You already have that if you have Alexa...

It's funny, we put bugs in our own homes voluntarily and we like it that way.

He's doing his best to be a happy drunk.

He was fired for doing his job, nothing more. Not a political decision on his part, I'd wager.

That's a good point.

Having your balls visible during drag queen storytime.
#6 | Posted by boaz

I'm not sure which makes you crazier.

The fact that you think drag queens are going around showing their balls to children,

Or the fact that you think Democrats know it's happening and think it's okay and support it.

Both of those are just so far removed from the realm of possibility, and you can't tell that?

If this actually happened there would be arrests.

Nobody except Trump and the men in the Epstein Files and millions of men like them who are emboldened now that a------------ is in the White House think it's okay to have sex with children.

If it's not in the bath house, you probably wouldn't know.
#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It's 2025, you can just be openly gay now.
How are you not bored to tears with the horrible life you live?

Christopher F. Rufo
@realchrisrufo
"Adult males dress in women's clothing, flash their crotches, twerk to the floor, and swing prosthetic penises at small children in schools and libraries. Here's why conservatives are the bad guys."

This is just right wing propaganda.
What's described here isn't outrageous and neither are the pictures.

Seeing that this is Rufo, it's a given that this actually falls under:

But since you wanted a link,
Here you go...
komonews.com
#10 | Posted by boaz
Image of child on stripper pole at pride event draws criticism

So then don't let your child go to the Pride Parade.

This is just looking for excuses to be outraged.

Nobody is harmed when children support equal rights for gays and transgenders.

Imagine doing 35 in the military rising to the too and getting fired for speaking the obvious truth to a fat child molester.

"Anyone is able to go to either place, legally."

But then you might have to stand in front of your tacky mansion and wave your guns at the Black Lives Matter protesters.

And that makes you a victim too.

Any way you slice it you're a victim.

You do understand that the Arkansas thing is de facto, just as are the black zones?

No, it's not the same.

Whites not going places out of fear of non-Whites
is not the same
as Whites saying others aren't welcome.

Are you ever going to make a point or is the constant race-baiting the point?

"On weekends, the police would put orange construction barriers in some streets, with room enough to drive around them for the residents, but everyone understood these were no-go zones"

So the police segregated Atlanta.

What's your point?

"What's the big deal? Can't we all just get along?"

So you're okay with being afraid to go places?
Or Trump ought up clean them up for you.

"Know to avoid" is quite different than "excluded from."

Self exclusion is still exclusion.

The important thing is, White people are Victims, because there's sooo many scary places White people are afraid to go.

"I refer to de facto areas, not de jure."

I see. It's like saying Jews know to avoid moving into the White House.

Blacks used to know that, until they got uppity.

"There are areas white people know to avoid."

The places Trump isn't sending the National Guard?

So you can't name them either.

-I didn't realize the rich CEOs of these companies were Lefties.
At parties, fundraisers, etc......they are lefties.
but come Monday morning?
#18 | Posted by eberly

What exactly was Eberly's post supposed to mean?

Boaz, you don't know what it means to stand behind your word.

Because you know your word means nothing.

Just like when you swore the Oath Of Office, your words meant nothing to you.

I never said it happened.
I said that's one thing that can be defined as indecent exposure.
#9 | Posted by boaz

Coward logic.

"I know of more whites-excluded areas than white-exclusive areas."

Where?

Hopefully they subpoena Marco Rubio, and he says his previous report, the one that one might use to allege collusion, was an outright lie to the people of the United States.

"renewed allegations that Democratic officials tried to smear Donald Trump during his 2016 campaign by falsely alleging his campaign was colluding with the Russian government."

Where's the crime in alleging collusion, when collusion itself isn't a crime...

Liberal democrat blacks have been touting the "black only" spaces for years now. And it's a problem when whites do it?
#16 | Posted by boaz

It's okay when Liberal democrat blacks do it?

"accusations that the Obama administration manufactured intelligence."

Can't wait to see these accusations, and who's making them!

Better check his Long Form Birth Certificate while you're at it.