After getting the opportunity to view the unredacted files, Rep. Thomas Massie threatened to read the names on the House floor to secure justice for survivors.
And they told Rep. Thomas Massie and me this was a hoax and conspiracy when we risked our reputations and careers to pursue the release of the files.
-- Ro Khanna (@rokhanna.bsky.social) Feb 5, 2026 at 4:22 PM
[image or embed]
Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin spoke with reporters on Monday after viewing unredacted versions of the Epstein files, relaying that one document he saw appeared to suggest that Trump never asked Epstein to leave his Mar-a-Lago club like the president has claimed
people.com
"it was during the period of the 2009 investigation and Epstein's lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar a Lago, but he was a guest at Mar a Lago and he had never been asked to leave and that was redacted"
From the C-SPAN link.
Republican Sen Lummis says she's changed her mind after new Epstein revelations today: "Initially my reaction to all this was, I don't care. I don't see what the big deal is. But now I see what the big deal is. The members of Congress who were pushing this were not wrong!"
www.youtube.com
DOJ Deleted an Epstein Prosecution Memo About Possible Co-Conspirators. We Saved It.
An 86-page DOJ memo detailing possible Epstein co-conspirators vanished after reporters asked questions. But we saved a copy.
The memo, titled "Investigation into Potential Co-Conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein," had been publicly accessible as part of the massive tranche of Epstein-related documents recently released. Then, after reporters from the Miami Herald, including the renowned Julie K. Brown, began asking the DOJ specific questions about it, the document was suddenly gone.
But unfortunately for the Trump DOJ, we had already saved it.
And we're making it available so the public can read it for themselves. You can download it in its entirety by clicking here:
www.meidasplus.com
Trump Officials Redacted Epstein Files to Protect Prominent' Individuals, Lawmakers Allege
Members of Congress who on Monday were granted access to unredacted Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein said they discovered evidence that at least six men had been concealed from public view without clear legal justification, renewing accusations that the Trump Administration had improperly shielded powerful figures from scrutiny
time.com
Epstein Files Whistleblower Reveal Letter Naming DOJ Officials Who Protected Co-Conspirators
The latest wave of Epstein file releases has ignited fierce debate after a resurfaced whistleblower letter allegedly named senior US Justice Department officials linked to a controversial plea agreement.
Supporters call the documents a long buried roadmap exposing how powerful figures escaped scrutiny, while critics warn that many claims remain unverified. With lawmakers preparing to review unredacted files inside a secure DOJ reading room, questions over missing documents, protected associates and alleged legal manoeuvres have again pushed one of the most controversial criminal cases in modern history back into global headlines.
www.ibtimes.co.uk
"Did you have a chance to review tany of the unredacted files over at DOJ, the Epstein Files?"
"I did."
"You did?"
"Yeah, I just came from there."
"What can you tell us?"
"They're a bunch of sick fscks."
US Rep Becca Balint (D, VT)
www.reddit.com
Bay Area congressman who viewed unredacted Epstein files says at least 6 men are implicated
www.sfchronicle.com
... Two members of Congress who pushed the federal government to publicly release its investigations into the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein said they had identified at least six men who were likely incriminated in the well-connected financier's crimes, but declined to share the names. ...
Once again (see #18, and #22) I ask... why not say the names?
Who is (are?) the Trump DoJ protecting?
@#28
Like this?
Conspiracy of Silence (1994) Child pedophile rings in government, banned by congress from airing on Discover Channel (2015)
www.reddit.com
Citing demand, lawmaker claims DOJ denied some from viewing Epstein files
www.newsnationnow.com
... The Department of Justice on Monday denied some lawmakers from viewing the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files following criticism that the administration has improperly shielded the identities of various people.
The DOJ claims too many lawmakers signed up for timeslots and the schedule is full, a lawmaker told NewsNation. ...
As I have said previously in #25...
On the four computers the DoJ has provided.
How many lawmakers? How many computers? How many documents to view?
Why is the DoJ looking to slow-step all this?
And in this comment I add... what is the DoJ seemingly trying to cover-up?
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has defended the administration's handling of the files, while acknowledging that most people would not be satisfied by the information contained inside the documents.
"There's a hunger or a thirst for information that I do not think will be satisfied by the review of these documents and ... there's nothing I can do about that," Blanche said last month.
"There's this built-in assumption that somehow there's this hidden tranche of information of men that we know about, that we're covering up, or that we're choosing not to prosecute," he continued at the time. "That is not the case."
"I don't know whether there are men out there that abuse these women. If we learn about information and evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will," the deputy attorney general added. "But I don't think that the public or you all are going to uncover men within the Epstein files that abuse women, unfortunately."
GOP senator on Epstein files: Now I see what the big deal is'
Who is (are?) the Trump DoJ protecting?
#27 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER
I was under the impression Trump kicked and called cops on Epstein at Trumps club. Why would he do that if guilty of whatever your claim is?
Trump bashed Epstein to Palm Beach police during first investigation, called Maxwell evil,' record shows
www.cnbc.com
Drudge Retort Headlines
Undeclared War (374 comments)
Only 21% of Americans Support the U.S. Initiating an Attack on Iran (49 comments)
Transgender Kansans Challenge State Law Invalidating Their Driver's Licenses (38 comments)
Israel says Iran Supreme Leader Khamenei is Dead (36 comments)
Fact-Checking Trump's Justifications for Attacking Iran (23 comments)
Three US Soldiers Dead in Iran Action (20 comments)
Trump: US Could Carry Out 'Friendly Takeover' of Cuba (17 comments)
Pakistan and Afghanistan's Taliban Claim Major Casualties (16 comments)
NASA Abruptly Changes Its Roadmap to the Moon (12 comments)
Iran Wants to Talk, I Have Agreed -- Trump (11 comments)