"ask him to provide it or admit that he lied"

The only thing I'll ever admit is you're too stupid to understand the equation you're discussing.

"You made the claim that the .1% received over 50% of the Trump tax cuts and I asked your to support that with a link."

Then I linked the Trump tax code. It's right there.

Then I looked further into your article: it only covered Americans. Foreign investors were left out, and they got over 15%. We know that, because American workers got 15%, and Foreign investors got MORE.

Finally, the equation used (just like they're doing again, now), only counts the Front End of the equation, the $1.8 Trillion borrowed. It completely left out the money earned as interest on that new debt, making the total closer to $2.3 Trillion. Call me crazy, but I'm assuming the folks with the most assets saw most of the interest, just like in real life.

Add it all up. Not just the cherry-picked numbers. Not just Americans, and just the front-end costs. THE WHOLE EQUATION.

Like I said, links don't mean a damn thing, if your analysis sucks.

"For what it's worth, I attended commitment ceremonies back when I was part of the gay lifestyle"

For what it's worth, what did you tell the attendees at YOUR commitment ceremony?

"I am the only one on this website that actually supplies links to back up my data."

What a riot.

You're the moron who tried to link vaccines with death (stating the vaccines "resulted" in many deaths), and linked to the VAERS site for proof. Trouble was, your link SPECIFICALLY WARNED against morons like you, stating they'd investigated EVERY QUESTIONABLE DEATH, and only the two known cases from the J&J vaccine had resulted in death, to that point.

Another time, you boasted about a village which was COVID-free, despite only having 9.8% of their populace vaccinated. It turned out you were misreading commas vs. periods with European reporting, and the vax rate was 98%.

Having links doesn't mean having proof; especially when your analytic skills suck.

"Like when the Dish ran away with the Spoon!"

Let's just say, they weren't Forkin' around!

"Men worship women."

Only if they can control them.

" They worship the -----."

Only if they can control them.

"Marriage is still only between a man and a woman and always will be no matter what the courts say about it"

Congress also said.

Just look at the 1040 for proof; it's the "Married, Filing Jointly" section.

"I don't believe gay marriages are sanctioned by the Bible."

It falls under the same condemnation as poly-cotton shirts, fresh haircuts, and shrimp cocktail.

"The number of those 2.1 million people that are here illegally should be zero. "

Let's say you get your way. That means most of the harvestable food will rot in the fields. Is that your goal?

And is your ultimate goal that Americans will become so hungry, they'll TAKE the harvest jobs? And show up?

Is all THAT the goal...just so Elon can get another tax cut???

"When illegals are not allowed to be in the country, whether the employer wants to hire them no longer matters."

You'd have a point...if the hirers weren't advertising in Spanish, in Mexico.

"I am not saying don't jail employers. I am 100% for that too"

The folks you vote for don't feel that way. in fact, aren't most of these, say, meat-packing plants in Republican counties with Republican Sheriffs, where the Republicans members of the Chamber of Commerce are the largest contributors to the Republican Sheriffs' re-election campaigns?

We've got one poster, in a red county and a red state, who does business with the hirers...and everybody knows the illegals work there.

"GOP to Pay for Trump Tax Cuts With Sales of Public Land"

All due respect, the headline is incorrect. It should be:

GOP to Use Sale of Public Land to Justify TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS in New Borrowing for Tax Cuts

Maybe it was the character limit....

"It is no longer debatable"

But is it sensible?

Will it be considered wise, once harvests fall short, and food prices spike? That's an obviously observable outcome.

And will Trump take responsibility? Or will the bad results be Biden's fault?

How far back do you want to go?

"As far as you're honest."

Annnnnd, he couldn't even go there.

"Political War Zone. The biggest sub group failure on the internet."

Oh, come now...they proved they could ALMOST handle the really tough issues. Like...a fantasy football league. Almost.

Is it their fault the place self-immolated?

"How far back do you want to go? "

As far as you're honest.

"I AM INEVITABLE"

Whatever you say, Wrecks.

"This is great!"

Really?!?

You just admitted you're willing to break the law, expose yourself, assault others, and harm innocents...as long as it gives you the feeling of owning teh libz.

Peak Republican.

"Call me some more hateful names!"

Well, what other name(s) have you posted under?

"The hate you are trying to unleash on the Other can just as easily be turned on you some day."

Which reminds me...doesn't ChiliGordo sound Venezuelan to you???

Since...you know...all that counts is the ACCUSATION, amirite?

"Maybe it was brought up when you were serving one of your 2000 dudes?"

Your closeted fantasies never seem to change.

Like I said, whenever someone brings up gay sex again and again and again and again and again ... it becomes obvious.

Meanwhile, the 2000 commercial gigs I did as a working actor are now paying me a pair of pensions.

Closet boy must be convinced there is only kind of job in the arts industry. Based on his consumption, no doubt.

"You didn't do that. You chose to lie instead."
~Snoofy

(Unrecognized) Newsworthy Flag

"I've always been out."
~BillJohnson

Not on the day of your wedding.

"Illegal immigrants have no constitutional rights"

Be sure to use only one page of the Constitution at a time to wipe your backside.

Being so full of it, you'd be wise to ration.

" 2000 guys blown and still going strong was what you bragged about"

No, I never said that. YOU were the one who made that conclusion.

But we get it: you're a severely closeted individual. That's why so many of your posts refer to gay sex.

If I was in a conversation with folks, and one person kept bringing up BJs and TruckStop sex, I'd conclude the problem was with THEM.

"Driving was great."

Telling, that's what remains with you, five years later.

"Obviously not paying attention"

On the contrary, I was paying attention. That's why I blame Trump. Meanwhile, please explain the difference between the economy Trump got from Obama, and the economy Trump handed off to Biden.

You won't, of course, because you can't. As Snoofy pointed out, once again you run away when challenged by a question you refuse to answer.