Where I live, that's generally homes in the $400,000 to $800,000 range (MOL). That describes my neighborhood.
I am not aware of any government agencies buying homes in those price ranges for temporarily housing the chronically homeless.
#42 | Posted by A_Friend
Fair point.
How far away do we have to put the homeless, before they're not "neighbors."
So, the idea that homeless people are a thing to be put somewhere, by a government or a church, is not a healthy look.
It denies homeless people any sense of agency.
I'm surprised Republicans haven't been successfully lobbied by CoreCivic and GEO Group to simply criminalize being homeless.
We've got the camps already built.
"show me where raising the minimum wage has taken a bite out of homelessness."
I imagine it's probably the opposite.
Raising the minimum wage was predicted to lead to some minimum wage job losses.
It would follow that people losing their minimum wage are more likely to become homeless than people losing six figures.
To the larger point: show me where anything has taken a bite out of homelessness.
Significantly reducing homelessness simply costs more money than people are willing to spend.
This is without even considering the fact that there's a lot invested in making money off the poor. Payday loans. The ambulance that bring junkies to the hospital on the taxpayer dime. Medicaid providers whose business depends on people staying poor. Lottery tickets.
Once there's a financial incentive for things to push a certain way, that's the way they tend to go. If you're poor in this country, you are pushed towards being homeless.
You make rich people more money when you're on welfare and Section 8, than if you're just getting by on your own.