Come on, cultists! There's got to be more of you who will neutralize child sex abuse, yes? YES?!

#12

Great parallels. Thank you for posting.

Now swallow it.

Epstein files are released. At least some of it
#140 | Posted by eberly

How would you quantify "some of it"?

You mean 17,000 errors.
#25 | Posted by eberly

Error in aggregate, but you knew that, right? HAHAHA!

My question is, according to some things I have seen, the victim that was redacted was the one who killed herself. She is on record as saying Trump did nothing to her.
Is there anything there? And why are we going to just automatically take Epstein's word for anything. He was conspiring with Wolf to blackmail Trump.
It really shows what type of man Epstein was and makes you wonder why anyone would even deal with him in the first place.
#12 | Posted by boaz

She was only in Epstein's orbit for 2 years.
We need to see what the files contain regarding the then 13-year-old who said Trump violently raped her at Epstein's NYC apartment. And other trafficked girls and women ...
#166 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

The cult members, like BOAZ, are fascinatingly short sighted and small minded.

Why would Republican congress block Prince Andrew's testimony? Why are Trump and Republicans running cover for pedos? Is it only because they're just copying the Democrats (under Biden)? So the Republicans ARE ALSO pedo protectors just like the Dems? Kash Patel lied to Congress when he testified that only Epstein abused children?

Inquiring minds would like to know.

"The Biden-era sanctuary state policies in California foisted on the state and Americans by Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom have once again collided with federal law " this time on America's highways."

The statement exaggerates the novelty and political attribution of the crisis; the CDL compliance failures are long-standing and multifaceted federal-state regulatory issues, with enforcement actions occurring during Newsom's governorship but rooted in deeper systemic causes.

Systemic issues related to the improper issuance of commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) in California predate Governor Newsom's tenure and have been an ongoing challenge for years. Federal investigations and prosecutions have previously uncovered cases of DMV employees accepting bribes, identity fraud, and widespread failures to verify lawful presence or work authorization for CDL holders in the state. There have been several incidents and audits revealing California's troubles with licensing, including improper verification protocols, record-keeping failures, and compliance gaps that resulted in thousands of ineligible individuals receiving CDLs.[1][4][6]

Similar problems with license issuance have resulted in criminal prosecutions, regulatory crackdowns, and calls for reform and oversight well before the current scandal or Newsom's administration. These ongoing challenges highlight that California's CDL licensing controversies are part of a broader and persistent problem, not simply a recent development.[4][6][1]

The original information about the removal of the memorial to Black U.S. soldiers who died in WWII comes from reputable sources, including Newsweek, and has been confirmed as accurate reporting.

Key Findings
- Newsweek reported that panels commemorating African American soldiers were quietly removed from the visitor center at the Netherlands American Cemetery in Margraten.[1][3]
- These panels specifically highlighted the contributions of Black soldiers and the history of racial segregation in the U.S. military.[3]
- The panels had only recently been installed before their removal, raising criticism and questions from Dutch officials, historians, and family members of the commemorated soldiers.[6]
- No detailed explanation was given by the ABMC or U.S. officials about the removal, though some news outlets referenced vague statements about internal policy review.[3][6]
- Multiple outlets confirm that the removed panels were those specifically focusing on Black servicemembers, rather than a wider rotation of content.[2][6][3]

Conclusion
The removal event is factual, and the details were first widely covered by Newsweek. However, the rationale for the removal"including whether it was part of a regular rotation or a specific reversal of commemorative policy"remains unclear and disputed in reporting. The lack of transparent explanation has led to further criticism from officials and historians.[2][6][3]

ICE should have hit the 79 year old with a sandwich.
#36 | Posted by visitor_

You're right! No harm done with a sandwich. Far better than concrete, eh?

If one of us walked out of work every day and someone was there to throw a sandwich at us, I think we'd want something done about it.
#9 | Posted by kwrx25

You could duck! HAHAHA!!!

Republicans own the shutdown now. Those purists can get bent.

I've never understood the latino community's attraction to Trump. It makes no sense to me.
#9 | Posted by eberly

Ever heard of "machismo"?

Oh, I see! Democrats are refusing to open the government because they're demanding healthcare for "illegal aliens"? Right. And I suppose gravity's just a communist plot to keep patriots from floating away.

The reality's boring, but here it is: Dems want to extend ACA subsidies so millions of American citizens don't get slammed with higher premiums. Republicans could agree today, reopen the government tomorrow, and move on.

But instead, they spin a cartoon narrative about Democrats holding the country hostage for illegal aliens' doctor visits. It's a lie with good marketing and apparently some folks can't tell the difference between a fact sheet and a Facebook meme.

Swallow it.

DEFINITELY a dem shutdown!
#2 | Posted by MSgt

They are sooooo weak, yet simultaneously soooooo strong!!!

GAAAAAAH! You cultists can't handle the cognitive dissonance!!! HAHAHAHA!

Lairmore had testified that the sandwich "exploded all over" his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. But a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Lairmore in his bulletproof vest.
#6 | Posted by qcp

So perjury. HAHA!

#10 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

Look at this fnkcin' guy! HAHAHA! Zero shame.

Prop 187
Prop 8
#9 | Posted by phinphan

Yeah, lawsuits are filed constantly. But actual overturns, as pointed out by Fresno? Once every couple of decades if the thing's blatantly unconstitutional. Prop 187 and Prop 8 are famous precisely because they're exceptions, not the rule.

Jeff Bezos paid 2.7 billion in Federal income taxes in 2024 so enough of "billionaires don't pay taxes".
#75 | Posted by fishpaw

JFC, aren't you the fnkcin' sucker, you silly cultist!

The claim that Jeff Bezos paid $2.7 billion in federal income taxes in 2024 is supported by multiple reputable sources, including Forbes and analysis cited by inequality and tax policy watchdogs. However, this amount was primarily due to the sale of $13.6 billion in Amazon stock, which is taxed as long-term capital gains"not as regular wage income. This means Bezos paid taxes when he realized gains by selling stock, not on his total increase in wealth that year.[1][2]

Details on Bezos's 2024 Tax Payment

- Forbes estimated that Bezos paid about $2.7 billion in federal tax for 2024, directly tied to his substantial stock sales.[2][1]
- The vast majority of this tax payment comes from realized capital gains, which are taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income.
- According to Forbes, this $2.7 billion in tax represented only about 4.5% of the increase in his wealth in 2024, as his net worth rose by about $60 billion that year.[2]
- Bezos also reduced his taxable gains through substantial charitable donations of Amazon shares, which resulted in tax deductions and further lowered his overall liability.[2]

Context: Billionaires and Taxes

- Many billionaires, including Bezos, often pay relatively low effective tax rates compared to their net worth or wealth increases, because unrealized gains on assets (such as stock that hasn't been sold) are not taxed under current law.[3][1]
- The $2.7 billion figure does not represent a typical year; it is unusually high due to the record amount of stock Bezos sold in 2024.[2]
- Prior reporting has documented that in some years, Bezos and other billionaires paid no federal income taxes at all.[4]

Conclusion

The statement is factually accurate regarding the $2.7 billion tax payment, but it is misleading as an argument that "billionaires pay their fair share" in the broader sense. The payment was a one-time result of a massive stock sale rather than a pattern of regular, wage-like taxation, and the effective rate remains far lower relative to wealth accumulation than what most middle-class workers pay.[3][1][2]

#5 | Posted by phinphan

Is that why you didn't provide even one example?

Fear? It doesn't affect me at all.
#21 | Posted by BellRinger

Not yet!

Mmmmmwaaaaaahahahahahha! (My best Mamdani evil laugh).

That makes no sense.
#18 | Posted by BellRinger

Tell me you're extremely short-sighted without telling me you're extremely short-sighted.

Tanks.

It will be very interesting to watch how conditions in NYC change as a result of this election
#15 | Posted by BellRinger

^^See people?! This is the fear. They fear that Mamdani's policies will positively impact New Yorkers, spreading the popularity of those policies beyond New York City.

This is what JEFF and his ilk fear.

Shows how many are then ignorant due to the liberal dem major/legacy media, as the Republicans have brought up the vote 13 times and it is the dems/dims who have failed to vote to reopen the government.
#16 | Posted by MSgt

JFC you cultists are such suckers! HAHAHA!!!