As long as this is here it doesn't matter who posted it.

Keep pushing that red line in front of them and see who finally breaks and who doesn't.

Wow, this news article ONLY quotes Colbert. No other perspective is given and no mention of even reaching out to CBS execs for comment.

#5 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Hey dumbf*^#, what possible information could you hear from CBS that would make this OK?

I knew your stupid ass would dodge the obvious. After whining out "duhhhhh PrAvDAz!!" for years when it wasn't true, suddenly you're giving the MSM the benefit of the doubt when it is true.

What a pathetic sack of unprincipled, disingenuous s^*%.

It's called responsible journalism. Something that is beyond your capacity to understand.

It is nice seeing lefties denounce censorship for a change even though it's totally situational.
#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Then this idiot tried to act all high and mighty as if he's not a giant hypocrite and walking know gobbling reach around.

You're a pathetic fool with zero consistency or standards, no matter what lies you tell yourself.

Here numbnutz, this all stems from Trump's FCC changing rules to target late shows.

A change that I don't even see how it arrives at a complete suppression of this interview.

But go ahead, act as if this is different and, therefore, why your incessant puling about non existent censorship is suddenly unnecessary when actual censorship is happening right under your nose.

No surprise you're still clinging to the giant flop known as the Twitter files.

Turley is a giant hack yet you can't seem to bring yourself to stop ------- his leg.

You cheered it when it was being done by Democrats.

Which didn't happen, dips*&^.

You continue to fall for and fail to recognize the pattern of the GOP getting out ahead of their own poor behavior by accusing the Dems of it and convincing their idiot base it's not a big deal because "the Dems do it too!"

You fall for it. Every. Time.

And continue to believe it even after it's clear that that's the real narrative.

I'm denouncing this precisely because I have actual standards unlike an unprincipled hack like yourself.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger

You aren't denouncing this.

You're running your usual play book - give some mealy mouthed, couched "denunciation" up front, then defend, deflect and ignore the actual practice of the concept.

You've done this multiple times over the last year.

I've done none of those things, moron.

#48 | Posted by BellRinger

You've done it at multiple instances where the administration was doing something blatantly illegal to normalize the behavior.

You've shown your "constitutional" principles to be nonexistent like the rest of MAGA world.

Lumpers support systemic racism.

#50 | Posted by oneironaut

Wow. Shocker.

Onelumpofs*&^ presents the administration's bulls*&^ rationalizations (which themselves rely on targeting Trump critics...) as valid and anything more than government censorship.

F*&^ off, idiot.

but just can't seem to get it through his thick skull how often people in his party lies about Trump and his administration.

Onelumpofs*&^ isn't even trying to hide his foreign paid agitator status anymore.

The only person saying this with a straight face are those with an interest in propagating the false narrative.

The "center" is a myth that supports the status quo, not changes it.

No, it's not.

You're selectively latching on to the few places and cases where an out of the norm candidate could work and want to act like it will apply outside of those spaces.

The worst thing progressives do EVERY TIME is think they're just on the cusp of acceptance because [insert highly interpretative reason here], only to find nope, they're not and they lose hard.

The real myth is that progressivism is the winning ticket held back by the middle.

Progressive to want our tax dollars to pay for healthcare, education and our communities rather than the obscenely wealthy, the military complex, the police state.

I got bad news for you.

Most of the middle wants this stuff too. Why do you think these topics usually poll well within the electorate at large?

You don't have to find the middle. It's right in front of your face.

What happens to make "the left" lose the middle is they go beyond those core issues and start pushing social issues ahead of the core issues.

That is when people turn off and either stay home or vote for someone else.

Those are the 33%- > 50% of Americans who are eligible to vote, but fail to show up when it counts.

Failing to show up in 2024 was inexcusable because they allowed complacency to blind them to the unique nature of the threat. They assumed it was all systems nominal normalcy.

Pre-Trump, the most frequent driver of those folks staying home was the fact that both parties often turned them off and they didn't find either side compelling enough to earn their vote.

It's a magic act, and that magic act is getting the party people that talk to much to shut the ---- up already.

#78 | Posted by sitzkrieg

The major take away from the recent electoral blowouts was, IIRC, to run a candidate who matches the district. Running some CA librul preaching pink hair for all, they/them birthing people who produce eggs reparations while also giving everyone all the free s*&^ they want isn't going to work in a district in suburban Kansas or Texas or Michigan...

But I'm sure that message will be ignored and a bunch of progressive fruit loops will take it as a sign that "not Trump" is a viable strategy again and will do anything but STFU.

Colbert and Talarico are the ones engaged in propaganda.

