I still watch Colbert sometimes. Otherwise, the only reason I currently even keep my basic cable package is for football. I dropped my Paramount subscription when the Ellison's took over. Trouble is, the Ellison's really don't gaf about the ratings. Their living and wealth doesn't rely heavily on revenue from CBS/Paramount. They simply want to kill anything that may be perceive as biased against the fascist agenda.

At this point, he's not going to change anything based on a judges ruling. This regime feels no need to follow the law.

What is Nazi Noem hiding?
#1 | Posted by Corky

Pondering that question is a pretty dreadful prospect.

Mocking you for overusing the word "cultist"
#9 | Posted by BellRinger

Perhaps if we use "cultist" often enough you'll be too drunk to comment.

At this point, it's probably a calculation that it will help her keep her seat.

Enforcing immigration law is not fascism.

#33 | Posted by BellRinger

Door to door searches for undocumented immigrants are the literally equivalent of checking every vehicles computer to catch traffic violations. Now, would you care to comment on how you feel about warrantless computer searches? How much more privacy are you willing to relinquish to your overlords?

Vance: ICE Enforcement to Go Door to Door

So I'm a little curious about how all the "Don't Tread On Me" folks are feeling about this? But they seem to be remarkably absent from this thread.

..No worries. I'm sure the fascists will be along, twisting themselves into pretzels to justify this, anytime now.

Remember when Democrats were...?
#21 | Posted by oneironaut

Remember when OneNut didn't use a whataboutism is more than half its comments. /s

Just kidding! It has always been like this.

In this very site Snoofy and Twoothy cheered his death. So did LegallyGivesHead.

#53 | Posted by BellRinger

Some may have cheered his death. While I didn't cheer, I certainly didn't shed a tear for him either.

Some on the other side may also be cheering Goods death...

The biggest problem is the broad brush, as demonstrated by lfthndturds in #35 and that STD uses on a constant basis, that people on both sides often use in a variety of topics.

I agree with #26 | Posted by lfthndturds about one thing. There isn't going to be any trial.

Here's a 4:26 video of the shooting and the after... Why did the shooter leave the scene?

Hmmmm. This discussion is going just exactly as I expected it would on this site. Right down ideological lines.

Anyway... From the videos I've watched multiple times, although she grazed the masked person, she had clearly backed up and turned the wheel, and was attempting to drive around him. He opened fire after she had already cleared him. He hit her in the head from the side, through the drivers side window. She was NOT trying to run him over. That's how I saw it.

And fact is, if masked men approached my vehicle, I would have attempted to drive away as well.

that's a real nice welcome.... Dylan Mulvaney

#132 | Posted by shrimptacodan

Nobody even cared who she was until you morons lost your minds because Budweiser gave her a 6 pack.

"We're gonna end up with a democracy that works well. I mean, the people of Venezuela have lived under a democracy before, and they want a democracy," Sen. Rick Scott

Wait a minute! I thought Republicans hated democracy!

So, are we actually making the argument that mail in voting is MORE secure than in person voting?

#14 | Posted by BellRinger

Living in a state that votes mostly by mail-in/drop-box ballot, I'd make the argument that mail in voting is JUST AS secure. And certainly FAR MORE convenient. Why would you want to make it harder to cast legal ballots, except that you hope a certain contingent won't participate? I'd sure as hell rather fill out a ballot in a thoughtful manner at my kitchen table, than burn gas and wait for hours at a polling place. Until you can prove that the massive fraud you suspect is actually happening, ---- off.

Posted by john_savage1

Plonk

--- fascists.

#12

No. But I doubt if he'd have any qualms about running a gas chamber.

I can't decide if his meds are wearing off or if he needs more. Has anyone noticed that Trump is having more trouble than usual speaking lately? Lots of slurred speech.

DOJ hasn't complied? Why should they!? What do you think they are!? Public servants!!?

#16 | Posted by visitor_

By your observation, you don't understand that it took Hitler years to fully cross that threshold. IMO, Trump may not be there yet, but he's on an accelerated timeline.

#11 | Posted by oneironaut

And what do you expect to change as Trump eliminates all the Federal watchdogs?

"Stop Pursuing Oil Tanker"

Welp.... I guess Trump took the next step.

inspired by people that are wealthy and learn how to be self-sufficient

There is an oxymoron residing in there, somewhere.