" By a very small handful of wealthy individuals"

Total lie. Virtually every one of my self-employed clients used it.

I'm done; you're not even TRYING to be truthful.

" Are real wages under Trump INCREASING OR DECREASING"

They're currently increasing 4.4%. However ...

Last time tallied, that number was higher.

The rate DECREASED to 4.4%.

You claimed INCREASING.

Now, once caught, you want to move the goalposts, again.

"YOU ARE NOT A TAX PREPARER."

Another lie.

And since you've made that claim over a dozen times, that's over a dozen lies.

So much for your bullschitt claim of bringing the truth.

You're just a garden variety prevaricator.

" This was NOT an individual targeted provision"

It was a tax break individuals used, which expired. Who gives AF where it was targeted, the expiration LANDED on INDIVIDUALS as well as corporations.

Put those goalposts back where you found them.

" You really aren't good at this debating thing."

Not when I'm up against a liar too ignorant to know when he's wrong.

----, you can't even be honest about INCREASING and DECREASING.

Too stupid? Or a liar?

" Yes - a corporate targeted provision."

USED BY INDIVIDUALS, even those not incorporated.

You asked, I delivered.

Now, are you too dumb to understand? Or are you planning on moving the goalposts again?

" I then challenged you to post a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL PROVISION"

And I did: bonus deprecation.

Now, are you going to pretend individuals didn't benefit from bonus deprecation?

My self-employed clients certainly did.

Also, when yearly caps remain the same, (like the onset of taxing Social Security), each successive year represents a tax increase, especially when other caps (like inheritance tax) are pegged to annual inflation. Any advantage the regular taxpayer had is past. Meanwhile, the corporate tax cuts were made permanent.

But I get it: these concepts are too advanced for you to grasp.

" The FACT is that REAL WAGES are positive and increasing under Trump."

Both the same-job and the changed job numbers were HIGHER last time they were tallied.

That means the margins are DECREASING, not increasing like you claimed.

Were you lying? Or are you too stupid to know 4.4% is LOWER than the prior tally?

"What is the pathological need on your part to continue to lie despite being caught red handed?"

My irony meter just exploded.

Tell us again how a head of lettuce won't be more expensive in a month.

Oh, and that 4.4% annualized gain you were celebrating? It's down from the last measure ... something you omitted, despite it being the salient fact.

So ... you were saying your hands are red?!?

"You literally claim to be a 'tax preparer' ... "

That's only because I've literally been one for 37 years.

" ... and claimed THE MAJORITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS OF THE TRUMP TAX CUTS HAVE ALREADY EXPIRED."

Oh, I never claimed that, as I never would. I said SOME aspects had expired.

Good God, man, you lie almost every time you post.

"Please tell the world (how) stupid you are."

Have you found those studies showing ear cartilage DOES grow back?

And what's your theory as to why no doctors held any press conferences?

C'mon, man. Show us how smart you are.

"I do feel sorry about having debunked your whole 'tax preparer' cosplay act"

See? ANOTHER lie.

Thanks for proving, once again, you don't know the truth from a hole in the ground.

" The first lie I say on here will be my first. "

Your bullschitt about the price of lettuce, where there are NO supply-chain glitches, and 100% of the workers show up, proves you don't understand the truth well enough to realize when you're lying.

You also didn't know the difference between direct ownership and indirect ownership. Again, too stupid to know your claim is false.

You're basically rounding first, unaware the catcher is still holding strike three.

"I have NEVER made that argument. I said that the .1% probably own US government debt in the same % that they own US stocks - which is much less than 50%.

Oh, so now you DO remember that discussion.

Thank for admitting you lied.

And you still haven't shown you understand the difference between direct ownership and indirect ownership.

"have you learned how to read a chart yet?"

Was that the chart where you only counted Americans, and not the WORLD's wealthiest?

"That has never been an argument that we have had"

Yes it was, liar. The subject was interest on the cost of Trump's tax giveaways, and you claimed the world's wealthiest held miniscule amounts of US Debt.

You only counted DIRECT ownership. And proved you had no clue regarding INDIRECT ownership.

But watch: you'll deny and lie, again.

"You want to admit that you didn't know how to read a chart yet?"

What a riot.

You're the moron who didn't know the difference between DIRECT ownership of US Debt, and INDIRECT ownership, like through a mutual fund.

Your self-aggrandizing is always tied to your stupidity.

"We had this whole discussion a few weeks back where I gave you -------- the real numbers."

Numbers which assumed/pretended no other supply chain problems.

All predictions go out the window when 80% of your workers don't show up.

"Trump had 2 people murdered in a Pennsylvania field so he could stage a photo op."

Feel free to post studies which show ear cartilage can regrow.

In 3 days.

Then explain why doctors never gave a press conference.

"It's exactly what the last administration attempted to do with Donald Trump"

Since you are talking about Lawfare, how about if you point to any one of Trumps 91 indictments which you or I could do without any fear of legal repercussions.

And if you can't, at least have the nads to admit as much.

"IT DOESN'T WORK !! because most people don't care."

Says the guy who cares enough to post about it.

It's like the comedy writes itself!

"Wages continue to be a more positive indicator in the labor market"

Not for the unemployed.

And the job predictions were off by over 120,000.

" Sounds like a "their" country problem, not ours"

Same answer Cain gave God when He asked about Abel: Am I my brother's keeper?

"why did your party stage a soft coup?"

... Asks the moron who never asked why his party staged a hard coup.

It's like the comedy writes itself!

"CA is ranked ... #1 in income inequality."

Well, of course it is.

Anyplace with the greatest opportunities will reflect the greatest income inequalities.

You either understand that macro, or you don't.

You clearly don't.