Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Court official Dismisses DOJ's Misconduct Complaint Against a Federal Judge

A court official has dismissed a Justice Department complaint that accused a federal judge of "hostile and egregious" misconduct during hearings for a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump's ban on transgender troops ...

More

Chief US Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan dismissed a DOJ misconduct complaint against US District Judge Ana Reyes, saying the agency should have sought recusal instead. The complaint claimed Judge Reyes showed bias in handling Trump's transgender military service ban reut.rs/48109wz

[image or embed]

-- Reuters Legal (@legal.reuters.com) Nov 25, 2025 at 12:26 PM

Comments

More from the cited article ...

... The complaint accused U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., of inappropriately questioning a government lawyer about his religious beliefs and of trying to embarrass the attorney with a rhetorical exercise during a February hearing.

In a Sept 29 order that wasn't made public until Monday, Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the complaint. Srinivasan said a motion for Reyes' recusal would have been the proper means for the Justice Department to contest her impartiality and seek her removal from the case.

The department didn't explicitly ask for Reyes' removal from the transgender troops' litigation. And it didn't file a petition for a review of the chief judge's order, which didn't reach any conclusions about the merits of the complaint's allegations.

"If a party that believes a judge's conduct in a case raises serious questions about her impartiality were to press its concerns in the ordinary way -- by seeking her recusal in the case itself -- the standards for resolving the matter are well established," Srinivasan wrote. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-25 07:17 PM

These Trump bootlickers seem to know little about the law in the US. That lack of knowledge will not stop them from pressing such matters, in hopes of some aggrieved party not fighting back, or some friendly judge agreeing with them. As our president said (in another context): Fight, fight, fight...

#2 | Posted by catdog at 2025-11-26 12:16 PM

"standards for resolving the matter are well established,"

Standards? Standards?

The Presidents word is Law!

We don't need no stinking standards!

-Trumpy and the maga maroons.

#3 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-26 12:37 PM

#2 | Posted by catdog

Remember when now-MAGAts claimed they were the party of "law and order?"

Yet, somehow, they excuse January 6th, unconstitutional usurping the legislative branch with tariffs, violating the Emoluments Clause, and so much more.

Hypocrites. Every last one of 'em.

#4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-11-26 03:55 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Dems Force House ACA Vote (74 comments)

Trump Classifies Fentanyl as a 'weapon of mass destruction' (63 comments)

Unemployment Hits 4 Year High (43 comments)

Measles Spreads in Waiting Rooms (42 comments)

Putin Rules Feminist Protest Band an Extremist Organization (35 comments)

Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers In and Out of Venezuela (26 comments)

Trump Posts Outrageous Comment About Rob Reiner's Death (25 comments)

Trump's chief of Staff says he has 'an alcoholic's personality' (24 comments)

Brown University Shooter Still at Large (21 comments)

Trump Files $10,000,000,000 Lawsuit Against BBC (20 comments)