It's not the Israelis who refuse peace. It's the Palestinians,

Ummm, pretty clearly it's both who refuse peace. But you have your agenda, so please continue your screed.

Sounds like she overcame multiple obstacles to achieve a goal by using tools afforded to everyone else. And this is supposed to be a bad thing? LOL You MAGA cultists are a strange bunch.

So they're going to punish him for being undocumented without punishing him for human smuggling?

You MAGA cultists think being undocumented is worse than human smuggling? HAHAHA! JFC, you people are a bunch of simps!

Trump must have raped a whole bunch of kids to warrant this level of distraction.

So instead of suing the blacks and asians for creating blacks-only and asian-only communities illegally, which obviously makes them outright racists, these whites are going to follow suit and illegally build racist whites-only commnunities?

Ummmm, okay. Then the resident MAGA cultists can fall into the exact logic they're throwing out on this thread and be consistent by calling these whites racists and the community they're trying to build illegal. Right, cultists?

You won't want to go there.
#22 | Posted by easy_meat

You keep saying that on multiple threads. You don't seem to know what that phrase means. Please, prove me wrong.

He wants everyone (but the select few) to have worse, low energy consumption third world lives.
#76 | Posted by visitor_

Then throw some solar panels up on your roof and STFU about it, cultist!

#28 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

It wasn't Newsom. Heck, Newsom wasn't even the Governor of California in 2018. Not that idiot Noem would know that tid bit of nuance. But hey, she's stuck in the cult too, just like all the other DR resident cultists who are incapable of following a basic timeline.

Obama gave Putin all the signals he needed to take Crimea, he knew Obama and the US weren't up for it.
#54 | Posted by oneironaut

This was B. Hussein's war, then it was Trump's, then it was Biden's, now it's Trump's again.

Time for you to sack up and offer some input about your cult's leader, cultist!

And BOAZ runs away. What a fnkcin' cultist clown.

#48 | Posted by fishpaw

^^Cultists like FISHPAW LOVE armchair quarterbacking. It's their fav!

#27 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

Only car owners can vote, according to Trump.

The guy is a fnkcin' buffoon.

Fake charges?! Hahaha! JFC, BOAZ.

You are really deep in that cult.

Speaks volumes Trump hired lawyers who couldn't help him beat "fake charges."

Fake charges...Fake news. You fnckin' cultists are absolutely delusional.

#82 | Posted by BellRinger

And ignoring #71. I can see why.

To follow the process you are advocating it would take dozens of years to remove the people that Biden brought in over 4 years.
#69 | Posted by BellRinger

Perfect example proving you are not a serious person.

Due process in the context of deportation refers to the legal rights and procedures the U.S. government must follow before removing (deporting) a person from the country. This principle is enshrined in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and applies to all "persons," not just citizens.

At its core, due process requires that before an individual is deprived of life, liberty, or property, including the right to remain in the U.S., they must be given:

- Notice of the proceedings and the reasons for possible deportation: The person must be informed of the government's intentions and the legal basis for deportation.
- A fair hearing before an impartial judge: Non-citizens generally have the right to appear before an immigration judge to contest their removal, present evidence, and challenge the government's case.
- The opportunity to examine and challenge evidence: Individuals can see the evidence against them and present their own evidence or witnesses.
- A chance to appeal decisions: Adverse decisions can often be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and sometimes to federal courts.[1][2][5]

Important limitations and exceptions:
- People in immigration proceedings do not have a constitutional right to a government-provided attorney, which means many must represent themselves if they cannot afford legal counsel.
- There are expedited removal procedures where some people can be deported quickly without a full hearing, especially for those apprehended near the border or shortly after entering the country. In these cases, seeking asylum or demonstrating a "credible fear" can trigger fuller due process protections.[2]
- Due process has been subject to policy changes and legal challenges"certain executive actions and court decisions can affect the scope and strength of these protections.[4][5]

Due process is a fundamental safeguard to ensure fair treatment and prevent arbitrary or wrongful deportation. It remains a critical issue in immigration law, with ongoing debates and legal battles about its exact scope and implementation.[3][5][1][4]

#39

You're not a serious person.

#62 | Posted by easy_meat

Already did! You're just showing off your willful ignorance, cultist!

She just needs to start a right-wing podcast. She'll be fine.

It's a little more complicated than some cultists would like to acknowledge.

Wow! More people fnkcing up because they are unaware that ChatGPT produces hallucinations?

BREAKING NEWS!

#44 | Posted by easy_meat

Violent crime rates are influenced by many complex factors: poverty, local policing, drug epidemics, education, historic trends, and economic conditions. Political leadership (Democrat or Republican) and "sanctuary" status are only two of many variables, and crime statistics do not show a consistent, direct relationship with either. The largest U.S. cities (regardless of crime level) tend to be run by Democrats simply because Democrats generally dominate urban areas. There are Democrat-led cities with both high and low crime rates, and the same is true for Republican-led cities.

So blaming high crime solely on Democratic governance, or linking it directly to sanctuary status, is an oversimplification unsupported by the broader data, which you obviously ignore, cultist!

The comparison was meant to show that "sanctuary city" status alone doesn't make a city more or less dangerous. Memphis, a non-sanctuary city, has the highest violent crime rate in the nation, whereas big sanctuary cities like San Francisco, Seattle, and New York actually have much lower rates, even below the national average in some years. Crime rates are shaped by a wide variety of social and economic factors, not just immigration policies or political leadership, and the data simply doesn't support your cultist suggestion that sanctuary or Democrat-led cities are inherently more dangerous.

Swallow it.