So your only problem with forcing christianity on kids is that our pesky constitution mandates we'd have to treat other religious equally. How horrible.

#25 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-11-21 02:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

Is it impossible for you to make an honest comment?

If parents chose to raise their children in the Christian faith - or any other faith - that's their business. I keep my nose out of it and you should too.

Do YOU agree with the state? Is it ok to post the ten commandments in a publicly funded school? Is allowing schools to violate the U.S. Constitution ok with YOU?

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-20 03:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

No I don't agree with what was done but I don't agree with a lot of political shenanigans pulled by both sides. The main reason I don't agree with the 10 commandments thing is because once it's allowed, it opens up whole other can of worms for every religion out there to do it. My belief is that religion is best taught in the worship place and fortified at home.

I've seen police departments do something similar for people with outstanding warrants. They set up a fake travel agency in the strip mall and send those with outstanding warrants a notice of winning a cruise to somewhere. Works every time as long as you dont do it too often.

Who was the Fl sheriff back in the '90s who put up the marquee lighted sign "narcotics checkpoint ahead"? People would bail off in the median (illegal) to turn around... Classic

#4 | Posted by Native Americans as they watched the European ships headed their way for the very first time

#14 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 02:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

On a continent without laws. The Native American was still stuck in a stone age when the rest of the world was entering an industrial revolution, and they would still be hammering rocks into tools if it weren't for Europeans.

Where have the goal posts gone?!?!

#35 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 12:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Congress overwhelmingly rejected President Barack Obama's bid to derail legislation allowing families of the victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to sue the government of Saudi Arabia, handing him the first veto override of his presidency during his final year in office"

Idiots like you that don't get their spawn the jab, dumbass.

#12 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-11-20 12:59 PM | Reply | Flag:

Flag: failure

The only jab you got was from your step daddy.

"convicted of rape in 1972"

#3 flags were at half staff for Cheney. Google says it took .00006 seconds to find the answer.

#8 | Posted by Petrous at 2025-11-20 08:30 AM | Reply | Flag

iirc, it's law to lower the flag for these occasions.

- #12 More than a half-century ago?

I don't care when it was, as that wasn't what I was replying to. You called Homer a liar. Turns out you were lying.

You're not very good at this, Hans.

He was convicted, dumbass. Of course he would maintain his innocence in a country that he's not a citizen of.

If Americans were up to date on the measles vaccine, then the outbreaks due to the reason of your comment would likely be well-contained.

Vaccines -- that's why measles in US was considered to be eliminated, until the anti-vax movement took hold.

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-19 02:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

Title of the thread:

"CDC Data Confirms US May Lose Measles Elimination Status"

If a disease was eliminated how could it get introduced into our country once again? Wot else yer got?

#10 When all else fails, lie.

#11 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-19 07:08 PM | Reply | Flag:
| Newsworthy 1

"Although he was admitted as a lawful permanent resident under the Displaced Persons Act of 1948, Bojerski never became a citizen. Following a conviction for larceny and receiving stolen goods in his early 20s, Bojerski was ordered to be deported, reports the Sentinel"

"After his release, Bojerski ran into legal trouble again and was convicted of rape in 1972"

Now let's hear him defend the Saudis for 9/11.

Those losers in the twin towers were asking for it.

~ Pedo 47 ~

#32 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-11-20 12:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

Now tell us who made it impossible for the families of the 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabian government for their roles in the terrorist attack.

If it weren't for dishonesty and hypocrisy, you wouldn't have any character traits.

None of this would be happening if these people had not come in this country without an invite.

No takers on #57 and 59? "Hurry change the subject"

IF Trump is guilty of anything, the Biden Administration failed you and the rest of America miserably. So cast your anger where it belongs.

Publicly declaring (for political purposes) that you are FOR trying to pass clearly unconstitutional laws is a poor investment of taxpayer dollars for your citizens.

Sad that you do not know this. Are you from Texas? That could explain a lot.

#7 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-20 12:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nowhere did I say I was for any of that, I simply pointed out what it was meant to do. But you do you, and broad-brush everyone who doesn't blindly agree with everything you believe.

No, I'm not FROM Texas, but I do reside in Texas.

Luvsorangeturds voted for the demented------------------- who was taught by his klansman father to hate black folks.

www.nytimes.com

#60 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-11-20 11:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

Hey raetard, did you have a comment on #57, #59 or just an opportunity to plaster a lying liberal rag tucked behind a paywall?

#5 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-20 11:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

It's publicity and it's worth the investment, politically speaking. It's sad you didn't know this.

She's not without blemish

"The Florida Democrat has also been the subject of an ethics investigation into campaign finance issues and requesting community project funding, known as earmarks, to a for-profit entity, potentially in violation of House rules"

Annnnnnd, it worked just as planned. This was never not going to happen and everyone with half a brain knew it.

why do Democratic candidates, from city hall to the halls of Congress, always get the vast majority of the votes of people of color?

#58 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 11:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

Are you ------- blind? That isn't a bankable demographic for the DNC anymore, and it shows. It's why angry, little. racist, liberals like you get bothered enough about it to ask a black member here it he's a house N****r or a field N****r.

I'm sorry, did you have a comment on the late Senators quote from #57?

You're still saying democrats were the party of slavery. Despite democrats being the conservative party at the time. 200 years ago

#51 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-11-19 08:12 PM | Reply | Flag

The same Democrats who elected the guy who said this

"I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds"

to serve in the US Senate from 1959 - 2010?

*Boaz

You're still saying democrats were the party of slavery. Despite democrats being the conservative party at the time. 200 years ago

#51 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2025-11-19 08:12 PM | REPLY |

LMAO. You've got A_Friend asking Paz if he's a "house ni**er or a field ni**er" on another thread that's still up on the front page. Tell me some more BS