#24 If they have the votes to pass M4A that would be great, but if they don't, then they should at least lower the Medicare eligibility age to 55. That would cover a lot of people who are getting to the age where they have more health problems and I think it would also soften the ground to transitioning to M4A, which the ultimate goal.

Inquiring minds want to know: Is Judge Alito's wife flying the American flag upside down outside their house today?

As seen elsewhere: "Trump failed at regime change in Iran but succeeded in Texas."

for how long?
#9 | Posted by eberly

Until we can have a serious discussion about healthcare in this country?

#184 Exactly. Too big to rig. Even if Dan Sullivan were to lose in Alaska, what could what it do to make a federal case out of it when one more vote in the Senate isn't going to flip the chamber to Republicans?

They need to do something about healthcare prices. Restore ACA subsidies, pass a bill for Medicare for folks 55 and over (even if Trump vetoes it), pass a bill to send money to rural communities to shore up healthcare facilities in that are in danger of going bankrupt.They aren't going to be able to lower costs across the board, but they need to be seen making good faith efforts to do so.

If we don't pack the SCOTUS within the 1st year, I will be disappointed.
#4 | Posted by Wardog

You want them to pack the court while Trump is still president? Exactly how would that work?

#24 Agreed. Dems need to walk and chew gum. IOW, they need to address issues of both affordability and accountability.