"...Charlottesville a completely astroturfed event..."

Remind us who paid for the khakis, the polo shirts, and the Tiki torches.

"Structural Exile 2022-2024 - Frozen bank accounts. Jailed for social media posts. Credentials erased from professional life."

Jailed for social media posts?!? By a "Leftist" DOJ?!? Who was jailing these "posters"?

And can you give an example of where someone's professional credentials were "erased"???

Because this reads like fantastical boolsheet.

"No one cheered on anyone."

Not based on the "news" outlets MAGAts follow, no.

"Yeah by but people that aren't citizens?"

Good point.

It's usually citizens.

" Today there are little to no organizational race hate groups"

So ... those guys chanting Jews will not replace us! just HAPPENED to all be wearing khakis and polo shirts and carrying tiki torches? All by chance?!?

What are the odds?

" They weren't against "racist" police. The US has the least racist, most tolerant police in the world"

You're joking, right?!?

If not ... pick up a history book, ffs.

" Coercing people to vote a certain way would be untraceable."

Nonsense.

Tens of thousands of cases would produce victims. There is no way in heaven , hell, or anywhere in between, where there are tens of thousands of victims, and ZERO come forward.

Especially after a close election. They'd be coming out of the woodwork ... if only they existed.

"Do you believe "ballot harvesting" is a real thing or just fear mongering?"

I believe if tens of thousands of victims had their ballot taken from them, AT LEAST ONE would come forward with that claim.

I also believe the lack of AT LEAST ONE PERSON making your claim proves it's pure fantasy.

" In my mind the VA redistricting has nothing to do with Texas or any other state."

In your mind, tens of thousands of invisible people stole mail-in ballots from housemates and deprived Trump of his rightful 2020 win.

Doesn't make either one of them true.

"Kamala Harris."

So ... NOT a racist, NOT a crook, and NOT a pedephile.

" Who is this "perceived enemy" you are referring to?"

The ones you treated as the least of your brethren.

They lost representational rights, but you couldn't be bothered to defend their representation ... only concerned about YOURS.

""very upset" is a stretch."

Nonsense.

In one case, it led you to say NOTHING. In the other, you're claiming NO FAIR...despite the fact the issue was put before the voters.

So you're definitely "upset" enough to post about it...in ONLY ONE of the cases.

"I live in Virginia, so now it actually affects me."

Even more damning: you were dead silent when it was happening to a perceived enemy, but upset enough to post when it's YOUR rights on the line.

"I don't comment on everything. So what's your point?"

You were fine when Republicans did it for an advantage without public approval, yet VERY UPSET when Democrats did it WITH public approval.

So it's not the action, it's the letter after the name that determines your morality, or lack of it.

"Is it fair? No."

That's A LOT more than you ever said when Republicans did it. Why weren't you just as upset at Republicans?

(...I'm just kidding...we all know WHY.)

" Any time it gets talked about, people mention Texas."

Remember when you spoke out against the Texas redistricting?

No one else does either.

"Because US's historical allies are commiting hari-kari"

If you're trying to look stupid, you've succeeded. You're 180 degrees off.

" When does ignoring IP law become an act of entrepreneurial Capitalism?"

When the thief gets to define the terms.

"If the only justification is "Texas did it", that's pretty lame."

Translation:
When Texas did it, it was okay. When Dems did it better...NO FAIR! Waaaaaaah!!!

" This post didn't age well."

Somebody named Pirro on line #1 for you.

" Get back to me when Trump sells our strategic petroleum reserves..."

What a riot.

Biden bought back the gas for less than he sold it for. If Trump had done as much, you'd be lined up to lick his taint.

Instead, Trump started a war with an oil supplier WITHOUT buying back the SPR first.

Dumb as a rock ... and you support it.

" ... famously opined that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if asked to do so."

True.

Meanwhile, based on what the Trump DOJ has done to date, it's clear the Grand Jury WON T indict bologna.

" I don't support him."

... until I get to the ballot box.

At least finish the sentence honestly.

"Due process. What a riot."
~Today's Constitutional Republicans

When, specifically, did they cease being "persons"?

" Undocumented immigrants placed in expedited removal proceedings are entitled to access the asylum system if they express fear of persecution, torture, or of returning to their home country."

That didn't happen with the El Salvador bunch.

So much for written guarantees.

" My answer, again: Hyperbole."

IOW, bullllschittt.

You can't name a single Dem Communist, because you're reckless with definitions.

Get caught lying, and suddenly your excuse is "hyperbole". Last time it was "shooting from the hip".

Either way you're lying. For attention.

" If one enters illegally they are eligible for deportation."

Only if they stop being "persons".

When, specifically, did these folks cease to be persons???

FFA, you're lying AGAIN.