A Rolls Royce is a snooty pretentious car for snooty pretentious folks.
#33 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

I took an older model to prom. Was decent ride, really comfortable. Until it broke down and the German driver had to huff and puff (I think there was a crank involved, can't rememeber) to fix it. So felt bad for him, but overall was unique idea. Enjoyed it.

The judges award Yav $1000 for Vocabulary for use of the word "flagitiousness."
#15 | POSTED BY CBOB

Flagitious is a fancy and forceful word for "wicked and nasty."

Fancy and forceful. Describes YAV to a t.

#9 | POSTED BY HOMERJ

Follow this:

270towin.com

Far more accurate as it relates to the EC; vast majority of 2016 polls being highlighted as wrong focused on popular vote, which HRC won.

What about the giant elephant of an 'if' in the room that's sitting on everyone's chest like a COVID infection?

Are we going to ignore the inevitable economic ramifications of a second wave? Worse, Trump is actively trying to hasten the second wave by insisting ALL schools open in the Fall. I really don't think he subconsciously wants a second term; this would be the only valid explanation regarding his recent behavior.

Whelp, Trump is referring to this as a witch hunt, so we all must now know that there's criminal substance to the investigation.

Trump wear's his tells on his sleeves amazingly well. Wish I could get in on a game of cards with that -------.

If the number of comparative deaths is sufficiently small enough, you have a strong argument for getting your client off. Or so I would think.
#33 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Not necessary.

His badge and union will protect him.

You're digging too deep into the weeds.

"Did Trump overvalue assets to get loans, but then undervalue the same assets for tax assessment purposes?"

Those are the exact accusations Mary Trump has made against her uncle that helped him screw her out of millions in inheritance monies.

I'm of the opinion that cop is going to walk...
#25 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

Hate to say it, but I agree.

this will for sure get that bad orange man out office like the impeachements and russiangate did said the nervous Social Justice Warrior for the 334343th time....
#2 | POSTED BY MUTANT

Did you mistakenly post this here? Or are you spamming? If it's the latter, you must be really hurting today.

I empathize with you, fully. Hopefully, it will all be over come January 20, 2021. We both can rest then.

Nobody made you do it.
#27 | POSTED BY LEE_THE_AGENT

Except for the racists. The racists may have made them do it: "I like Trump cuz he speaks his mind. He thinks like me."

#21 | POSTED BY MUTANT

This means more than just about Trump. And no, this decision will not lead to his ouster.

The significance is far greater than the Orange Turd in Chief.

Sons of bitches in Scientology got a massive chunk too.

One of my favorite restaurants went under because they were not afforded enough PPP bailout. Just a smidgen re-appropriated to that restaurant from the chunk given to the cult of scientology could have saved them.

Protectors of rapists just received a lot of tax payer money while mom and pop shops are shuttering. Let that sink in.

I'm happy.
#4 | POSTED BY HELIUMRAT

You're lying to yourself.

You may be content. But if you consider yourself happy in the current environment, I question whether you've sincerely ever felt the feeling.

#5

I thought the same thing, then heard they'll be soon upping the salary cap.

KC struck gold.

NATO be next.

NULLI would agree.

how are Dems going to apologize to the nation for their hatred and spreading of fear?
#29 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE

Not answering for any dems, but their opposition has NOTHING to cry about considering the -------- GW and Cheney put us through for 8 years.

HUMTAKE's memory that short? Pity. Context is important during the run-up to November.

Silly, BOAZ.

You're putting the cart before the horse.

#70 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE

I've been following our comments about this matter and find you to be far more convincing.

And you're suggestions have been corroborated on other websites that I frequent.

The couple in question had no reasonable fear of their lives. If they had, they would not have exposed themselves (barefoot and all) beyond the walls of their refuge. The idea that they were attempting to protect their property is based on the hypothetical that the protesters exhibited violence, which the only evidence suggesting that happened involved a gate at the entrance to the community. Was the couple aware of the gate's destruction prior to walking out of the house? Sincere question, that would justify a modicum of fear. But even so, that justification is swiped away the minute they step foot outside of their confines pointing weapons at people. I'll explain more on this point in a minute...

No matter what right you have to 'protect your property,' your egregious actions must be justifiable based on a reasonable sense of fear. A comparison to the liquor store owners during the L.A. riots is an apt comparison here to illustrate how the situations are apples and oranges. Liquor store owners had seen the rash of looting and destruction leading up to their decision to take action. Stores around their businesses had already been looted and burned, reasonably justifying their sense of fear. This situation had no such context for the couple to consider. The only sense of danger they had came from what they were watching on TV that was taking place outside of their community. They made an immediate association, that was based on hyperbole, that influenced their reaction.

It's one thing to walk outside of your protective confines with an AR-15 slung over your shoulder (many anti-quarantine protesters proved this), just observing the group walking by. It's a totally different situation to hold your weapon at the ready, engaging in taunts with the crowd, and occasionally pointing the weapon at the people. That's not reasonable behavior as a reaction to reasonable fear.

I ask, please someone, convince me otherwise.

I would make a show of force too.
#79 | POSTED BY E1G1

Why?

They weren't trespassing. Look up the definition if you need to, but a show of force against a group of people walking by is reasonable on what planet?

Or did this couple, and would you hypothetically, have a sense of guilt behind the wonder of why this group of people are walking down their (your) street?

IOW, what did they (you) do to expect violence to come upon your front lawn (that never actually materialized, but they [you] were so worried about)?

#26 | POSTED BY BILLY_BOY

This has less to do with the Taliban than it does with Trump and Russia. The point being that Russia is doing this while also begging Trump, who is following right along, to advocate for Russia to be let back into the G7.

Again, Trump is going right along with it. So, should this all be true, especially the part that Trump has known about it for months if not a year while simultaneously advocating for Russia's re-admittance, there's a credible argument to suggest Trump is aiding and abetting our enemies.

That's a problem. One in which voters should be aware of in an election year.

Isn't Rand Paul a doctor?

So he's saying people shouldn't presume he knows what he's talking about?

WTF?

JFC.

FML.

#7 | POSTED BY DOCNJO

This fool thinks it's justified to commit a [...] against a group of people that tore down a gate.

Take a ---- and get some perspective.

So, IOW, we need to be testing far more to identify those who could potentially be super spreaders.

Yet Bone Head in Chief doesn't want more testing, he wants less. That means a higher chance that super spreaders will spread the virus further. Couple that with his indifference relating to wearing masks, Trump is leading us in the complete wrong direction.

I'd say this would be decent news to consider had someone else been at the helm. This little silver lining doesn't mean anything when our leadership is walking us off the cliff.

#9 | POSTED BY TKNEES

The assumption is safely becoming a presumption.

Recent reports reveal captured Taliban fighters talking about bounties from the Russians.

There's so much smoke, it's difficult to see the flames. The idea that there is no fire has become a self-soothing mantra for Trumpers.