Comments

www.youtube.com

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-10-15 08:06 AM

... "I believe that China purposefully not buying our Soybeans, and causing difficulty for our Soybean Farmers ...

... and why might China have stopped buying our soybeans? Could it be because of the whimsical tariffs that Pres Trump has hurled against imports from China?

In other words, China not buying our farmers' soybeans is likely the result of Trump trade "policy" towards China.


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-15 01:11 PM

Related ...

Soybean bailout? Hard-hit farmers want China trade more than Trump aid.
www.csmonitor.com

... The trade war between China and the United States has devolved into a shoot-out, with one commodity now positioned to help stop the crossfire: soybeans.

China isn't buying them from the U.S. anymore, at least for now, and although President Donald Trump has talked about bailing out American soybean farmers, he hasn't followed through yet.

New U.S. tariffs on lumber and furniture, as well as wider Chinese controls on rare-earth minerals, have heated up the political rhetoric and roiled markets.

But there are reasons the two countries could come together, and agriculture may provide the first step.

The U.S. is eager to sell, and China, presumably, is eager to buy the pea-sized yellow bean that produces vegetable oil for humans and feed for livestock. If Beijing and Washington can reach a soybean agreement in the near future, it may prove a stepping stone to a larger trade agreement. If they can't, it may further sour relations between the two economic powers.

"It's a game of chicken, in one sense," says Joseph Glauber, an emeritus research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute and former chief economist of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "Agriculture is the collateral damage in this trade fight with China." ...


#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-15 01:13 PM

We wok your dog for you!

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-10-15 09:39 PM

Monkey with a machinegun.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-15 10:04 PM

Cooking oil ban. That won't hurt the US farmers that grow those crops at all.

#6 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-10-16 10:52 AM

Dummkopf Trumpf's tariffs will cost global businesses upward of $1.2 trillion, with most of the cost being passed onto consumers, according to a new analysis from S&P Global: www.cnbc.com

Take a bow Republican voters, you did this to yourselves and us. Gut arbet!

#7 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-10-17 02:08 AM

We are forcing everyone to view USA as "vendor of last resort". It's going to cost more than money. Be a member of a "coalition of the willing" or a UN vote or some other assault on national sovereignty.
It's going to be weaponized.

#8 | Posted by fresno500 at 2025-10-18 12:06 AM

" We are forcing everyone to view USA as "vendor of last resort"."

Thanks, Trumpers! You Built That!!!

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-10-18 12:10 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

TPM: Democrats Won Everywhere on Tuesday (39 comments)

California GOP Sue After Voters Approve Prop 50 (27 comments)

Narco-sub Carrying 1.7 Tonnes of Cocaine Seized in Atlantic (22 comments)

Quite Possibly the Most Absurd SCOTUS Case of My Lifetime (18 comments)

Nancy Pelosi Announces Retirement from Congress (17 comments)

Latino MAGA Angry at Trump (17 comments)

Mexico's President Sheinbaum Presses Charges After Groping (17 comments)

Sandwich Thrower Acquitted (14 comments)

Fleetwood Mac's Song 'Landslide' Goes Viral (14 comments)

Trump says He has to Start Using a 'new word' -- 'affordability' (13 comments)