Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

Augustine

Subscribe to Augustine's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Comments

If dictator, fascist loving Trump becomes President ever again, what's to prevent him from allying with Russia? A lot. The democratically aligned NATO nations would protest. But, what would prevent Trump from slow l-walking a move toward a break from our current national security allies? Not much.

If Trump were to become POTUS and to have mostly the kind of Congress he wants, he could effectively dismantle America's National Security structure from top to bottom.

He'd likely start with stopping all funds and support for Ukraine. Then, he could call for other countries to do the same.

Further, to help Putin undermine Western democracies, he could ally with the Russia-leaning leaders of Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia, and Austria, and attempt to rally support for Putin-friendly opposition candidates in Poland, Germany and France. He could also take security clearances away from former national security leaders and military officers who disagree with him and stack the Pentagon with fascist & Russia friendly officers and career civilians.

He could also close important bases and decommission important military units and continue to "accidentally" (on purpose) disclose sources and methods of US & allied intelligence. What happened when he did that his first time in office? Nothing. He also kicked out everyone, including his translator, to have a private 20 minute conversation in private with Putin. (It's doubtful Trump can speak any foreign language except maybe German, but Putin is fluent in several languages, including English and including the language of manioulation, especially in manipulating self-serving, low IQ narcissists.) Clearly, under Trump,
national security secrets are at risk.

If Trump fills government and military with his acolytes if he becomes POTUS, the damage he could do to our allies' and our own national security could be immense and possibly permanent.

I posted this on a blog about the debate:

Vance just lied and distorted the whole way through and made many slightly-less outrageous claims of what a Trump + Vance administration would do. But fancy promises are the legacy of slick snake oil salesmen like Trump and Vance.

The most annoying Vance tactic, however, was Vance's referring to the last 3 1/2 years of Biden's presidency as the "Harris Administration" when questioning why Harris's campaign pledges hadn't yet been implemented.

What stupid questions those were!

But without Walz stopping Vance cold when he was using the tactic, a great turning point in the debate was missed.

Walz should have stopped that cold by patronizingly asking why it seemed that Vance doesn't understand the difference between the jobs of the President and the Vice President. And, would Vance claim that the accomplishments of the 4-year long "Pence Administration" out-shined Trump's administration? Walz could have closed that schooling moment by asking Vance a simple pair of questions:

"So, if by odd chance you become Mr. Trump's VP, how would he feel if you were to refer to your position as the head of the Vance Administration'? And just how much authority do you expect Mr. Trump would ever give to a VP of his?"

We all know the real answer to that 2nd question: "Only the authority to agree and to adulate Herr Trump."

Wishing that Walz's debate coach had inspired him to improv some memorable zingers and to be eager to use every juicy opportunity to plop a good zinger in Vance's lap every time Vance got too smarmy for his britches.

Vance just lied and distorted the whole way through and made many slightly-less outrageous claims of what a Trump + Vance administration would do. But fancy promises are the legacy of slick snake oil salesmen like Trump and Vance. The most annoying Vance tactic was Vance's referring to the last 3 1/2 years of Biden's presidency as "the Harris Administration" when questioning why Harris's campaign pledges hadn't already been implemented yet!

What stupid questions those were! But without Walz stopping Vance cold when he continued using the tactic a great turning point in the debate was mussed.

Walz should have stopped that tactic cold by patronizingly asking why it seemed that Vance doesn't understand the difference between the jobs of the President and the Vice President. Would Vance claim that the accomplishments of the "Pence Administration" out-shined Trump's?? And Walz should have closed that comment by asking Vance a simple pair of questions:

"So, if by odd chance you were to become Mr. Trump's VP how would he feel if you were to refer to your position as the head of the Vance Administration'? And just how much authority do you expect Trump would ever give to a VP of his?"

We all know the answer to that l question: Only the authority to agree and to adulate Herr Trump.

Wishing Walz's debate coach had inspired Walz to improv some memorable zingers, and to be eager to exploit every juicy opportunity to plop a good zinger in Vance's lap every time Vance got too smarmy for his britches.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable