Here's a quaint idea: If the government is going to punish someone, it should be for something the person has done, not the viewpoint he or she holds while doing it.
Antidiscrimination laws have made that distinction harder and harder to maintain. The Antisemitism Awareness Act would continue the trend. The AAA passed the House 320-91 last year, but on Wednesday it stumbled in a Senate committee as Democratic lawmakers and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) raised free-speech concerns. The pause is welcome because the legislation is flawed. But the real lesson is broader: America's civil rights model for managing diversity warps public debate and needs to be reconsidered.
The AAA would broaden the definition of antisemitism, essentially by defining anti-Zionism as antisemitic for the purposes of civil rights law. The legislation incorporates examples of antisemitism, including "applying a double standard" to Israel.
Drudge Retort Headlines
First American Pope (123 comments)
Missouri GOP Lawmakers Seek to Make Gold, Silver Legal Tender (65 comments)
Poll: Views in the 5 Years Since George Floyd's Killing (47 comments)
Bill Gates says Elon Musk Is 'Killing World's Poorest Children' (36 comments)
Trump Administration Increases Spying on Greenland (29 comments)
GOP to Pay for Trump Tax Cuts with Sales of Public Land (28 comments)
US-UK: What Trade Deal? (26 comments)
Kash Patel Shows Up at Budget Hearing Without a Budget (20 comments)
Fed Holds Interest Rates Steady (20 comments)
House Passes GOP-led Bill to Rename Gulf of Mexico (18 comments)