Massie Threatens to Go Nuclear & Reveal Epstein Client Names
After getting the opportunity to view the unredacted files, Rep. Thomas Massie threatened to read the names on the House floor to secure justice for survivors.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
qcp
Joined 2007/07/05Visited 2026/02/09
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Massie Threatens to Go Nuclear & Reveal Epstein Client Names (14 comments) ...
Less Than 14% of ICE Arrests Had Violent Criminal Records (4 comments) ...
Kid Rock Mocked for 'miming' Turning Point USA Half-Time Performance (30 comments) ...
Nashville Furious About Power Outages, Republicans Blame 'woke' (9 comments) ...
Warren to Call for Reversal of Trump's UAE Chip Sales (9 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
As well he should.
#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-09 03:09 PM | Reply
... Massie Threatens to Go Nuclear & Reveal Epstein Client Names ...
Why were they redacted in the first place?
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 03:34 PM | Reply
The irrational raging MAGA desire to destroy the hated Clintons by exposing the former POTUS in the Epstein files has a baseball analog.
Year ago several players on an MLB team kept loudly pestering their manager in the dugout to complain to the umpire that the opposing pitcher was cheating by scuffing the baseball or applying a liniment on it.
After a while the manager couldn't take it anymore as the TV cameras kept zooming in on them, so he yelled at his team:
"Hey, fer Chrissake, pipe down you guys! What the hell do you think our pitcher is doing out there?!"
#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-09 03:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
@#2 ... Why were they redacted in the first place? ...
www.kptv.com
... However, there is also concern for what some are calling the over-redaction of important details, namely people believed to have aided Epstein. In a 2014 email released in the files, a person writes to Epstein, "Thank you for a fun night ... your littlest girl was a little naughty." The identity of the individual who wrote the message is redacted. ...
In a 2014 email released in the files, a person writes to Epstein, "Thank you for a fun night ... your littlest girl was a little naughty."
The identity of the individual who wrote the message is redacted. ...
Why was the sender's name redacted?
#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 04:07 PM | Reply
Talk's cheap. Believe it when I see it. Frankly, I'm coming to believe this country is too stupid and corrupt to survive.
#5 | Posted by morris at 2026-02-09 04:44 PM | Reply
This seems to be the only winning issue for Democrats.
So it would actually be beneficial for Republicans to completely release everything.
#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-09 07:01 PM | Reply
@#5 ... Talk's cheap. Believe it when I see it. ...
Look at the email cited in #4.
#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 07:38 PM | Reply
Massie is going to get himself assassinated.
Gotta hand it to the guy, he's got some brass balls.
#8 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-09 07:50 PM | Reply
@#8 ... Gotta hand it to the guy, he's got some brass balls. ...
I do not disagree.
That aside, Congress passed a law with only one dissenting vote about this.
Yet the Trump administration still seems to be avoiding following that law.
imo, this is looking more and more like a cover-up by the Trump administration.
Which begs the question ... what might the Trump administration be so focused upon covering up?
#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 08:34 PM | Reply
Massie isn't alone.
House Oversight Democrat Rep. Stansbury exited a closed-door deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell, issuing explosive accusations about a wider cover-up tied to the Epstein case.
"There are more than three dozen individuals directly associated with Donald Trump named in those files."
"The United States government is engaged in an active cover-up of the largest sex trafficking scandal and influence peddling scandal in the history of the United States and Donald Trump is right at the center of it."
www.reddit.com
#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-09 09:00 PM | Reply
Nothing stops one of them from lying on the Floor. They could read off every member of Congress and they'd be protected by the Speech and Debate clause.
Can't trust any name given and any name withheld.
#11 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-02-09 09:17 PM | Reply
"Nothing stops one of them from lying on the Floor."
Nothing stops Trump from lying either.
I believe the one who isn't a convicted felon. You believe the one who is a convicted felon.
#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-09 09:52 PM | Reply
February 9, 2026 Rep. Jamie Raskin News Conference on Epstein Files Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, spoke to reporters after his own review of unredacted files held by the Justice Department related to its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. He accused the Justice Department of making numerous "completely unnecessary" redactions that he said appeared to protect President Trump and former Victoria's Secret CEO Les Wexner, among others, and questioned whether the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law in late 2025, was being fully followed by the Trump administration
"We need to be investigating the money. We need to be investigating the organizational hierarchy. There's no way you run a billion dollars international child trafficking ring with just two people committing crimes, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. No way. It doesn't work like that. So we need to figure out what other conspiracies were involved, what Our co-conspirators were involved, and I really do believe that listening to the survivors is going to be our pathway through this nightmare."
"Well, remember what Congress called for was a complete release of the files and just the redaction of the names of the victims. Now, unfortunately, the names of the victims were not redacted relating to more than 100 women in the case, so that is baffling and staggering that that would happen. But then there are Thousands and thousands of pages replete with redactions. There are entire pages and memos where you can't see anything. It's all blacked out and there are no names of victims in there. So it's just a very puzzling thing and the Department of Justice needs to explain it. The whole country should be able to read what this federal law compelled them to produce."
www.c-span.org
#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-09 10:05 PM | Reply
Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin spoke with reporters on Monday after viewing unredacted versions of the Epstein files, relaying that one document he saw appeared to suggest that Trump never asked Epstein to leave his Mar-a-Lago club like the president has claimed people.com
"it was during the period of the 2009 investigation and Epstein's lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar a Lago, but he was a guest at Mar a Lago and he had never been asked to leave and that was redacted" From the C-SPAN link.
#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-09 10:21 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy