What does Pres Trump have against improving the transportation infrastructure of the United States?

He's not personally benefiting.

We needs more Trans news stories to distract Republicans.

There's something about Pam Bondi that screams "Child Sexual Abuse Victim".

I wouldn't be surprised to find out she was one of the Epstein girls he gifted to Trump.

I don't care anyway.
#75 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Your post count on this thread indicates otherwise.

I agree with you.
#76 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Of course you do.

You never actually argued about anything I posted.

You simply assigned me a strawman and proceeded to argue.

Clown can make it about who they voted for.
#68 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Have you figured out who the Canadian Trans shooter voted for?

Face it. You're crying because I stated the majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists in America are rightwing morons.

Your fight isn't with me, it's with reality.

Bozo.

but that doesn't stop you from making it about the political affiliation of the shooter.

On this thread. You're the only one talking about political affiliation of the Canadian Trans shooter.

Just you.

You seem very concerned about it.

Have you figured out which party they were affiliated with?

And I am right.
#58 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Yea.

You and Eberly are always right.

It's easy when you simply ignore reality.

there is no point in arguing with you

Especially when you show up unarmed.

Face it, you got trolled by Boaz.

You make it political when you make it political.

#10 really cut you deep.

The truth hurts. Clearly it's scarred you.

I wasn't talking about a single post.

You aren't talking about anything, you're just whining.

Like a kid who isn't getting his way.

I was talking about YOU.

That's because your entire world revolves around me.

You're still going with the notion you don't make shootings about the shooter's political affiliation?

It seems difficult for you to accept that some people are against all mass shooters regardless of their political affiliations. Most likely because of what I posted in #10.

You hear about a mass shooting and immediately start wondering how to justify it if the shooter was one of your Deplorable Trumping brethren.

Remind me again, how much did you send to Rittenhouse's gofundme?

"I nailed him with #10"

My first post was #16.

Yep. Whining about #10. Thanks for confirming.

I didn't read the rest of that steaming pile.

You literally haven't posted anything on this thread worth reading.

It's obvious you're only looking for attention.

How desperate.

I'm saying it's exactly as political as when Clown whines that a white guy in Texas hasn't been prosecuted for shooting his daughter and it's all because he's white and a Trumper.

It's the same kind of political. That's what I'm saying.
#50 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Hey stupid.

You haven't explained how my response is political.

Point out any mass shooting where I responded based on the persons political affiliation.

Meanwhile, you bring up an example of Republicans ignoring a murder because the murderer happens to be a Trump supporting white guy.

And that's supposed to support your argument, how?

Why don't you stop all your whining and provide proof rather than posting your alleged bullshht.

Are you trying to say that isn't somehow politcal?
#47 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

He's not really saying anything.

Just trying his hardest to troll.

His every post on this thread has been directed at me because clearly I nailed him with #10 and he can't stop yelping.

you always say that when you're identified for exactly what you are...

I love how self assured you are despite all facts to the contrary.

It's this ignorant confidence that really makes America the greatest nation on the planet.

Was the shooter trans?

If the shooter were trans there would be legislation passed in Texas imprisoning anyone in the state who identifies as trans.

But it's the murderer is a Trump supporting White guy.

So it's not even manslaughter.

Answer my questions first.

You poor, poor thing. Don't worry about it. The questions were rhetorical. I already know the answers.

Admit you run to the political affiliation of the shooter faster than Boaz does.
#40 | POSTED BY EBERLY

If you actually read my first post it was more of a, "who gives a shht about a mass shooting in Canada when we don't care about mass shootings in America."

You really suck at psychoanalysis and are generally wrong when you do your Nostradumas routine.

Republicans base their opinions about everything - like whether pedophilia is bad - on the political affiliation of the people committing the crime.

Eberly is no different. He's furious - despite the shooter being Canadian - this hasn't turned into a discussion about the shooter's political affiliation yet.

Perhaps Redial would be a better target since I couldn't name the political parties in Canada if my life depended on it.

A stack of Playboys?

Playboys were fine.

Hustler was much better.

There were plenty of pornographic magazines other than just those.

He Eberly,

This guy killed his daughter after a disagreement and the jury couldn't even indict him with manslaughter.

Are you going to pretend the same would be true if the father was an immigrant? Or Black? Or Trans?

You're denying you've made an issue out of the political affiliation of the shooter in the past?

You're denying you've never sought out their political affiliation and blamed their actions on the right wing trash message that's corrupted them?
#32 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Yes or No:

1) Are you denying the fact the majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists in America are Rightwing morons?

2) Are you pretending I change my opinion about mass shooters based on their political affiliation?

3) Were you triggered because I accurately described rightwinger's fluctuating opinions about criminals based on the race, gender, sexual preference and political affiliation of the criminal?

Honestly. I think you saw something I posted and were eager for my attention.

Boaz: "Why isn't anyone paying attention to the trans shooter! The media is ignoring it!"

Me: "Mass shootings don't receive attention these days. Your only interest is that the shooter is trans."

Eberly: "Political affiliation!"

The political affiliation matters

My view of the matter doesn't change based on the identity of who the shooter is.

Find any post of me from any thread, ever, where I defend the shooter based on their political affiliation.

What an idiot you are.

Meanwhile.

For people like Boaz, that's all that matters.

Keep spinning, *itch.

Maybe sooner or later you'll posting something worth discussing.

Before the internet, obtaining porn usually meant going to a local adult bookstore.

Or your friend's older brother's room.

Or your friend's dad's stash.

Next to the booze and cigs.

Sure, access to porn has never been easier, but it wasn't really difficult to find.

It never involved an adult bookstore, that's for sure.

There have already been 25 mass shootings in America in 2026, can anyone point to one our mainstream news outlets covered?

#22 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Are you denying white men constitute the majority of mass shooters in America?

Are you denying media coverage of white male shooters uses different language than if the shooter had been Black, a minority or LGBTQ?

Here's an added bonus, Republicans love starting gofundme accounts for white mass shooters.

you forgot rightwing
#16 | POSTED BY EBERLY

They wouldn't allow it if I tried.

Much like Trump, you're all attention whores.

Read your post if you need an example.

The mainstream media is ignoring the horrors Trump's federal administration is unleashing on Minnesota.

Americans are being denied their civil rights by ICE, aka Trump's Gestapo.

Meanwhile Boaz has Google alerts turned on for any news about transgender people.

What a ------- weirdo.