Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, November 26, 2025

A court official has dismissed a Justice Department complaint that accused a federal judge of "hostile and egregious" misconduct during hearings for a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump's ban on transgender troops ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Chief US Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan dismissed a DOJ misconduct complaint against US District Judge Ana Reyes, saying the agency should have sought recusal instead. The complaint claimed Judge Reyes showed bias in handling Trump's transgender military service ban reut.rs/48109wz

[image or embed]

-- Reuters Legal (@legal.reuters.com) Nov 25, 2025 at 12:26 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the cited article ...

... The complaint accused U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington, D.C., of inappropriately questioning a government lawyer about his religious beliefs and of trying to embarrass the attorney with a rhetorical exercise during a February hearing.

In a Sept 29 order that wasn't made public until Monday, Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the complaint. Srinivasan said a motion for Reyes' recusal would have been the proper means for the Justice Department to contest her impartiality and seek her removal from the case.

The department didn't explicitly ask for Reyes' removal from the transgender troops' litigation. And it didn't file a petition for a review of the chief judge's order, which didn't reach any conclusions about the merits of the complaint's allegations.

"If a party that believes a judge's conduct in a case raises serious questions about her impartiality were to press its concerns in the ordinary way -- by seeking her recusal in the case itself -- the standards for resolving the matter are well established," Srinivasan wrote. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-25 07:17 PM | Reply

These Trump bootlickers seem to know little about the law in the US. That lack of knowledge will not stop them from pressing such matters, in hopes of some aggrieved party not fighting back, or some friendly judge agreeing with them. As our president said (in another context): Fight, fight, fight...

#2 | Posted by catdog at 2025-11-26 12:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"standards for resolving the matter are well established,"

Standards? Standards?

The Presidents word is Law!

We don't need no stinking standards!

-Trumpy and the maga maroons.

#3 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-26 12:37 PM | Reply

#2 | Posted by catdog

Remember when now-MAGAts claimed they were the party of "law and order?"

Yet, somehow, they excuse January 6th, unconstitutional usurping the legislative branch with tariffs, violating the Emoluments Clause, and so much more.

Hypocrites. Every last one of 'em.

#4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-11-26 03:55 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort