Tuesday, February 03, 2026

The Law of Unintended Consequences, Firearms Edition

Donald Trump's view of the Second Amendment is pretty simple. People who support him should have all the guns they want, in any place they want to have them. The bigger the guns, the more bullets they fire per trigger-pull, the more damage they do when hitting a target, the better. By contrast, people who oppose him should have no guns at all. And if some Second Amendment spoilsport does sell a gun to a non-Trumper, then that non-Trumper should leave that gun under lock and key at all times, and should never even touch it, much less carry it while out in public.

Comments

snip ...

The problem for Trump, of course, is that the Second Amendment doesn't lay things out in quite that way. Reasonable people can disagree about the meaning of "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...," but whatever the interpretation of that clause is, it applies to everyone equally. And since Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly from the current SCOTUS, has made clear that "A well regulated Militia" means "pretty much everyone," then the current state of play is that nearly any adult in the U.S. who wants a gun, and follows the local laws, can have one.

In their desperate attempts to make Alex Pretti responsible for his own homicide (see above), Trump and MAGA have tried to push a line along the lines of "if you're carrying a gun in the presence of police, you're asking for it." The NRA and other gun groups, to their credit, instantly pushed back against this. These groups may be rather fanatical, and most of them may be thinly veiled fronts for the gun industry, but at least they are not hypocrites. And the fact that MAGA and the NRA are on different sides here has given us one of the more interesting and unexpected squabbles in recent political history.

And if that's not weird and unexpected enough, Second Amendment advocates find themselves with a new source of reinforcements these days: liberals. There have always been left-leaning gun groups, groups that exist to serve folks who want guns for the most common reasons (hunting, self-defense, etc.) and who happen to be politically liberal, or groups that exist to help make sure that vulnerable people (e.g., LGBTQ+) are armed as an insurance policy. At the moment, and in response to the violence in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Portland, Chicago and other cities, left-leaning gun groups like L.A. Progressive Shooters (left-wing Angelenos), Pink Pistols Twin Cities (gay Minnesotans), Grassroots Defense (liberal Iowans), the National African American Gun Association (Black people) and the John Brown Gun Club (anti-fascists/anti-racists) are seeing a massive surge in interest.

#1 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-03 03:24 PM

snip ...

The linked article contains interviews with the leaders of some of these groups, who offer all-purpose explanations for what's going on. For example, the fellow who created the National African American Gun Association says, "People join when certain people get in office, because it scares them. People join when they see these shootings across the country, and it seems like it's just madness starting to grow more and more."

That may be partly on target, but it goes beyond that, we think. First of all, it's been well established in the scientific literature that conservatives tend to be more fearful than liberals. So, "gun sales surge in response to the election of Barack Obama"? OK, that tracks. But "gun sales surge in response to the election of Donald Trump"? It works less well and, in fact, it didn't happen. The visible increase in left-wing gun ownership, and left-wing interest in gun ownership, did not come with the first or second swearings-in of Trump (or, for that matter, after the first or second swearings-in of George W. Bush). It came after ICE was deployed as the President's personal stormtroopers.

#2 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-02-03 03:27 PM

Donald Trump does not support the Bill of Rights.

That includes the 2nd Amendment

You want to keep your guns, MAGA, you'll have to stand up to Donald Trump.

Maybe your ownership of guns will make you brave, as you've often told us.

But frankly I think you're just so many cowards.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-03 06:40 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

NYT Uncovers 5,300+ Epstein Files Mentioning Trump (96 comments)

Marjorie Taylor Greene Says MAGA Is a 'Big Lie' (31 comments)

ICE Officers Ordered to Wear Body Cameras in Minneapolis (24 comments)

Trump: 'nationalize' Voting (23 comments)

Two CBP Agents Identified in Alex Pretti Shooting (22 comments)

Todd Blanche says Review of Jeffrey Epstein Sex-Trafficking Case 'is over' (22 comments)

UK PM: Ex-Prince Andrew Should Testify to US Congress (17 comments)

Kennedy Center Will Close in July for Renovation (16 comments)

Citizen Forcibly Pulled from Car After Not Showing her 'papers' Fast Enough (16 comments)

Pirro: Jail Time for Gun Owners who Travel to D.C. with Guns (15 comments)