Immigrants Use Less Welfare at Every Income Level. An astute reader of our recent Cato policy brief on immigrant welfare use suggested stratifying it by income since many welfare programs are intended to help the poor. We do that below and find that immigrants consistently report lower welfare participation than natives for nearly every program across poverty status and the income distribution
My commentary: I appreciate die-hard racists will say "It doesn't matter if they use less welfare, they shouldn't be here in the first place." Thinking this argument must be economically sound, as zero immigrants can only mean zero cost associated with immigrants, and nothing's cheaper than that.
Cato addresses that as well. In "Immigrants' Recent Effects on Government Budgets: 1994"2023"
For each year from 1994 to 2023, the US immigrant population generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government.
Over that period, immigrants created a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion in real 2024 US dollars, including $3.9 trillion in savings on interest on the debt.
Without immigrants, US government public debt at all levels would be at least 205 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)"nearly twice its 2023 level. https://www.cato.org/white-paper/immigrants-recent-effects-government-budgets-1994-2023
Drudge Retort Headlines
The Children of Dilley (264 comments)
Kid Rock Mocked for 'miming' Turning Point USA Half-Time Performance (45 comments)
Rep. Thomas Massie Threatens to Go 'Nuclear,' Reveal Epstein Client Names (40 comments)
GOP Push Would Drastically Change how Americans Cast Ballots (34 comments)
Pro-Trump Town Finds Out (25 comments)
As AI Enters the Operating Room, Reports Arise of Errors (22 comments)
Ghislaine Maxwell Holds Out for Trump Pardon (22 comments)
Trump Lashes Out at American Olympian who Expressed Negative View of US Politics (18 comments)
NFL Breaks Silence on Bad Bunny Halftime Show Ratings (17 comments)
Trump told Palm Beach Police Chief 'everyone' Knew about Epstein (16 comments)