One difference, with Trump they get a hotel and golf course; with Clinton, Obama and Biden the only outcome is a trade of influence for personal enrichment.

What, in your opinion, is the subject of this thread what counter arguments are you in need of? Biden not corrupt enough for you?

Not my job to educate ignorant TDS sufferers; they're beyond reason.

A Biden/Harris supporter has no room to talk. Did you really believe them when they said Biden was alert, engaged and in charge?

Link to what?

Biden's autopen sent 93 billion into the ether; that was our money.

One difference, with Trump they get a hotel and golf course; with Clinton, Obama and Biden the only outcome is a trade of influence for personal enrichment.

Clinton, Obama, and Biden have done well too; motes and beams.

No C programmers were polled.

Sorry I fat fingered it. I've gained a lot of weight because every time I ---- your mom she makes me a sandwich.

Wow statistically insigniicant much?

JPW could you explain the science behind vaccinating six month old babies for Covid? Please include links to covid vaccine drug trials for infants.

One cause of our lower quality of care may be due to our poor allocation of resources. #BigPharmaAlwaysGetsWhatTheyWant

We're using science and our policy will be similar to matches the rest of the first world. If you feel bad for Pfizer send them your spare change. #myocarditis

Why wait? You have been gleefully threatening kill fellow Americans for years. That's Nazi.

All vaccines are not equal.

Sure why not. The insignificant benefit is worth the significant expense (for Pfizer shareholders).

Snoofy, that's actually a reasoned argument. I wonder how many six month old babies have asthma, cancer, liver disease, kidney disease, lung disease, diabetes, disabilities, heart conditions, mental health conditions, dementia, Parkinson's, obesity, pregnancy, physical inactivity, smoking.

"Certainly having two tickets is double the chances of hanging just one ticket." #116 | Posted by snoofy

Thanks for backing me up and restating what I already stated, bro!

Speaksoftly is smarter and has better knowledge and assessment of risk than 70% of healthcare workers?

"...American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations." Sorry Speaksoftly.

"...American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations." Sorry Donnerboy.

While all other high-income nations confine vaccine recommendations to older adults (typically those older than 65 years of age), or those at high risk for severe Covid-19, the United States has adopted a one-size-fits-all regulatory framework and has granted broad marketing authorization to all Americans over the age of 6 months.1 The U.S. policy has sometimes been justified by arguing that the American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations.

Based on arguments here I agree with "...American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations." Sorry Sally.

From the New England Journal of Medicine.

"Even health care workers remain hesitant, with less than one third participating in the 2023"2024 fall booster program."

Snoofy, I was quoting gaslighter. The question was for Danforth not you and google. Danforth do you understand that a number slighty larger than 0 is not infinitly larger than zero? If the odds of winning with one ticket are 1 in a billion, what are the odds with 2 tickets? Anyway, the risk of dying from covid for healthy people under 50 is low.

That's only true for non negative numbers. But it still doesn't make gaslighter's statement correct. Here's one for you. Is 1 greater than 0.999... repeating?