Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. The diagnosis was announced by his personal office on Sunday, May 18, 2025, following a period of increased urinary symptoms that led to further medical evaluation. read more
A federal judge has blocked the Biden administration from deporting noncitizens to countries not listed in their removal orders without first giving them a chance to raise safety concerns. The ruling requires the government to notify affected individuals and provide at least 15 days for them to contest their deportation if they fear danger. The judge said deporting people without this process could lead to serious harm, such as torture or death, and violates basic legal protections. The order applies to all noncitizens with final removal orders.
"ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and Claude all recommend the same 'nonsense' tariff calculation." read more
Bradley Bartell, a Wisconsin resident and Trump voter, is considering leaving the United States after his wife, Camila Muoz, was detained by federal immigration officials[1]. Muoz, a Peruvian citizen, overstayed her visa while in the process of obtaining permanent residency[1]. Bartell expressed to Newsweek that he is "seriously thinking about moving to Peru" if his wife is deported, though he acknowledges the difficulty this would pose for their 12-year-old son[1]. This situation highlights the broader impact of the Trump administration's extensive deportation initiatives, which have expanded to include nonviolent offenders and those without gang affiliations[1]. read more
His administration is suddenly changing tactics after a federal judge ruled that its mass firings of probationary workers were probably illegal. read more
The end of the de minimis exemption strengthens the argument that Trump is taking a hard line on China, not caving. However, the economic pain will be felt by American consumers, not Chinese exporters, which complicates claims of a clear "win." The trade deal's failure to restore the exemption means the U.S. is not backing down on this front, even as it negotiates on others. This move is being spun as a victory by the Trump administration, but it comes with significant costs for U.S. shoppers and small businesses.
Citations:
[1] www.reuters.com
[2] www.avalara.com
[3] www.reuters.com
[4] www.cnbc.com
[5] www.whitehouse.gov
[6] www.reuters.com
[7] www.cbsnews.com
[8] www.pbs.org
[9] www.vatcalc.com
[10] www.strtrade.com
The perception of the U.S.-China trade deal as a "win" for Trump or a concession to China depends on the perspective and source:
- U.S. Government and Trump's Framing: The White House and President Trump are portraying the agreement as a historic win for the United States. The administration highlights the reduction of Chinese tariffs, the elimination of retaliatory measures, and a path toward increased market access for American exports as evidence of a successful negotiation that benefits U.S. businesses and workers[5].
- Chinese Perspective: In China, state media and the public see the deal as a victory for Beijing. Chinese commentators emphasize that their firm stance resulted in the U.S. rolling back steep tariffs (from 145% to 30%) while China made minimal concessions, mostly retracting retaliatory tariffs. Chinese social media is celebrating the outcome as evidence that China did not yield to U.S. pressure[1].
- Independent and Market Analysis: U.S. and international analysts note that the Trump administration retreated from its highest tariffs, which were causing economic strain domestically. The deal is viewed as a pragmatic pause to avoid further economic pain rather than a clear-cut win for either side. Some experts argue this is more of a tactical retreat by the U.S., as the administration had previously insisted tariffs would not be reduced without substantial Chinese concessions, which have not fully materialized[2][3].
- Wall Street Reaction: Markets responded positively, with stocks rallying on the news, as the agreement reduces the risk of a recession and restores trade flows, at least temporarily. However, the underlying issues in the U.S.-China trade relationship remain unresolved, and the deal is seen as a temporary measure rather than a definitive victory[4].
While the Trump administration claims a win, Chinese officials and much of the independent analysis suggest the U.S. made significant concessions to de-escalate the trade war. The agreement is best described as a mutual de-escalation that both sides are spinning as a victory, but with China widely seen as having secured favorable terms with minimal concessions[1][2][3][5].
Citations:
[1] www.cnbc.com
[2] www.nytimes.com
[3] www.reuters.com
[4] www.investors.com
[5] www.whitehouse.gov
[6] www.foxbusiness.com
[7] www.usatoday.com
[8] www.bbc.com
[9] www.youtube.com
[10] www.barrons.com
#67 | Posted by cabron_loco
Pffft HAHAHA! You ------- cultist.