Tuesday, April 29, 2025

GOP Wants to Charge Asylum Seekers $1,000

House Republicans are proposing to charge migrants $1,000 to claim asylum ...

Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 05:31 PM | 13 COMMENTS | permalink

More

https://media.vaticannews.va/media/content/dam-archive/vaticannews/agenzie/images/reuters/2020/11/11/16/1605108239481.JPG/_jcr_content/renditions/cq5dam.thumbnail.cropped.750.422.jpeg

Comments

"I voted for this."
Signed,
Republicans

cdn1.iconfinder.com

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-29 04:25 AM

Usual question: Who gets the money?

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-04-29 09:45 AM

#2: The USG gets the money, like when Americans request an expedited passport from the State Dept for $60. USCIS already charges fees for paperwork: my.uscis.gov

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-29 10:08 AM

"like when Americans request an expedited passport from the State Dept for $60."

It's $130 for a passport. Expedited is another $60 on top.

Passports used to be feee. That's right, there used to be a free Federal ID in this country that was valid for any Election.

If Republican's weren't using Voter ID to suppress the vote, Republicans would support a free Federal ID that is valid for any Election.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-29 10:17 AM

#2: The USG gets the money

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS

No, I mean who really gets the money?

This strikes me as another Trump grift.

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2025-04-29 10:24 AM

I meant $60 as an additional fee to the standard $130. Here's an old federal ID card that used to work: cdn8.openculture.com

#6 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-29 10:33 AM

" Usual question: Who gets the money?"

Most likely the treasury. It would likely be treated like a tax.

#7 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-29 07:57 PM

WOW How Christian of them.

#8 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-04-29 08:01 PM

It's $130 for a passport

Not for everyone, there are waivers for low income, battered spouse,

Passports used to be feee.

Before the US Civil War, thats when the US started tariffs too.

#9 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-04-29 08:09 PM

"thats when the US started tariffs too."

Completely wrong, the US started with Tariffs, 95% of Federal income was tariffs when George Washington was President. And 90% of Federal spending was the War Department.

Take your lies back to China, they will serve you better there.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-29 08:11 PM

That's right, there used to be a free Federal ID in this country that was valid for any Election.

Another lie, Voter ID laws came to the US in 1950, almost 100yrs after the Free Passports disappeared.

#11 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-04-29 08:11 PM

Completely wrong, the US started with Tariffs, 95% of Federal income was tariffs when George Washington was President. And 90% of Federal spending was the War Department.

It was a 5% tariff. Nothing to write home about. The US wasn't started with tariffs, it had to build the navy, because were muslims kidnapping US citizens. So it raised a tariff.

#12 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-04-29 08:15 PM


Take your lies back to China, they will serve you better there.

#10 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

You've lied in almost every post. When you post I can just search and find you are lying.

Why don't you do your own research instead of just flat out lying?

#13 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-04-29 08:16 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Two Israeli Embassy Staff Members Killed in DC (57 comments)

Are Democrats Fumbling a Golden Opportunity? (46 comments)

Deutsche Bank: U.S. Economy is Experiencing 'death by a thousand cuts' (43 comments)

Trump Tax Bill Will Cut Medicare (42 comments)

Majority of US Companies say They Have to Raise Prices Due to Trump Tariff (40 comments)

Second Amendment Foundation Challenges Connecticut's Under-21 Handgun Ban (27 comments)

Mississippi Tornado Survivors Await Assistance from FEMA (25 comments)

EU, Britain Add New Russia Sanctions Not Waiting for Trump (21 comments)

Trump Confronts South Africa's Leader with False Claims of White Genocide (20 comments)

Memphis Is Choking on Musk Pollution (20 comments)