It is now official: Gas is averaging over $4 a gallon in every state, according to the AAA. read more
3,700 Trades, Zero Accountability
We've actually had this item on the "to do" list for a few weeks. If ever there is a day to run it, today's definitely that day.
Yesterday, Donald Trump's lawyers saw the writing on the wall and realized his and his kids' "lawsuit" against the IRS was going to be carefully investigated by the judge in the case, which would put his latest, greatest grift at risk.
Future historians may record May 14, 2026, as the day the leader of the United States, the greatest superpower in the history of the world, acknowledged that the country was declining ... read more
"Because you seem to keep posting that transgender ads were the problem."
And you have an alternative?
Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
"Because you seem to keep posting that transgender ads were the problem."
And you have an alternative?
Five Reasons Harris Lost
Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?
Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures
Why Kamala Harris lost the election
Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results
There is no one reason Harris lost
Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris LostInflation, moderation, and candidate effectsWhat Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?
"Because you seem to keep posting that transgender ads were the problem."
And you have an alternative?
Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates
And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?
click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad
Zero dollars
The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.
Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.
Either way, mission accomplished.
#24 "We are discussing why the dems lost in 2024."
Ya think?
Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
By Bill Barrow and Marc Levy
NOV. 14, 2024
-----
ATLANTA (AP) " After losing the White House and both houses of Congress, Democrats are grappling with how to handle transgender politics and policy following a campaign that featured withering and often misleading GOP attacks on the issue.
There is plenty of second-guessing after President-elect Donald Trump anchored his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris with sweeping promises on the economy and immigration. But Democrats also will not soon forget the punchline in anti-transgender Trump ads that became ubiquitous by Election Day: "Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you."
#24 "We are discussing why the dems lost in 2024."
Ya think?
Five Reasons Harris Lost
Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?
Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures
Why Kamala Harris lost the election
Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results
There is no one reason Harris lost
Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris LostInflation, moderation, and candidate effectsWhat Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?
#24 "We are discussing why the dems lost in 2024."
Ya think?
Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates
And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?
click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad
Zero dollars
The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.
Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.
Either way, mission accomplished.
Five Reasons Harris Lost
Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?
Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures
Why Kamala Harris lost the election
Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results
There is no one reason Harris lost
Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris LostInflation, moderation, and candidate effectsWhat Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?
Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates
And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?
click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad
Zero dollars
The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.
Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.
Either way, mission accomplished.

#27: Good question, South_American.