Would try it if I could get ahold of the product.
thehustle.co
#26 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Always seems to be THE issue with us old fogies.

Having a friend in another state to purchase the spores might be the safest way for Californians.
#23 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Yup. Or bring them back on the plane during a trip out of state. Transporting stuff like cannabis on the plane seems easy peasy these days. TSA more concerned with massive amounts of meth and coke and heroin, etc. Not so much pot and doubt they would know what to look for with mushroom spores. Many assumptions on my part, but glad to know you imbibe. Ever consider the micro-dosing route? I'm not sure I could handle a "full dose" any more. Micro-dosing sounds intriguing.

More to the threads topic, I'm really glad I never tried jumping on the adderall or ambien train (at one time considered both). I've read folks successfully using micro-dosing of LSD to kick those habits.

#18 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

If I remember correctly, my buddy ordered his from Minnesota or Michigan. But that was back in 2002 or 2003.

So I'm sure your right about the current situation, but there's always the Silk Road (or what ever replacement that has been established). Georgia and Idaho were the other two states you mentioned.

plentiful in the area because of the PTSD study going on at UCSD.
#12 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Interesting. I know people at UCSD (in a professional sense), but that's not exactly a conversation for me to have with them. Now thinking about it, my lack of ties to the black market truly exemplify how old I am getting.

So happy cannabis is now legal. What a pain it was to find someone, anyone with some decent non-Mexi cannabis. My neighbor has a decent sized outdoor operation going on. The plants are more than 8 feet tall, growing far above our fence line. So it constantly smells like pot around my house. But looks like all the plants are males. Her results are PACKED with seeds. Took me back to my high school days; the tediousness of picking out seeds and worrying about smoking one leading to lower sperm count.

Meh, just go down the street to local pot shop. $40 for some really good pot, seedless. I never thought we'd get to this stage of progress when I was in college.

Actually it is in California and two other states.
#14 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Well, he pulled it off in San Diego. Unless you have a direct connect to black market, this probably the easiest way to get a hold of some. Plus, California is considering altering the laws surrounding psilocybin, so there may be hope to make it even easier.

The drugs are cheap.
The shaman is the expensive part.
#11 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

#2 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

You can grow your own. The mushrooms themselves are illegal to possess, but the spores to grow them are not. Nor is it illegal to buy, so you can purchase over the internet. I believe it only takes a couple months to grow (low light, damp conditions). My buddy pulled it off and the outcome was pleasant.

The quest is to determine how those effects can be beneficial and what the dose should be.
#4 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

Exactly. Microdosing is a fascinating aspect being looked at by some groups. One of which found a synthetic form of psilocybin that is being touted as a cure for all addictions. I know there are some drastic and dangerous exotic plant extracts that have been used (anecdotally) to help treat heroin addiction (one experience with this stuff and addicts claim addictions to be cured; crazy 12 hour experience they have to endure, though). So the theory has been shown to be possible in an anecdotal sense. Now it's time for some companies to profit off the theory. Really just comes down to the FDA processing the new drug through. Considering the DEA still lists psilocybin and cannabis as Schedule I drugs (i.e., illicit substances with no purported medical benefits), the drug in question still has a long way to go. But just imagine being able to microdose yourself with magic mushrooms away from alcoholism or tobacco use. It could very well be a major game changer, especially for those who are self medicating.

(3) the currently pending Articles of Impeachment against Trump have no relationship to the Page surveillance or the Mueller investigation.
#25 | POSTED BY JOE

This does seem to be conflated by many, recently.

#3

My ---- is miraculous in its depths.

LOL. Sorry, but I am going to call you a 100% LIAR. If you say that you personally didn't think the economy would collapse under Trump, I will take you at your word - but if you say that you "never seen anyone say that the economy would crash just because Trump was elected" - well, then you are a ---- LIAR.
#45 | POSTED BY IRAGOLDBERG

I'll counter by calling you a fccking liar.

Fair?

The balls on this guy!

I mean these Dems...

...

(1) condemns United States Attorney General William P. Barr for his despicable comments and actions;

(2) calls on United States Attorney General William P. Barr to resign;

(3) calls on the Virginia State Bar to remove United States Attorney General William P. Barr from its rolls;

(4) calls on the New York State Bar Association to remove United States Attorney General William P. Barr from its rolls;

(5) calls on the District of Columbia Bar to remove United States Attorney General William P. Barr from its rolls;

(6) reaffirms support for the diversity of the United States; and

(7) reaffirms, in the strongest terms, its support for and commitment to the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Women make terrible disgruntled employees...
#24 | POSTED BY PEGASUS

You used a ridiculous example in your misogynistic attempt at smearing women considering Hillary was never hired, hence she was never fired nor could she be accuratately described as a disgruntled employee. All you did was describe the actions of a disgruntled female political candidate, which is apples to bathtubs as a comparison.

[Nov 3. 2016]

"The FBI is Trumpland," said one current agent.

This atmosphere raises major questions about how Comey and the bureau he is slated to run for the next seven years can work with Clinton should she win the White House.

The currently serving FBI agent said Clinton is "the antichrist personified to a large swath of FBI personnel," and that "the reason why they're leaking is they're pro-Trump."

#425 I'm not responding to troll posts.
#427 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Aaaaawwww fcck!

Now my irony meter is spiking!

Down boy, down!

Based upon what I've seen in this report and following testimony it is my belief that this entire investigation was predicated on political bias and I take into account how Comey instigated the Mueller investigation and how these same actors handled the Clinton email criminal investigation. I freely admit that I don't have official proof of that although given Durham's brief statement on Monday I'm pretty sure he has proof and will be producing it once he concludes his investigation.
#409 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

The entire investigation? Your absolutism is what I question and why I added in the notion that you prop yourself up as being more objective than anyone here.

And no, I don't get angry at anonymous posters on the internet, ESPECIALLY here on the DR. You didn't even offer an accusation of trolling against me; instead went straight to "he's aaaaaaaaaaaaaaangry!" Maybe your trolling against others actually is a front, a measly attempt at masking your sincerity. Maybe not.

BOAZ's willful ignorance is frustrating, but that hardly rises to the level of anger.

Beach [is] getting really angry with me personally for pointing all of this out.
#396 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

You have no clue what you're talking about.

Either you're trolling or you are a hypocrite that can't handle being trolled.

Buck up, buttercup.

Trump 2020! : )
#11 | POSTED BY MSGT

Not that you would pay attention, but I've been saying since 2017 that Trump will be reelected, especially if the Dems put forth the "next in line" candidate in Biden. The Dems have taken a major risk in taking on impeachment, but that, in my mind, is a good thing. Regardless of the potential losses Dems face in 2020, they're headed in the right direction in impeaching Trump.

Unlike the Republicans, Dems have outed themselves as country over party.

My original point stands.

IMO, by following the weaker claims the Dems are letting the GOP Senators off the hook.
#386 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER

Is that an indication that you'd prefer nothing to come of this?

#384 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER

Goes the other way just as easily.

Collusion? Mueller didn't find any in spite of having a team of rabid hard-core Democrats who had vast resources to find it and spent nearly two years trying to do so.
#4 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Now do obstruction.

#9 | POSTED BY MSGT

No pee tape didn't undermine the ENTIRE conglomeration of reports. Got it?