People like you are the problem, stealing liberty wherever you can...
#14 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Couldn't disagree more.

People like [BOAZ] continually demonstrate you are the problem.
#15 | POSTED BY YAV

Couldn't agree more.

Get off your high horse, BOAZ. The constitution does NOT kneel to your ends.

That makes sense. An ex-girlfriend is a anti-vaxxer, home-schooling, yoga instructor in Montana. She's a big Q person. Had to block her on social media because she kept sending me private messages about satanic child molesters in government.
#28 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE

Dodged a bullet on that one, HC!

Kudos.

If dems don't play by those rules, they'll lose, and a small minority of morons will succeed in preventing a solid majority from fixing anything in the country.
#12 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

Their going to lose anyways. REpublicans are quite adept at spinning ANY Dem lead policy as "SOCIALISM!" or "anti-American!" no matter how bi-partisan or crucial for the country the policy is.

They need to take a page out of the Republicans play book and shut out the opponent for 2 years, tell the voters "We're making these changes because you gave us the power, so suck it up!" and do what they think is best. Republicans have been doing exactly that since at least 2012 (it seems like), so it's time to turn the tables.

If the Dems don't, they go right back to the spineless bastards that I've witnessed growing up. Nothing ever changes with these people, not even the people themselves (term limits anyone?).

Senior Frog's
#45 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Was tame by the 2000s. Safaris is where the ---- show was at its best while I was in college.

I'm amazed he didn't pardon his family.
#9 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

I still think he did and we won't find out for sure until they are charged.

What are you saying when you riot, carrying signs saying "We won't be governed," or We don't want Biden, We Want Revenge."
#52 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

There's a reason "rioters" and "insurrectionists" are distinguished from each other.

I do not understand why you're REFUSING (as in willfully choosing) to distinguish the two. Had the rioters in Portland wanted to overthrow the government like Trump's MAGAts, they would have gone to the capitol to do it, you know, cuz that's where the federal government is located, traveling to it being a requirement to enact an insurrection (again, exactly what the MAGAts did).

Hence, you continue to put forth ANOTHER false equivalence. You're struggling today, what gives? What happened?

Those are your people, champ. Those are your MAGAts.
#52 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Pfffft hahaha

Yeah, sure, whatever you say. "Your people, champ."

So lazy you are today. What's wrong? What happened?

Most people who have lived under socialism will tell you that.
#53 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

HAHA! Poor retort. Again, the nuts elected to congress on the Right are FAR more delusional than the socialists infecting our government. At least the socialists will acknowledge basic science.

Give me a fnckin' break LOL

You're my case in point for left-wing hypocrisy.
Maybe if you get bored, you can buy some Che/Mao swag and join your fellow comrades breaking ---- and hitting people in Portland.
It doesn't seem like that will be ending any time soon.
#50 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Your accusation of hypocrisy is far of base considering the comparison is faulty. Portland is not the center of our democracy, the Capitol is.

Why do you insist on putting forth such a false equivalence?

"Furthermore, democrats ostracize their extremists. Republicans ELECT theirs."
Do they?
#39 | Posted by madbomber

If you would simply pull your head out of the sand, you'd know that they do.

JFC.

But if there was a lying, cheating, stealing progressive that was able to advance the progressive platform, you would without a doubt be as rabidly in favor of that candidate of any Trump supporter who stormed the Capitol two weeks ago.
#47 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Wow. Accusing someone of being a potential insurrectionist is pretty hard core, even for the DR!

Ballsy move, MAD.

He can do that?
#7 | POSTED BY REDIAL

I wonder if Trump's unprecedented move to provide his children full SS security detail for 6 months has anything to do with potential legal issues.

I don't see how it would benefit them, but this is Trump. Maybe he's really banking on the loyalty of those SS agents to go above and beyond to protect the Trump kids. He's ------- delusional, so I wouldn't put it past him.

MAD -

Curious why you ignored this portion of his post: "Furthermore, democrats ostracize their extremists. Republicans ELECT theirs. Repubs just sent a Qanon cult member to congress. Have dems sent any communists, marxists, anarchists, or antifa members to congress?"

#44 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE

Your hyperbole is duly noted and will be considered in future conversations. Hope the feels aren't too sore.

God speed.

imgur.com
#3 | POSTED BY JPW

A) That's the best picture I've ever seen of Eric.
B) I bet Trump would do exactly that if he could actually get that hairline.

And these are the idiots who replayed this over and over for four years.
www.youtube.com
Now they're crying because their insurrectionist POTUS lost.
#9 | POSTED BY JPW

That video is amazingly apropos today. First time I've seen it, thank you for sharing.

Madness.
#7 | POSTED BY ZED

These people's behavior led to the death of 5 at the capitol, a failed insurrection, and god knows how many people dead from C-19 based on misinformation and lies. And now "Okay folks, time to pack it up and go home."

As though their local minor league baseball team just lost a playoff game, ending their season. "There's always next year" is the feel I get from these posts. Simply amazing the lack of self-awareness and accountability. Absolute ------- delusional cowards every last one of them: 75% of Republicans still do not view Biden election as legitimate.

Suck it up, you cucks.

Seems University of Subway didn't stress using spell check.
#27 | POSTED BY MENSAMAN

Womp womp.

Did your dad teach you the art of the retort?

"You don't get it done no pardon for you"

That some real mafia ---- right there.

doesn't seem to make sense regarding conviction/exoneration.
#17 | POSTED BY AMERICANUNITY

There's a lot tied to impeachment, politically, that doesn't make sense to me. I agree with you.

B. Giuliani could retain his .000 batting average over claims Trump won the election he lost, bigly
#11 | POSTED BY AMERICANUNITY

Rove points out that it all comes down to Trump's defense. If Rudy brings the argument that there is evidence of wide spread voter fraud, which legitimizes Trump's message and justifies the insurrectionist actions enacted by his supporters, there's a significant likelihood of conviction. Practically any other defense will lead to acquittal, according to Karl. But we've seen Karl swing and miss many times, so who knows.

I really have to wonder if Mr Giuliani would be a positive or a negative for the Trump defense.
#7 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Here's Rove's take:

"carry lethal weapons". Yes, they are carrying them, empty. Some officers have pistols.
#15 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

A "lethal weapon" is not lethal if it's not loaded. Just ask the 2nd amendment crowd.

And nobody had any idea when I posted it was absurd because they're too far gone to even question it a little bit.
#2 | POSTED BY JPW

A very interesting read: