Whats,

"#87 | Posted by BillJohnson
How Christian of you."

It's sort of ridiculous what I posted. Right?

Anyone who believes I was serious should have their head examined.

That's what I think of anyone who actually believes Kilmeade was serious.

Truth,

"Hey bill, does it ever come as a surprise to you that people hold you in such contempt?"

If it makes you feel any better, sometimes I hold myself in contempt.

Then I go find a liberal psychologist who reassures me that guilt is just an outdated social construct and bills me $200 for the insight.

Truth,

Don't try to psychoanalyze me.

You ain't nearly smart enough.

Clown,

"He'd watch."

I'd film it and set up a website and make people pay to see them.

The creeps around the world would gladly pay to watch this stuff.

I bet you'd pay or would you just get bootleg copies?

Truth,

A little research.

If the fed bought pentobarbital in bulk, it would cost about $7500 per person.

There are estimated 771,480 homeless. That times 7500 is about $5.7 billion.

That's a lot cheaper than 20 billion.

Bulk is the way to go.

Truth,

"some sources estimating a lower figure of around $20 billion for a one-time intervention to end it permanently."

It could be a lot cheaper than that.

Just ask Kilmeade.

Redial,

"You can judge Tom Hanks from one second of B-roll video?"

He did it twice in 2020.

Golden Globes and I believe SAG awards.

He gave his "oh me oh my" face...

Everyone else laughed but like Will Smith, he thinks he's special.

If he was in church and the pastor made a dirty joke, his facial expression might have been appropriate.

Overwise he came across as a rich snob.

That's my opinion.

Brass,

"I mean, I think the guy is a smart guy - so maybe he really does believe it?"

I think since he is on live TV, he has a different sort of responsibility to watch what he says.

I've said out loud I think single women with more than two children out of wedlock should be given a tubal ligation to receive government assistance.

Do I really mean it? You'll never know.

I can say that because I'm not on live TV.

Alex,

"Christ, you'll defend any right winger."

I'm not defending him.

But I am saying I really doubt he is suggesting they should be killed.

I would certainly hope so.

I don't know his inner most thoughts but apparently you do.

Bell,

I don't listen to Kilmeade or have any perception of his temperament.

He f***** up for sure.

I am a person who accepts apologies if I believe they are sincere.

Again...I don't know his history of comments on air to get a feel if this was an ongoing hateful attitude he has towards the homeless that finally culminated in his comment about killing them.

Yea...he has a problem.

However, anyone trying to say his comment is representative of Foxnews is throwing straw.

Alex,

"Then why did he apologize?"

Have you ever said anything in a moment of frustration you later had to say you're sorry?

And then you followed up with, "you know I didn't mean it".

Were you lying when you said that?

Or are you going to tell me you never apologize when you say something hurtful?

Bell,

"I have a very difficult time accepting his apology."

Given the climate we're in these days, Kilmeade might end up fired.

I certainly don't believe he meant it literally.

But...Fox may have no choice.

Clown,

"Yea stupid. 100%."

"Idiots like you would be perfectly fine with killing off homeless people."

You can call me idiot but don't accuse me of wanting to kill people.

You're suspended.

It will be quite some time before I have anything to say to you.

John,

You know good and well that one man's comment was similar to stuff we've all said in moments of frustration.

The problem was he was on live TV.

Also, to attribute one man's comment to the entire network is nonsense.

Use your common sense.

Do you really believe his comment was calling his listeners to start killing the homeless.

Eff,

If they're not mentally ill and just need to get clean, they likely won't agree to giving up their addiction because...well...they're addicted.

Then they can go free after getting some help.

You think of anything better that hasn't been tried?

John,

"I'll ask you directly, should we execute the chronically homeless in our country for no other reason than they exist?"

I reread my post.

Nope...at no point did I mention killing.

Corky,

I am referring to mail-in ballots omly and not other issues surrounding voting.

My opinion is non-partisan.

States having in person early voting greatly deals with any accusations of voter suppression.

There's always exceptions. In that case if they want to vote then the onus is on them to find a way around it.

No more posting about ballots and voting.

Like Laura, I want to give it a break.

Corky,

What's past is past.

I am talking about preserving the integrity of our voting system for the future.

The Jan 6 break-in would not have occurred were it not for mail-in ballots used extensively. People might have gathered still but it is my opinion they would not have broke in were it not for the doubt surrounding the election.

It was a believable scenario that the election had been corrupted regardless what anyone else said.

I believe it is evitable another election will have problems due to transporting large numbers of uncounted ballots.

When I was setting up accounting systems, sometimes it appeared to be overkill.

My idea was "don't plan for what you need today. Plan for what you'll need in the future."

Now it's time for Laura...

How about the 2 headed spirit people?

Oh...wrong thread.

Alex,

"Tell us more about your mail in ballot fraud theories..."

Liar liar pants on fire.

I have always been mostly concerned with the logistics of transporting uncounted ballots.

I prefer systems where you vote and your ballot is read via a scanner on the spot.

Of course there is fraud also going on. Anything involving humans there is always people who cheat the system.

Clown,

This site demonstrates what is wrong with social networks.

It's mostly people just preaching to the choir and reinforcing their most twisted illogical nonsense framing facts to meet a particular idea or belief.

Donner,

"Intolerance of the intolerant is not the same as rabid Trumpers intolerance of the Other."

Can you say that fast 10 times?

Donner,

"rabid base"

From what I've observed, Trump haters are pretty "rabid".

Donner,

You were talking about people being influenced and I said I agree but it's happening on both sides.

Personally, I was aware of him but hadn't listened to Kirk a great deal.

His death will attract more people to start playing his videos.

Kirk's death isn't just impacting the US.

People in other countries are memorializing him in incredible numbers.

Quite astounding the number of people who are recognizing Charlie Kirk.

And no...MAGA or Trump didn't brainwash them into it.

It's all about Charlie.

Donner,

"It's the young people who are easily influenced by "influencers" like Tyler Robison obviously was."

I agree with that.

While I'm not against video games, there is a point where obsessive playing violent games isn't healthy or perhaps is a symptom of a bigger problem. This shooter was reportedly heavily into gaming.

And social networks are becoming too influential. Things like short video formats like Tiktoc zero in on what your tastes are and purposely feeds and reinforces them, whether or not they are healthy.

Are you yourself so "programmed" you can't see its a non-partisan problem?