Why were you lying, Bellringer?
#40 | Posted by Danforth

He wasn't lying. He just really is that -- ck in' ignorant. Albeit, will--lly.

Have you ever heard a Democrat demand answers about water and energy use? No? Yeah, ---- you.
#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

HAHAHA!!! You dip ----.

#35 | Posted by El_Buscador

I too have wondered that for a while. But the common response is the high cost, yet with news such as this, investments into desalination may now be worth while. You know, supply and demand....and all that nonsense.

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You need to explain why you voted for this, cultist!

Obama kills Bin Laden. Trump gives his cousins a nuke.

You MAGAts have a lot of explaining to do.

bizarre how?
#31 | Posted by eberly

It's bizarre because "I don't NEED anything to be true" is not some noble declaration of intellectual purity. It's a passive-aggressive way of implying that everyone who disagrees with you is emotionally dependent on the claim being true.

Nobody said you had to "need" anything. The issue is whether the situation looks suspicious, whether the branding/location/timing are politically useful, and whether there's enough evidence to draw a stronger conclusion.

So yes, "I don't know" is perfectly reasonable. But wrapping it in "because I don't NEED anything to be true" turns a basic evidentiary point into a weird little self-congratulatory morality pose. You and Bill Johnson need some self-awareness training very very badly.

What Trump has awakened will not end with his presidency.
#20 | Posted by BillJohnson

Which is exactly what a cultist would say. You have ZERO self-awareness.

Frankly, the TDS exhibited by some liberals makes them look like nut jobs themselves.
#10 | Posted by BillJohnson

Jesus Butt Loving Christ, you cultists are such -- ck ing suckers!!! HAHAHAHA!!!

because I don't NEED anything to be true.
#28 | Posted by eberly

What a bizarre point to make.

So fascist.

Nobody likes a fascist. Except fascists.

#47 | Posted by ClownShack

BillJohnson quit?

---- that guy.

"Trust me bruh!"

Well did the Dems do what you say is possible or not? Because the system in place wasn't established solely by Democrats. The system was developed as is through bipartisan efforts. There are more Republicans in California than any other state, even some states combined. Which means Republicans are ALSO at fault for this "rigged" electoral system. Even more so, they keep showing up every 2 years to get their names on the ballot. You cultists won't ever take accountability, however, so no surprise you'll ignore this post, VISITOR.

Are you incapable of seeing why this has the appearance of fraudulence?
#60 | Posted by BellRinger

I addressed your concern and you ignored the substance of my post. You ASSume California lacks any and all measures to stop fraud. In fact, you suggest it's purpose--lly inbedded into the electoral process to ensure Dems win. Yet you provide ZERO evidence. In fact, the dip chit Trump sent out here to monitor the election just wwnt on Glenn Beck's program BEGGING for people to send him evidence of fraud. So, no the appearance of impropriety is none existent. Were you chuckle -- kcs crying about California election fraud in 2024? 2022? 2020? Did the Dems rig the election for Schwarzenegger? You cultists are unhinged with this crap.

Swallow it.

The people deserve to know the outcome of an election on Election Day,

Why the ---- do you care, JEFF? Part of the reason it takes so long is that there are so many ballots and protocols must be followed to ensure fraud was not committed. By your standard, all ballots should be counted and a candidate should be rushed to the podium to declare victory by EOD. You think that's a practical way of ensuring election integrity? Just because you think the voters deserve it? HAHAHAHA!! JFC you people are more twisted than a bag of pretzels!!

Turns out throwing away all credibility with the Dem panic plan-demic had negative consequences.
#5 | Posted by visitor_

Trump was at the helm for Operation Warp Speed, you dirt rotten cultist! Hahahaha!!!

The next president might just nationalize and seize all the assets of anyone associated with the previous admin. It wouldn't surprise me, since that looks like where the state of politics is right now.
#8 | Posted by sentinel

Considering the blatant corruption of this administration, I hope it happens.

#57 | Posted by jpw

Hey EBERLY, have you figured out why Jeff is the most-responded-to poster here?

Grants statehood to Chicago and NYC. The existing Senators are assigned to those two cities and the 4 new Senators are voted on by the rest of the state. NYC and Chicago both have larger populations than DC.
#50 | Posted by BellRinger

See people, this is what "crashing out" looks like. Take heed.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger

How did it work for Hawaii and Alaska, you dirt-rotten cultist?

Did you sleep through 2021?
They pushed for all of that and still are. Manchin Sinema were openly opposed to it and became public enemies on the left. Hell a small group of lefties followed Sinema into a public restroom and filmed her emptying her bladder because they were pissed off she would t sign on.
#33 | Posted by BellRinger

Once again, ZERO specifics. JFC, why do you even bother with this s _ h _ i _ t?

I hope you are right.
#32 | Posted by BellRinger

How would it impact you if all that came to fruition?

Trump trying to Rename the Kennedy Center is pure trash but it's nothing compared to what Dems will do with the most razor thin levers of democratic power.
#22 | Posted by BellRinger

Wow! What a----- in' cop out!

When I saw that part of the legal reasoning I didn't need to dig any deeper.
#19 | Posted by BellRinger

Is this the thing that keeps you from voting Republican/Trump this November/2028?

I glanced at the legal ruling and it makes sense. The center's name was created by Congress and Kennedy was chosen because he was recently assassinated. So, it follows that a name change would have to come from Congress.
#16 | Posted by BellRinger

Just a glance? Good for yoooou!!!