Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

Augustine

Subscribe to Augustine's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Sunday, November 03, 2024

The GOP candidate's campaign didn't seek approval from Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley to use his image in the ad, a defense official said. "This photo, like many others, was not used with [Milley's] knowledge or consent," said the official, who requested anonymity to speak about a sensitive topic. The military has strict rules against uniformed service members participating in political campaigns, and the ad is just the latest example of the president or those around him pulling the nation's highest-ranking officer and other Defense Department officials into the political realm. read more


Friday, October 25, 2024

The independent Black Sea nation of Georgia, once a satellite USSR, republic is weighing its future between not alienating Russia, its aggressive northern neighbor that invaded in 2008 to occupy the provinces of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, or electing a new government that aims to have Georgia becoming a EU member by 2030. The most persuasive argument for staying with a pro-Russian government seems to be to avoid another armed invasion by Putin's military.


Comments

Putin's hurting, but he's banked on Trump to rescue him from the quagmire caused by his ill-advised and costly aggression vs Ukraine. Why would Trump save Putin vs Ukraine? Trump's not a brilliant American patriot. He's a calculating transaction-focused gamer. He thinks alliances are great as long as he sees the clear-short term benefit (primarily to him). For Saudi Arabia, it's because the Prince invested $2 billion in Jared's LBO firm. For Russia, its because Putin's bank has lent Trump Inc. hundreds of millions that is still on the books. And because Trump hates Zelensky because Zelensky did not throw Biden's son under the bus and because Trump got impeached as a result of a "perfect" conversation with Zelensky.

So, here's another question. Why is Trump choosing not just ill-prepared & incompetent cabinet nominees, but largely odd-ball characters who will be toxic to the government agencies they have been nominated to control and who, as a whole, will wreck those agencies of national policy and protection and America's National Security Council, which weighs in on any and all situations affecting America's safety and international security? It doesn't take a PhD to recognize a sinister and dangerous pattern.

Putin's been spending $ and FSB efforts to destabilize democracies & NATO. Putin's regime has helped "populist" autocratic movements thrive in Hungary & Slovakia and increasingly contributes to help increasingly stronger autocratic-leaning "populist" movements in Germany, France, and Netherlands. (And America?) Why? Go ahead, think about it.

Before Trump's official nominees come up for confirmation, next year's GOP US Senate's members need to dig deeper into why would their consenting to the creation of an Executive Branch Cabinet (and especially the next National Security Council) nearly fully created to help America's enemy Putin and to create chaos across America's institutions and our alliances with liberal democracies in NATO and around the world be in America's best interest? Is it in America's best interest, or would those senators rather sell out what moral courage they have and the nation just to avoid Trump's ire?

Where is the national interest in the Cabinet & National Security Council that Trump is building? His ingredients are a suicidal recipe for our national security and for America's Constitution.

If Congress gives its consent to Trump's Cabinet picks "recipe", it will create chaos throughout our national intelligence and national defense establishments.

Just ask any former SECDEF or FBI or counter intel agency leader about their feelings about Trump's proposed Cabinet's intent. They'll agree, the creation as a whole will be more destructive than the sum of its parts. Beware.

It seems that Trump's going to use his next administration to rescue Putin's butt from the quagmire of Putin's stupid aggression vs Ukraine. (Doubt that? See this; www.youtube.com)

Why would Trump save Putin vs Ukraine? Trump's not a brilliant American patriot. He's a calculating transaction-focused gamer. He thinks alliances are great as long as he sees the clear-short term benefit (primarily to him). For Saudi Arabia, it's because the Prince invested $2 billion in Jared's LBO firm. For Russia, its because Putin's bank has lent Trump Inc. hundreds of millions that is still on the books. And because Trump hates Zelensky because Zelensky did not throw Biden's son under the bus and because Trump got impeached as a result of a "perfect" conversation with Zelensky.

So, here's another question. Why is Trump choosing not just unprepared cabinet leaders, but leaders who will be toxic to the government agencies and who as a whole will wreck those agencies and America's National Security Council?

Putin's been spending $ and FSB efforts to destabilize democracies & NATO. Putin's regime has helped "populist" autocratic movements thrive in Hungary & Slovakia and increasingly contributes to help increasingly stronger autocratic-leaning "populist" movements in Germany, France, and Netherlands. (And America?) Why? Go figure

The US Senate's GOP members need to dig deeper into why would their consenting to the creation of an Executive Branch Cabinet (and especially the next National Security Council) nearly fully created to help America's enemy Putin and to create chaos across America's institutions and our alliances with liberal democracies in NATO and around the world be in America's best interest? Is it in America's best interest, or would those senators rather sell out what moral courage they have and the nation just to avoid Trump's ire?

