Now a study is needed of the best and worst public school students' parents.

When it comes to best schools/worst schools, it reminds me of the yearbooks from 1st to 12th.

Can anyone explain why grades 1 through 4 the group pictures show everyone smiling and side by side regardless of race.

Yet, at 5 through 12, the kids self segregate.

The school doesn't segregate. The teachers didn't. The cafeteria staff didn't.

The kids did.

What's worse? The classes were broken into academic level. So, the smart kids were is class A, medium kids in B. Lowest in C.

Watch the yearbook pictures of the movement of a few students as they go up and down. Some of this movement had nothing to do with the education, but the look of student being educated.

DBT2, since you mentioned.

Nazi were doing human testing since the 1940.

Most of their scientists became Americans.

#43 | Posted by ClownShack

The US wanted the Japanese research done, too, that was human testing. A lot of Japanese escaped the Tribunals.

The Supreme Court decision is 9-0.

Nobody doubted it for a second.

But,if the Court leans one way, it must be political. Especially if all the Justices are appointed by one side creating a majority.

How much did the decisions, after 9 Justices were appointed by one President, affect the country.

Of course the SCOTUS is political. They can't get appointed without having a bias.

what does AI think about the US abolishing the Senate and placing the SCOTUS and POTUS unser the House authority

Abolishing the Senate and placing both the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and the President (POTUS) under the direct authority of the House of Representatives would fundamentally transform the United States from a constitutional republic with a separation of powers into a unicameral parliamentary system with absolute legislative supremacy.

Here is an analysis of what this system would look like, along with its potential advantages and structural risks.

The Structural Shift
Unicameral Legislature: The House of Representatives would become the sole lawmaking body, removing the "saucer" meant to cool hot legislative passions.
Parliamentary Executive: The President would likely function like a Prime Minister, chosen by and subservient to the majority party in the House.

Subservient Judiciary: The Supreme Court would lose its status as a co-equal branch, meaning the House could overturn judicial rulings or remove justices at will.

Potential Advantages
End of Legislative Gridlock: Bill passage would become rapid because the friction between the House, Senate, and presidential vetoes would disappear.

Direct Democratic Responsiveness: The House is proportional to population, meaning the national majority's will would immediately translate into law without the rural bias of the Senate.

Clear Accountability: The governing majority party would hold total responsibility for national outcomes, making it easier for voters to reward or punish them in elections.

Potential Risks and Downsides
Tyranny of the Majority: Without the Senate or an independent SCOTUS, a slim House majority could pass laws that suppress minority parties, specific states, or marginalized groups.

Loss of Equal State Representation: Small states would lose their equal footing (currently protected by the Senate), leading to political dominance by highly populated states like California, Texas, and New York.

Extreme Policy Volatility: National laws, economic regulations, and judicial interpretations could radically flip-flop every two years based on whichever party wins the House.

Eradication of Civil Liberties Protections: If SCOTUS is under House authority, the Bill of Rights would effectively become optional, as the House could override constitutional protections with a simple majority vote.

The single lever voter would destroy a nation out of spite.

Estimated 10 million times annually and recorded more than 6,600 times. Additionally, specific renditions of the hymn have actually reached the number one spot on global music charts.

Amazing Grace.

Elvis, Aretha Franklin, The Royal Scots Dragoon Guards, Dan Vasc, Tina Turner, even President Obama.

Like them or not though I'll still choose them over a Fascist!

Aka

Will vote for someone who will abolish the Senate, place the POTUS and SCOTUS under House rule, prison abolition, the release of all incarcerated people, and the closure of local jails, abolish the border, amnesty and voting rights for all non citizens, 32-hour work week, introducing a federal wealth tax, establishing universal rent control, and canceling all debts, and everything a personal right should be free.

If this person wins the primary, you'll vote for them no matter what.

Do not want a king.

I wrote this earlier:

Cutting aid to other nations.
Affordable Healthcare
Jobs and income opportunity.
Cutting the MIC.
Closing the hundreds of US foreign military bases.
Stop stationing troops in other countries.
Renegotiate all treaties and stop bring the blood and sweat of other nations defense.

This is neither party right now.

The two parties are running amok and need to be stopped.

Danger to democracy? Right now, it looks like both. One has just piated an entire platform to destroy it

I am not your moral police.

Everyone must choose how they vote.

If your choice is to dismantle the Constitution and to follow this platform, be honest with results.

If their platform had not been so honest, a lot of their complaints and solutions could be accepted, even just in part.

But, do you really believe the House being all authority as one branch is the right path?

Is it worth the cost?

From their own platform

"Imagine taking a day off from work in a future without capitalism.

It might not feel as badly needed as it does now. You enjoy your work; it's interesting to you, and you're well trained for it. You work as much as you are able and no more than needed, and you would control your own labor and see it going to good use. It's not just a job to pay the bills.

Speaking of bills: you don't really have them anymore.

You have no debt. You don't need health insurance. You don't pay a mortgage or have a landlord, because comfortable housing is a human right. Your retirement is publicly funded. Food, education, energy, medicine, and transportation aren't for-profit businesses; they are common goods and utilities.

OK, enough about bills. What do you do on your day off? Maybe in the morning, you walk your kids to school, run errands, or go to a doctor's appointment. In the afternoon, you might play a sport, practice a new skill, read, plan a trip. In the evening, you could meet up with friends or family and eat together, maybe go to the movies or down to the park."

Are you prepared to vote for this because you don't like the current two parties?

The banking system has always been a country problem child.

Yes, there are many things to fix.

Both parties have held the all three branches, yet nothing ever gets fixed and done.

Cutting aid to other nations.
Affordable Healthcare
Jobs and income opportunity.
Cutting the MIC.
Closing the hundreds of US foreign military bases.
Stop stationing troops in other countries.
Renegotiate all treaties and stop bring the blood and sweat of other nations defense.

The destruction of the Constitution and Laws of the Nation as described on the SDA website are too perilous.

Stop claiming it can't happen.

It is.

You only need to win politically.

Promise the world and the majority votes for it.

But, majority rule isn't what protects our nation.

Would you vote for dismantling the US System of Govt to stop another party from being elected?

If one party heads on that direction,what would you do?

The single lever voter will vote against any Republican to have a DSA candidate win.

Abolish the Senate. Abolish the Supreme Court. Abolish the Office of the President.

Abolish borders, prisons.

Never happen?

That is the agenda. So, how to make it happen?

Win the Dem primary. That is all. Once these candidates win the primary, would any Dem vote Republican to prevent this agenda?

The Constitution and the Law can be amended. It's just a matter of filling the ballots with like minded people.

Would you vote against a DSA candidate if they are on the ballot?

The single lever voter will.

Went into a foreign country without having An Israeli government security detail.

Without notifying the authorities, they were lucky to be alive.

Claiming to be a US official could have created a bigger mess.

Americans thinking their rights protect them overseas are idiots.

On referee sites, the conversation was asking why the whistle wasn't blown for a careless foul. (Quite a lot allowed)

Argue whether it should have been yellow or red for the act, but the referee didn't even call the careless foul and was looking right at the play. No signal for advantage so it was nothing.

The referees watching this will tell you that it's the uppers telling referees to allow fouls that should be called. Want the job, move up, have higher scores from assessors? Screw the laws. Let then play means don't enforce the game.

Grassroots referees can't stand watching this as young players are learning horrible habits (and wonder why they get called for fouls and misconduct)

Decades of two party knowledge, complicity, and criminality.

Until individuals face criminal charges, there's no wrongdoing.

These settlements are just NDAs. Paid Protection.

Once upon a time, the US didn't waste time with prisoners. Execution and punishment dealt with criminals.

Went on a field trip with highschoolers to Virginia. The learned the early history of what the prison was for and why the gallows stood outside.

It should be 9-0.

It should also be 535-0 to pass an amendment to fix the amendment.

The govt can always come for your gold.

All dreams are pipes until the tune is played or they break.

If the troops aren't needed on foreign soil, relocate or shrink the Military

Close the 900+ US Foreign military bases.