"He actually has something to say. But, like I said, he has plenty of time to shoot himself in the foot."

In other words, you have nothing specifically against him, other than your feelings.

"You're a very single minded person."

Funny how FACTS and PROOF require as much, eh?

"I never said her laugh was THE reason I didn't vote for her."

Of course not.

The reason you didn't vote for her is the letter (D) after her name.

It certainly isn't her politics; you can't say what she stood for you're against.

"The sort of job I did for decades, you'd be overwhelmed."

What a riot.

You were a glorified Excel Spreadsheet installer.

But I'll bet you were top of your class at Dunning-Kruger!

"Trump or Cackles. That was the choice."

FFS, just admit if it wasn't her laugh, you would've found something else insignificant yet disqualifying.

It's obviously not her politics; you can't name the stances she took you're against.

" And, he does a little too much grinning"

Thanks for proving my point you're willing to find ANYTHING against a Democratic, no matter how far you have to move the goalposts. "He's with Obama; he's grinning too much." Recently, it was "She laughed inappropriately".

Meanwhile, if he had an (R) after the name, you'd line up to lick his taint.

" You are absolutely the worst on this site I've responded to."

You're just embarrassed I keep pointing out how
cockamamie your theory is, and reminding folks you still have ZERO victims coming forward, even after nearly six years.

You even refuse to address ANY of my salient points about voter suppression.

Go ahead and plonk me, coward. No skin off my nose.

" You're obsessed with that idea I am against gay marriage."

I watched you turn against Democrats the moment gay marriage became legal, and I've seen you time and again suggest it was later, when Trump came on the scene.

"You are a non-stop liar."

What a riot, coming from someone who lied to the military, lied to the public, and continues to lie about the efficacy of mail-in ballots, even after failing to find ANY PROOF after five and a half years.

" he needs to stand on his own words and ditch Obama."

BillJohnson blames Obama for making gay marriage legal. He'll NEVER forgive Obama. Never.

"Enterprises that bleed $40 million per year get cut."

Now do Truth Social.

" It's not my claim. It's been publicly disclosed by CBS ... "

CBS gets to choose which part of the equation it includes, and which part it omits, like streaming income based on the show and its clips.

It's the equivalent of falling for the numbers the government is currently proffering.

" if he really wants to get the attention of Republicans he needs to stand on his own words"

So ... the words he speaks (the words of Jesus) aren't enough?!?

" ... ask mayors of blue sanctuary cities when illegal Aline's get bussed in by the thousands."

That's because NO SYSTEM is designed for thousands of people to be dropped off on your neighbor's lawn.

Are you pretending to be stupid? Or are you not pretending?!?

" These people are resource drains."

That's not what folks who understand the equation say.

What kind of Math are you using? Actual Math, which says something else entirely, or Republican Math, where you use whatever number fits your talking points???

" So, how much of the $1.7B does she get?"

Twice what Hunter Biden does!

"Not exactly true."

What part, specifically? Because I can provide links to prove the claims are EXACTLY true.

Will you address the truth, or run from it?

"This is my personal educated guess."

Educated?!?

You refuse to read links, you refuse to study the Heritage Foundation's decades of research, you refuse to adhere to the most basic concept of science: proof.

Your education consists of you telling yourself your guesses are correct. That's not "educated". That's self-deluded.

"My opinions on mail-in ballots are not based on emotions."

WHAT?!?

You FINALLY have proof of purloined ballots??? Link to it!

Oh, wait ... you've got no links? ZERO proof?

That's just fee-fees, buddy. You've created a fantasy based on wish-casting.

" Trump has been dealing with politically motivated accusations and prosecutions for years. That's lawfare."

You've given the definition incorrectly; you're missing the central tenet.

The definition of lawfare is prosecuting someone for an action ANYONE ELSE COULD DO WITHOUT FEAR OF LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS.

Trump was NEVER subject to lawfare, as the courts held time and again.

As for you, you can't name a single one of Trump's 91 indictments which you or I could've done without fear of legal repercussions.

I know: I've been asking for an example of lawfare for years, and no one has been able to come up with any proof of a single example. You remember proof, don't you, Bill?

"Thank God she lost."

Admit you're a Slurper without using those specific words.

"Unless Obama was going to be the one really running things again like many people believe he did during Biden's presidency."

Is that what YOU believe, Bill?

And do you have any proof, or this another of your "gut feelings" with no proof whatsoever?

"I just find it hard to believe she actually got so many people to vote for her."

Well, what percentage of her votes do you believe were out-and-out illegal?

" It's immaterial for what I said. Biden pardoned his family."

If you think Biden pardoning his family AFTER the PRESIDENT-ELECT had publicly threatened lawfare against them is immaterial, you're a moron.

" I don't want to suppress votes."

What a riot.

You can't even admit same-day, in-person voting is easy to manipulate.

" I'm wondering how many are bogus. You know....illegal."

Try researching folks who actually look into this stuff, like the Heritage Foundation. You'll find that number is much closer to zero than you currently imagine.

Then again, they only operate on facts, not gut feelings with zero empirical proof, so you may not like what you find.

Can you handle the truth?