#124 | Posted by BellRinger

Good ol' Gutes Deutsch never ceases to disappoint.

Against censorship and "Pravda" right up until it's the righties doing it. Then it's the evil Dems who are actually the propagandists!

What a f*&^ing stooge.

That's poli sci 101 stuff.
Minimum Differentiation, Hotelling (1929)
Median Voter Theorm, Black (1948)

#101 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Yet this is a constant stumbling block for Dems.

I was repeating what was said in media articles by prominent Dems following the wins.

The same CBS being run by a right wing moron who was placed solely because she's Trump's kind of loon? The one that has already squelched stories critical of Trump?

You're a f*&^ing idiot. Only question is whether it's intentional or not.

Bari Weiss is a center left moderate.

LOL

She got a taste of the MAGA victim complex and jumped onboard. She's anything but what you claim she is, idiot.

Why do you think she was placed in charge of CBS despite having zero qualifications to be in that position? And why do you think she's gone out of her way to squash stories critical or unflattering for Trump?

You literally have zero clue of what reality actually is but you speak as if you're some wise old sage.

Some of the criticisms are legitimate but damn, that piece read like an op Ed, a heavily biased one at that.

#145 | Posted by BellRinger

LOL believes Beri Weiss and the weaponized FCC while calling an outside assessment an "op ed" that is "biased."

STFU ballwasher, you pathetic stooge.

All your puling about non-existent censorship under Biden and you immediately fall in line when there's clear government interference and control of media.

Idiot.

Gee, his story changed. Yet JPW buys it hook, line and sinker. And then mocks anyone who approaches Colbert with even a hint of skepticism.

#162 | Posted by BellRinger

That's not a change in story, dips*&^.

You have nothing but an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. I already showed that Colbert lied QUOTING HIM DIRECTLY. You have a narrative. You are an excuse driven useful idiot.

#186 | Posted by BellRinger

LOL you don't even know what these terms mean. It's not conspiracy theory at all, numbn*&s.

Yes, he did. Do you need me to refer you back?

#187 | Posted by BellRinger

You're the kind of person who thinks public health officials updating guidance based on new information means they were "lying."

So don't bother wasting your or my time because what he said in those two quotes aren't a changed story or a lie, idiot.

You people are so divorced from reality. It is truly astonishing to watch.

#188 | Posted by BellRinger

This from the dumbf*&^ who couldn't stop ------- Jonathon Turley but now fully supports obvious political influence in media.

The primary thread in all you ----- into the universe, ballwasher, is the willingness to swallow anything this administration and MAGA gives you, no matter how contradictory or false it is.

Funny part is I don't even think you're aware you're doing it.

they will always put their thumbs on the scale to get their preferred candidate through the primary

Wait. Suddenly it's controversial for a political party to...support their candidate for a particular run?

First you tried to let Weiss and the FCC off the hook for doing everything you couldn't stop claiming the Dems were doing from 2020 to 2024, and now you're so desperate to attempt the 'duhhh DeMz ArE RaCisTz!' angle you're going to act like a party supporting a particular candidate for a race is somehow scandelous?

Just STFU you idiot.

This is a manufactured non-controversy and because your tongue is so far up the DNC's rear you are incapable of seeing it. Trump lives in your tiny head.

#193 | Posted by BellRinger

Just put your Trump flag up, sign up for half a dozen auto-enrolled MAGA donation chain letters telling you you're the heart of America and start getting all your "news" from FaceBook memes like msgt.

You're cooked. Not sure you were ever really bringing much to the table, but what little there was is looooong gone.

Perhaps the funniest thing is, if "equal time" were to be invoked it would give a platform to 2 other Democrats. Republicans aren't even in the equation on this because this is a Democrat primary.
But, JPW laps it all up like a willing dupe, per usual.

#195 | Posted by BellRinger

Funny thing is you actually think anyone here would object to that because you're f*&^ing stupid enough to believe that's what this is all about.

Again, just f*&^ off. You no longer offer even a modicum of useful thoughts or opinions.

Yep. This has been a very successful hoax. Smollet is taking notes.

#200 | Posted by BellRinger

Duhhhh HoAx!!!

Idiot.

It's not particularly democratic but it's not controversial.

#208 | Posted by BellRinger

The parties are, for better or worse, are private entities who can support whoever they want.

It's only undemocratic when they restrict people from running, which they do not.

BTW it's also rich coming from a J6 supporter and Trump sycophant who will, undoubtedly, support sham elections this November while spewing the spoon fed talking points.

I've owned you on this thread with Colbert's own words. All you have is unsubstantiated conspiracy BS.

LOL sure, sport.

Hey ballwasher, you gonna chirp about government censorship on this one too?

LOL