"#101 | Posted by Hans"

Thank you for your non-answer. As such, you have proven you are not a serious person and should be treated as such.

"Why should I, or anyone for that matter, waste any time trying to prove anything to a member of the Drudge Retort MAGAt Team?
#99 | Posted by Hans"

Well, you shouldn't if your goal is to simply lie and then pound on table and cry louder when confronted on the lie. However, if you are an adult that is actually interested in an honest discussion, you will either admit that those were all 'fake news' and the Democrats (including Kamala as recently as the last debate and MSNBC as part of their regular programing) should stop stating them as they are clearly false, or provide actual evidence that they are true. So, it depends on you and your next reply (or lack thereof) will clearly show us your intentions.

"#97 | Posted by Hans"

I didn't make my challenge only for Corky, I will accept your attempt as well. So, how about Sparky?

Which one of those points, which Democrats 100% defended as 100% true FOR YEARS, is actually true? Please tell us.

"Repetitious, no denial of his identity.... and proud to be mistaken for Alex Jones.
#95 | Posted by Corky"

Which one of those points, which Democrats 100% defended as 100% true FOR YEARS, is actually true? Please tell us.

US is just looking for coverage right now so that Iran does not target US assets in response to Israel's coming attack. US wants to make it look like there is disagreement and Israel acting on its own for diplomatic cover, but everyone with a functioning brain knows this is not true.

Because they want to know if they obviously cheat this time, will it spark a civil war.

"Wow! Alex Jones can post from prison.... who knew?
#90 | Posted by Corky"

Which one of those points, which Democrats 100% defended as 100% true FOR YEARS, is actually true? Please tell us.

"Tell me you're know nothing without telling me you're a know nothing.
#88 | Posted by oneironaut"

You don't understand the Left. When AOC says "There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right" - they mean what she says. For them, the "truth" does not need to align with actual FACTS as long as it feels right and you can walk around wrapped in a moral superiority cloak impervious to the ACTUAL FACTS that make you look like a douche.

"FoxNews often spreads lies and conspiracy theories.
#85 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY"

Conspiracy theories like Trump is a Russian agent?
...like the Hunter laptop is fake?
...like the Ashley Biden diary is fake?
...like that Trump told people to inject bleach?
...like Trump said the Charlottesville Nazi was fine people?
...like Obama did not lie to the FISA court to spy on Trump's campaign?
...like Biden is sharp as a tack?

You mean those types of conspiracies? Because despite each one of those being debunked YEARS ago, I still see them spouted as true on trash tabloid channels like MSNBC weekly if not daily.

The best defense against defamation is the truth. Kamala has no case here.

"Trump backs out of a '60 Minutes' prime-time interview, CBS says (October 1, 2024)
www.npr.org
#75 | Posted by lamplighter"

Trump made the 60 Minutes interview contingent on 60 Minutes apologizing for the lie they told last cycle about the Hunter laptop. Seems something completely normal to me. If the 'factchecker' was clearly lying in their last interview, it should be standard procedure to start the next interview with a correction for that error.

"Yeah, if the goal is to promote hatred and violence, yeah, X is now more transparent.
#66 | Posted by LampLighter"

As the liberals have fled Twitter to their own safe spaces, it has become much less violent and less filled with racial slurs. Also, they finally stopped liberals from posting child porn. Now, if Elon can get rid of the liberal onlyfans girls, it will be an almost perfect platform.

"As I have stated many times in the past, thanks for correcting me on that.
#64 | Posted by LampLighter"

Well, at least you were man enough to admit that just being plain old stupid was the cause of your error. Most liberals just stick to lying or run away from the discussion so I give you credit for that.

"Got links?
#15 | Posted by LampLighter"

They are in the link I posted above.

"And how many of those are actual people? As opposed to bots from Russia, etc?
#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

No answering a question with a question. You are not making your case any stronger with this nonsense.

"Why would (or should) a media organization release unedited video?
#51 | Posted by LampLighter"

You told me that they did in your prior link. So, was that an intentional lie or you were just too stupid to not know any better?

"#49 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

What is it that makes you liberal incapable to actually responding to the actual argument put forward? Linking to daily users in 2 selected markets to respond to my statement of 'engagement' is not responsive in the least when Twitter is completely transparent in how it measures engagement (hint: actual usage). It is attempting to cherry-pick data as you know you cannot respond to the actual argument in a truthful manner.

This was the same with Corky's totally non-responsive argument on the average income or GOP vs. Dem voters.

It is the same as Lamp still not linking to the unedited transcript or video from 60 minutes.

Why must you always resort to strawman arguments and avoid the actual argument being made? It this genetic? Diet/hormonal related or what?

"@#38 ... I didn't see that....
I provided a link in the comment your current alias replied to
#47 | Posted by LampLighter"

I clicked your link and did not see either the unedited transcript or unedited video. Maybe it is my version of chrome and blocking links or something. Can you provide the direct link to either?

"#13 | Posted by Alexandrite"

You voted for the daughter molester and now you are voting for team 'smack a bitch up', a pedophile disgraced teacher, and a former call girl. But, please continue on with your sense of moral superiority.

"He wasted 44 billion dollars buying twitter and destroyed it. He gets trolled and owned on his own site daily.
the guy is a ------- embarrassment.
#44 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Twitter engagement is at an all time high, meanwhile, traditional news is dying and laying off employees. On top of this, even your own braindead President used TWITTER, not the traditional MSM to announce he was dropping out. If that is your definition of failure, you need to be reset to factory settings. Twitter is the greatest free speech platform in the world today. But, keeping betting against Musk. Never worked in the past but maybe this time you will be right.

"biden is not.
deal with it.
#9 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Of course he isn't. He was ruled too mentally unfit to stand trial. Did you not follow the classified documents scandal?

"trump and musk inherited their money and theyre idiots.
#36 | Posted by Alexandrite"

Calling Musk an idiot is probably the greatest sign of TDS available - even better than nose rings and pink hair.

"They did.
So, what's yer point?
#34 | Posted by LampLighter"

I didn't see that. Can you link to it? I would like to watch/read it.

"Among upper-income voters (based on an adjusted income of $215,400 or greater for a household of three in 2022), 53% lean Democratic, outpacing 46% of wealthy voters who lean Republican."
#33 | Posted by Corky"

Now actually show a link the contradicts what I ACTUALLY SAID which was "the average income of the GOP voters is higher than that of the Democrats". We all know the Dems have the elites at the top controlling their welfare dependent slaves at the bottom. That is why the average Democrat has lower income tan the average GOP voter - because you have way more of the welfare dependent slaves at the bottom.

"Well, both things, according to CBS. Her full answer to the question was the two sentences put together " the first sentence used on "Face the Nation" and the second sentence on "60 Minutes."
#30 | Posted by LampLighter"

Wonderful! Then simply release the unedited clip and/or the transcript of the unedited clip.