" If we gotta go back 6 years to find a lie.."

Haven't you been paying attention?!? It hasn't been SIX DAYS since that lie was repeated.

Six years later, and you STILL can't handle the truth.

"The Epstein-Trump Airport?"

Let's just remove the last two letters of Dulles.

Bingo! Airport is named after Trump, sans the naming fees. Win-win.

" it's been proved nothing is there" (regarding Trump)
~Boaz

You're either joking, or you're a joke.

"IF you read any of that you would know it means she, at a minimum, must cooperate as a witness to the claim."

You just basically said rape is allowable, if you can silence the victim.

Republican Family Values!

""credible" doesn't mean the woman's claims were verified"

You're right. It just means "Based on this evidence, and this perpetrator...it's mighty damned likely."

"whatever you have to do repeating a lie"

What a riot.

Tell us: who won the 2020 Presidential election?

"Acknowledge abortions are human lives."

Why? the Bible doesn't.

In fact, It specifically references "the quickening", aka the first time the mother feels the baby moving in the womb.

That's definitely NOT at 6 weeks.

"Who is at fault for the leak"

Certainly not Wes Moore.

But nice deflection! And thanks for admitting you've never seen him interviewed.

"DEI Wes Moore"

Tell us you've never seen him interviewed, without using those specific words.

"we have a spending problem"

Borrowing an extra $5 Trillion to give away via tax cuts to the world's wealthiest is SPENDING, Einstein.

"Would also apply to the possibly-renamed Dulles Airport?"

Of course.

Better yet, do a Reverse-Trump: Just remove the last two letters from the name, and poof! You've named it after our current President without having to pay naming rights!

"The right doesn't do responsibility."

Sure it does; It's just always someone else's.

Seriously: every single time The Party of Responsibility references responsibility, they're NOT talking about themselves.

"I wonder where they got THAT idea." (That the other side was doing it.)

From BillJohnson.

He sliced open the pillowcase on the hill in the windstorm, and the stray feathers (of his lies) the Bible commands him to collect...keep getting found by idiots.

" #30 | POSTED BY MSGT"

Three quick questions:

#1 Do you believe in-person, same-day voting is subject to suppression tactics, like long lines, construction on main thoroughfares, and busline disruptions?

#2: Do you believe it be made easier, or more difficult, for a legal voter to cast a legal vote?

#3 Who do you believe should decide the easiest way to cast their vote: Them, or you?

I know you don't usually answer direct questions. I hope this is the exception. Thanks.

"It seems the majority of folks who are convicted voter fraud are GOP supporters. Hmmmm...."

Years back, during the Brownback Error in Kansas, AG Kris Kobach begged the Legislature to fund efforts to crack down on illegal immigrants voting, saying he had "over 100 cases ready to file".

The Legislature gave him millions...and after four years, Kobach had exactly NINE convictions, all detailed on the Heritage Foundation's website.
https://electionfraud.heritage.org

IIRC, two were addled elderly, three were folks who moved from (super red) western Kansas to (super red) Eastern Colorado, three were garden variety: a recently deceased MIL or spouse (one guy got caught by putting the actual date he signed on the ballot!), and ONE, count 'em, ONE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT.

When asked HOW these folks voted, Kobach's office said they didn't keep track. If anyone believes that cow manure, I've got a bridge to sell you.

"New York City's budget is bigger than Florida State's budget"

Florida produces 1.7 Trillion of GDP, and doesn't have to connect everything via subway.

NYC alone produces 1.3 Trillion of GDP, and a sizable part of that city is underground.

Your surprise is based on your current knowledge.

"battle with anti-American forces on the left."

What liars.

The only battle they're in is with anti-TRUMP forces.

"You're engaging in project. Just because you are an unprincipled hack doesn't mean everyone else is too."
~BellRinger

Ah, THAT's the reason my irony meter exploded so loudly.

" Obama used the IRS against the Tea Party."

Admit to us you're ignorant of the IG report without using those specific words.

FTW, the IG found nothing malicious; there were certain words which kicked out applications for further review. "Patriot" in the name was one word; so was the word "green".

In fact, there were more "left-leaning" words than "right-leaning" words.

The IG concluded the only reason more conservative groups were targeted, was because they had a majority of the applications.

Also, applicants were allowed to operate upon application (i.e., assume acceptance) and ONLY ONE was turned down ...

... a left-leaning group.

What news outlets aren't giving you the full, honest truth???

" You cheered when Biden's handlers were jawboning tech companies into being their personal censors."

What a riot. Zuckerberg never MENTIONED what that was about, despite the fact he'd have every reason to divulge it ...

... if it would've bolstered his case.

The fact he didn't, suggests we're talking about something akin to the EAT TIDE PODS campaign.

Censorship is only when the editorial board DISAGREES, and they're forced to do something AGAINST their will.

For clarity:
" any honest analysis will prove it's a ridiculous ROI..."

Up to $10,000 and a year in jail for EACH vote.

"...very difficult to execute"

I meant to be more specific: in person, since you'd need disguises, have to get back in line each time, and risk someone recognizing you, or you choosing someone who's already voted.

"...never at scale"

Not by the voter, ever. Only by Cullers and Counters.

"...and in 90+% of the elections, already moot."

Fraudulent votes for President in Wyoming, California, West Virginia, or NY?!? GTFOH.

"I was not aware non citizens can get social security numbers."

They have to have a willing employer first. They don't just get handed out.

"We know it is happening but we cant prove it, just believe us..."

"...because we're going to suppress every blue district we can. Accuse and suppress."

" It can affect the outcome of a very close election."

ONE fraudulent vote?

Because fraud at scale is self-defeating: the larger it is, the more impossible to keep secret. According to the HF, when it's a voter committing vote fraud, it's almost exclusively ONE vote.

And keep in mind: all fraudulent votes are assumed to split down the middle; one side would have to do it A LOT MORE than the other to make any difference. Even if one side does it at 150% the rate of the other, that still negates 80% of the fraudulent votes.

Interesting fact: the most common reason given by a convicted vote fraudster, when a reason was given, was I thought the other side was doing it.

"The false presumption is all fraud gets uncovered."

You're right; it can't be found 100% of the time.

But any honest analysis will prove it's a ridiculous ROI, very difficult to execute, never at scale, and in 90+% of the elections, already moot.

Meanwhile, Trump and the Republicans plan to suppress more votes this November than all the convictions on the 25+ yr Heritage Foundation website.