Where is the national interest in the Cabinet & National Security Council that Trump is building? His ingredients are a suicidal recipe for our national security and for Anerica's Constitution.

If Congress gives its consent to Trump's Cabinet picks "recipe", it will create chaos throughout our national intelligence and national defense establishments.

Just ask any former SECDEF or FBI or counter intel agency leader about their feelings about Trump's proposed Cabinet's intent. They'll agree, the creation as a whole will be more destructive than the sum of its parts. Beware.

If dictator, fascist loving Trump becomes President ever again, what's to prevent him from allying with Russia? A lot. The democratically aligned NATO nations would protest. But, what would prevent Trump from slow l-walking a move toward a break from our current national security allies? Not much.

If Trump were to become POTUS and to have mostly the kind of Congress he wants, he could effectively dismantle America's National Security structure from top to bottom.

He'd likely start with stopping all funds and support for Ukraine. Then, he could call for other countries to do the same.

Further, to help Putin undermine Western democracies, he could ally with the Russia-leaning leaders of Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia, and Austria, and attempt to rally support for Putin-friendly opposition candidates in Poland, Germany and France. He could also take security clearances away from former national security leaders and military officers who disagree with him and stack the Pentagon with fascist & Russia friendly officers and career civilians.

He could also close important bases and decommission important military units and continue to "accidentally" (on purpose) disclose sources and methods of US & allied intelligence. What happened when he did that his first time in office? Nothing. He also kicked out everyone, including his translator, to have a private 20 minute conversation in private with Putin. (It's doubtful Trump can speak any foreign language except maybe German, but Putin is fluent in several languages, including English and including the language of manioulation, especially in manipulating self-serving, low IQ narcissists.) Clearly, under Trump,
national security secrets are at risk.

If Trump fills government and military with his acolytes if he becomes POTUS, the damage he could do to our allies' and our own national security could be immense and possibly permanent.

I posted this on a blog about the debate:

Vance just lied and distorted the whole way through and made many slightly-less outrageous claims of what a Trump + Vance administration would do. But fancy promises are the legacy of slick snake oil salesmen like Trump and Vance.

The most annoying Vance tactic, however, was Vance's referring to the last 3 1/2 years of Biden's presidency as the "Harris Administration" when questioning why Harris's campaign pledges hadn't yet been implemented.

What stupid questions those were!

But without Walz stopping Vance cold when he was using the tactic, a great turning point in the debate was missed.

Walz should have stopped that cold by patronizingly asking why it seemed that Vance doesn't understand the difference between the jobs of the President and the Vice President. And, would Vance claim that the accomplishments of the 4-year long "Pence Administration" out-shined Trump's administration? Walz could have closed that schooling moment by asking Vance a simple pair of questions:

"So, if by odd chance you become Mr. Trump's VP, how would he feel if you were to refer to your position as the head of the Vance Administration'? And just how much authority do you expect Mr. Trump would ever give to a VP of his?"

We all know the real answer to that 2nd question: "Only the authority to agree and to adulate Herr Trump."

Wishing that Walz's debate coach had inspired him to improv some memorable zingers and to be eager to use every juicy opportunity to plop a good zinger in Vance's lap every time Vance got too smarmy for his britches.

Vance just lied and distorted the whole way through and made many slightly-less outrageous claims of what a Trump + Vance administration would do. But fancy promises are the legacy of slick snake oil salesmen like Trump and Vance. The most annoying Vance tactic was Vance's referring to the last 3 1/2 years of Biden's presidency as "the Harris Administration" when questioning why Harris's campaign pledges hadn't already been implemented yet!

What stupid questions those were! But without Walz stopping Vance cold when he continued using the tactic a great turning point in the debate was mussed.

Walz should have stopped that tactic cold by patronizingly asking why it seemed that Vance doesn't understand the difference between the jobs of the President and the Vice President. Would Vance claim that the accomplishments of the "Pence Administration" out-shined Trump's?? And Walz should have closed that comment by asking Vance a simple pair of questions:

"So, if by odd chance you were to become Mr. Trump's VP how would he feel if you were to refer to your position as the head of the Vance Administration'? And just how much authority do you expect Trump would ever give to a VP of his?"

We all know the answer to that l question: Only the authority to agree and to adulate Herr Trump.

Wishing Walz's debate coach had inspired Walz to improv some memorable zingers, and to be eager to exploit every juicy opportunity to plop a good zinger in Vance's lap every time Vance got too smarmy for his britches.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable