#16 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-11 11:55 AM | Reply | Flag:

What you will not tell us is 2 things:

What happens when your grid goes down? You still have power or not?

And the difference in what that solar system cost you and what it saved you. Any maint. and repairs figured in also.

I don't think sending the homeless people to Alligator Auschwitz actually helps.
But since you do think it helps, tell us, how does that actually help?

#106 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-11 01:21 PM | Reply | Flag

I haven't seen where that's the case with the homeless, but aside of a steady supply of street drugs and cheap wine, it's probably a much better alternative for them.

Corky is a Christian. I am pretty sure Corky would have problem with aborting Jesus.

But if Jesus is a GOD then that would not (or should not) be in the realm of possibilities. In this universe.

#32 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-11 01:39 PM | Reply | Flag:

But Jesus(every late term blob flesh) wasn't a person in the womb, and Mary (every woman) should've had the right to do what she wanted to do with her body. Blah Blah Blah

Corky wears it on his sleeve when it fits his narrative.

Funny, she seemed perfectly happy with the outcome; being the mother of the savior of her people and of the world, which was her belief.

But hey. I get it. "New Atheism' was a terrible flop that alienated even agnostics with it's arrogance and dismissal of the opinions of others... based upon nothing other than its own
opinions.

Nobel Prize winners in Physics include agnostics, atheists, and theists alike, most of whom show no such arrogance given their understanding of how little they really know about life, the universe, and everything.

Especially as that knowledge changes quickly and dramatically almost annually.

Materialism has been taking a beating in the last few decades, no matter it's self assured adherents.

#27 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-11 12:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

Corky would have no issue with Mary getting a late term abortion... Make it make sense...

So, the solution to homelessness is... Government Handouts.
And you don't have a problem with that.

#103 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-11 01:12 PM | Reply | Flag

No I don't. Especially the part where the government helps the mentally ill/veterans help. You people bitch constantly about Regan causing the problem but when Trump want's to help you reply with - dUh gOvErNmEnT hAnDoUt!!!

With all the hoop stepping and twisting going on LftHndThrds needs a new name - maybe Dancing Queen?

#99 | Posted by YAV at 2025-08-11 12:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

The only queen here is you.

This is exactly what the President said and if you have a problem with it then that's on you.

"The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. WE WILL GIVE YOU PLACES TO STAY, but FAR from the Capital," Trump wrote. "The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong."

The NG assisted local PD during Katrina response. Again, that is something that I don't deny has happened and it has always been at the request and in cooperation with local/state government.

Also, I thought Trump didn't have the power to deploy the NG for an emergency in DC...

#95 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-11 12:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

There was no local PD. They all fled or became looters. Hummers, NG in uniforms, long guns slung, walking the streets and curfews.

So exactly what "feds" are you talking about.

I dont know the last time it happened, but the last time it happened for me was Hurricane Katrina.

Now do you really believe that the NG is going to go into DC and take over the entire operation? Lets get this part on record, moron. And the museums, monuments and reflection pools??? Be clear about your predictions.

Like Uvalde, Texas, or Kent State, Ohio?

#79 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-08-11 12:14 PM | Reply |

No, like Hurricane Katrina.

When was the last time a local PD was taken over and controlled by the fed government/AG?

#81 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-11 12:16 PM | Reply | Flag:

You really are stupid. DO you even read the articles at all - even skim it a bit? Or just straight to rage comment off a headline.

First of all it's an another ghost source - but lets go with that not being an issue here, we'll just take all of this at face value.

Secondly, From the article:

"One of the officials said it was unclear what exactly the troops would do, but could take part in efforts to protect federal agents or even carry out administrative tasks to free up law enforcement officials"

But your dumbass is already "predicting" what monuments and museums will be sealed off.

Hey dumbf*&^, they were doing their jobs. Unless you want to just say crime has been dropping spontaneously.

#80 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-11 12:15 PM | Reply | Flag

So Fake Doctor pDh is now the authority on what's going on crime wise in D.C.? I think not.

"dUh i pReDicT"

Even if Trump was half as bad as you say... You're still a 19%er - there are reason(s)

Democrats couldn't occupy the office of dog catcher these days.

I predict in short order they'll start installing security fencing and traffic barriers to begin closing off access to monuments, The Smithsonian ect while controlling/restricting traffic flow.

LA was initiate and normalize. DC is expand and normalize stripping of citizen's rights. I think y'all can guess what phase III will be.

#37 | Posted by jpw at 2025-08-11 09:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

Apparently this raetard has never lived in a location where the NG took over because local LEOs couldn't/wouldn't do their jobs.

dUh i pReDiCt cUz tRuMp

-I predict in short order they'll start installing security fencing and traffic barriers to begin closing off access to monuments, The Smithsonian ect while controlling/restricting traffic flow.

really? Why?

I've visited these sites several times in the past few years. What does Trump get out of closing off access to these places?

#49 | Posted by eberly at 2025-08-11 11:19 AM | Reply | Flag:

It's all in the moron's language... "I predict" No proof, no nothing, just gotcha --------.

You're being trolled.

That's it! I'm never voting for Trump again!

#32. Obama hadn't accomplished anything when the award was given.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-08-09 12:30 PM | Reply | Flag: NW

If I recall, the nomination period for Obama's peace prize ended on February 1, 2009.

In this case, Trump screwed over the country that was invaded that he promised to help... and let the invader keep the land they took.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-08-08 11:01 PM | Reply

Reaetard award goes to #1. Biden sat on in his chair and ate ice cream cones as Russia invaded Ukraine. Never gave a lick of effort to cool tensions. Now it's somehow Trumps fault.

19% there are reason(s)

That's the same thing as saying:
"We could run the country almost entirely with solar wind hydro and other renewables."
You just aren't honest enough or smart enough --probably both -- to admit that's true.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-09 07:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

You happily voted for the guy who said if he was President, he'd get rid of oil and gas. You're not very smart. You also made the claim Biomass was a renewable. Now that it's inconvenient for you, you lie.

You know who else uses solar? Oil companies. They operate well pads where there is no electricity of many miles. It has it's place but we're never going to run this country off of it or wind.

"according to two sources with knowledge of the matter"

I like my sources to have names.

You're not claiming oil is renewable any more?
The wells don't replenish after all?

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-09 05:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

Never did. You're the moron who claims that burning our forests to generate electricity is a renewable - bEcAuSe wE cAn pLaNt aNoThEr tReE!!!

While that is true it does make renewables any less important.

#24 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-09 02:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

Run all branches of the armed forces off of it then.

Which includes renewables

#20 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-09 12:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

That no where near match the energy produced by oil and gas.