Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Court official Dismisses DOJ's Misconduct Complaint Against a Federal Judge

A court official has dismissed a Justice Department complaint that accused a federal judge of "hostile and egregious" misconduct during hearings for a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump's ban on transgender troops ...

More

Chief US Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan dismissed a DOJ misconduct complaint against US District Judge Ana Reyes, saying the agency should have sought recusal instead. The complaint claimed Judge Reyes showed bias in handling Trump's transgender military service ban reut.rs/48109wz

[image or embed]

-- Reuters Legal (@legal.reuters.com) Nov 25, 2025 at 12:26 PM

Comments

More from the cited article ...

... The complaint accused U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., of inappropriately questioning a government lawyer about his religious beliefs and of trying to embarrass the attorney with a rhetorical exercise during a February hearing.

In a Sept 29 order that wasn't made public until Monday, Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the complaint. Srinivasan said a motion for Reyes' recusal would have been the proper means for the Justice Department to contest her impartiality and seek her removal from the case.

The department didn't explicitly ask for Reyes' removal from the transgender troops' litigation. And it didn't file a petition for a review of the chief judge's order, which didn't reach any conclusions about the merits of the complaint's allegations.

"If a party that believes a judge's conduct in a case raises serious questions about her impartiality were to press its concerns in the ordinary way -- by seeking her recusal in the case itself -- the standards for resolving the matter are well established," Srinivasan wrote. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-25 07:17 PM

These Trump bootlickers seem to know little about the law in the US. That lack of knowledge will not stop them from pressing such matters, in hopes of some aggrieved party not fighting back, or some friendly judge agreeing with them. As our president said (in another context): Fight, fight, fight...

#2 | Posted by catdog at 2025-11-26 12:16 PM

"standards for resolving the matter are well established,"

Standards? Standards?

The Presidents word is Law!

We don't need no stinking standards!

-Trumpy and the maga maroons.

#3 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-26 12:37 PM

#2 | Posted by catdog

Remember when now-MAGAts claimed they were the party of "law and order?"

Yet, somehow, they excuse January 6th, unconstitutional usurping the legislative branch with tariffs, violating the Emoluments Clause, and so much more.

Hypocrites. Every last one of 'em.

#4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-11-26 03:55 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Stephen Colbert Defies CBS, Says Network Banned Him From Interviewing James Talarico (181 comments)

The Reverend Jesse Jackson Dead at 84 (67 comments)

11 People Killed in US Boat Strikes Monday (57 comments)

Chairman Resigns from Hyatt Hotels over Jeffrey Epstein (46 comments)

Republican Had Affair with Aide who Set Herself on Fire, report says (36 comments)

The Potomac Sewage Spill Is a Disaster (30 comments)

Georgia Father on Trial in Connection with School Shooting (23 comments)

Epstein Files Could Expose Crimes Against Humanity (22 comments)

Texas AG Candidate Aaron Reitz Vows to Destroy the Left (20 comments)

Epstein Sympathized with Brett Kavanaugh (14 comments)