Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Comer Used Digital Signature for Autopen Investigation Docs

House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., used a digital signature to send out letters and subpoena notices related to the Biden autopen investigation.

Posted by qcp at 05:32 PM | 12 COMMENTS | permalink

More

NEW: Lead investigator into Biden's use of an autopen is using a lot of his own version of an autopen. www.nbcnews.com/politics/con ...

[image or embed]

-- Ryan Nobles (@ryanobles.bsky.social) Jul 15, 2025 at 6:59 AM

Comments

Bwahahaha

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-15 10:12 AM

Goober Comer doing all things Goober Comer would do.

Dear god, they couldn't write this guy any more incompetent if they tried.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-07-15 11:29 AM

The ESIGN Act of 2000 establishes the legal validity of electronic signatures on platforms such as DocuSign or the signature functionality of Adobe PDFs.
It has been widely accepted for over two decades.
Under the ESIGN Act of 2000 there are rigorous rules establishing the validity of an e-signature, including IP address tracking.

The autopen is not covered by the ESIGN Act of 2000.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-15 08:27 PM

... House Oversight Committee Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., used a digital signature to send out letters and subpoena notices related to the Biden autopen investigation. ...

Wow, I had to check if this was an Onion article.

It's not.

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-15 08:56 PM

NBC is such a complete joke of a news organization.

Esign/docusign and auto pen are two completely different things.

#5 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-15 09:40 PM

Esign/docusign and auto pen are two completely different things.
#5 | Posted by BellRinger

Oh, something you're an expert on.
What's the legal distinction you'd like to direct our attention to.

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-15 09:42 PM

Ballwasher the tRump taint lapping dog. ---- off, idiot.

#7 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-15 10:05 PM

Oh, something you're an expert on.
What's the legal distinction you'd like to direct our attention to.
#6 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

One is covered by the ESIGN act the other is not.
ncua.gov

#8 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-15 10:23 PM

LMAO... This went quiet real fast.

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-07-17 05:49 PM

Still waiting for the difference between Esign/docusign and auto pen, from that key legal perspective.

Keep trying new prompts, eventually ChatGPT will come up with something.

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-17 06:12 PM

The autopen is not covered by the ESIGN Act of 2000.

#3 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

I'm sorry. Remind me why this is an issue again?

New Rulz. You maga maroons made them up. You should freakin know them by now.

Rule#1
If the president does it then it's the law and so is by definition not illegal.
Rule #2
See rule #1 no other rules are necessary.

Or does this new rule only apply to Trumpy?

"NBC is such a complete joke of a news organization."

Unlike fixed news. Who pays good money to lie.

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-17 06:25 PM

Turdfyck the dumbass

#12 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-17 07:45 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Alarm on Disney Vacations Amid Florida Anti-Vax Move (71 comments)

Florida to Eliminate Vaccine Mandates (70 comments)

A Spectacular Diplomatic Disaster (25 comments)

Trump, Running Scared, Disses Victims of His Pedo BFFs (21 comments)

US Manufacturing Contracts for Sixth Straight Month (12 comments)

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Save His Emergency Tariffs (12 comments)

Iconic US Brand Warns of 'Rising Anti-Americanism' (11 comments)

Trump and Son's Stake in Crypto Grift Worth $5bn (10 comments)

U.S. Department of War (8 comments)

Trump Threat to Occupy Cities Takes Ominous Turn (8 comments)