" Is that all people or just the ones who think like you?"

Everybody.

Even your wife.

" Do you know what selective editing is?"

Sure I do. Do you know what quotes around a phrase means?

Explain how Kirk didn't mean the actual words that came out of his mouth.

" How do you feel about this comment:"

It's cold and unfeeling. It lacks empathy.

Remind us how Charlie felt about empathy. Do you need a direct quote?

" Do you believe Kirk advocated the stoning of homosexuals?"

Why else would he call stoning "God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters"...?

Feel free to tell us "what he REALLY meant" by that.

" I'm endorsing someone's behavior?"

You're soaked from trying to carry all that water.

You even used the word "IF" when referring to A DIRECT QUOTE.

" To be honest, if history says Kirk claimed black women are worthless and can't do ---- on their own ... ... that's how it goes."

If? YOU WERE GIVEN THE DIRECT QUOTE.

And if you want to deny facts in front of your face ... that's how it goes.

Right?

" You're pretending to be offended by that. You're not."

You're clueless.

Of course I'm offended; I'm a human being who believes others deserve to be treated with dignity.

More to the point, why are you endorsing behavior you'd try to eliminate if it was your son making these ugly statements?

" He was referencing 2 successful black women"

And then made it about Black Women.

It's pretty damned clear, to anyone but a water-carrier.

Did you read the quote, or is FoxNews filtering it all for you?

" Pointing out the obvious mis-quotes"

I linked to actual quotes.

Why you can't deal with that is beyond me.

"I don't think you are."

Tell me you didn't read the link without using those specific words.

" You believe he was talking about all black women?"

You believe he wasn't?!?

Feel free to point out his caveat. At this point, you're pretending there is one.

BTW, you might want to read my link before embarrassing yourself.

" Do you believe all "offended" claims are legit?"

I believe the quotes are quotes. You?

" But you're offended by them?"

The actual quotes? Yes.

My guess is you disbelieve the majority of the 14 DIRECT QUOTES in my link.

Here are ACTUAL quotes.

" Have you actually read or seen what he actually said?"

Yes; I'm aware of the mis-quotes.

You seem to be unaware of the actual quotes.

" You've been given tons of evidence. Twitter files."

Which showed ZERO instances of the government overriding the editorial board.

"Zuckerberg's own admission."

Of NOTHING. The fact Zuckerberg wasn't SPECIFIC makes it painfully obvious it was embarrassing to Zuck, otherwise he would've NAMED what the government was trying to censor.

Clearly, it was something like "the Drinking Bleach challenge".

But you're already on record supporting MALINFORMATION, the kind of post which could injure or kill others. And why?!?

Water-carrying partisanship.

" Thats how it works. People pretending to be offended at things"

You've read his quotes about blacks, especially black women. Would you be offended if he claimed those types of things about you?

I mean, you only have your job because you're white, male, and a Republican nepo baby. No qualifications whatsoever.

Right?

Insulting, or is the lie okay with you?

" prominent members in the media and somewhat influential commentators claiming he got what he deserved."

Not what he "deserved"; no one deserves assassination. He got what he championed.

WORLD of difference.

BillJohnson's posts are much easier to understand once you realize he will NEVER excuse Democrats for nominating SC justices who legalized gay marriage.

He blames Democrats for invalidating his life choices, while secretly pining for the love of his life he never persued.

Dems' fault, amirite?

" It's too bad ----------- didn't tell them to pound sand."

Zucker never mentioned WHAT was "censored", when there was every reason to ... unless it was embarrassing to Zuck, of course.

Since Zuck avoided the specifics, the only logical conclusion is, it was about the impossibility of overdosing on ivermectin.

Basically, the Tide Pods challenge of COVID.

Further proof: Trump isn't expecting to get $15 Billion from NBC. He's expecting them to spend a lot of money, against his unlimited budget.

Is that the Republican ideal? Or are we dealing with a cult?

" ABC is scared of their advertisers and viewers."

Nonsense.

The suits at Disney realize a win in public would lead to A LOT of losses on paper ... which is all that matters. Paramount's payoff was a rounding error in its merger.

Meanwhile, the current POTUS is shaking down corporate America, and Republicans are fine with that.

" I oppose ALL efforts by our government to engage in censorship"

When will you be posting your first thread about the guy who ADMITTED he's doing it?

"You actively cheered a censorship regime for 4 years."

You've made that claim dozens of times, and dozens of times you've been asked to point to ONE EXAMPLE.

So far, zero-for-everything.

You're not even batting above The Mendoza Line.

Meanwhile, Trump LITERALLY STATES HE's WEAPONIZING the Justice Department, and you don't make a peep.

STFD and STFU.

" everyone not gay had to evolve on this issue at some point."

Nah ... I recognized from the jump gays were being treated as second-class citizens.