464. Your lying on both counts b struck by the front bumper. On video. Shot through the windshield.. on video.

Nice try.

454. Of course this happened. He was standing there and she drive right into him. What part of that isn't intentional?

450. How was she innocent after intentionally striking an officer with her car?

This is the part I don't understand. That's not normally or acceptable behavior.

447. So cops should let themselves get killed or maimed by being run over because her intent "might" have been just to get away?

You don't see that as a problem?

I'm genuinely curious how you've arrived at that.

I'm the only one discussing the actual physical evidence.

Was he stack by the front bumper? It's yes or no.

Did he shoot from the front of the vehicle? Also yes or no.

The answer according to the evidence is yes. And therefore under the legal definition of deadly force, it's justified.

Those are the only salient facts.

An officer was in the road. She didn't want to listen to them. Tried to drive away directly into an officer, and he defended himself.

Any other points are trying to bring emotion and feelings into it.

Oh so you are going to lie and say he didn't get struck by her FRONT bumper or shoot through her windshield ... .

Despite the video evidence and the mountain of physical evidence?

Well that's dumb. But I guess it didn't fit your narrative. Good luck with ignoring evidence and legal precedent so you can be right in your own mind.

Okay. Now we are getting somewhere. You admit he was struck by the front bumper and shot through the windshield.

Great. You're almost there.

Now what's the legal definition of when deadly force is justified?

If she was turned away ... how did he get hit by her FRONT BUMPER? How did he shoot her through the WINDSHIELD?

Did he have the magic round chambered like Kennedy?

Stop it. Physics isn't going to cooperate with you so your lies can look correct.

Would a reasonable officer believe they or others were in danger of death or great bodily injury .

That's the standard legal definition of using deadly force.

Don't insert your own interpretation.

Anyone being hit by a car believes they are in danger of death or great bodily injury.

He shot from in front of the car, after being hit, through the windshield.

Right because no one could b possibly think they are in danger by someone driving into you and folding you over the hood of their car ... .

That makes complete sense.

Go stand in the street, I'll drive at you and hit you with the front bumper, and you tell me if you felt like you might get hurt.

To act ... bah. Old eyes and the phone gets me every time.

428. I don't disagree. But ... that doesn't give anyone the right knack the way they are in that city. ESPECIALLY like this.

She wasn't unarmed ... courts have ruled over and over that vehicles are 3000 pounds weapons. He doesn't have to be injured. That isn't the legal definition of when deadly force is justified.

The legal definition is: "would a reasonable officer believe there was a danger of death or great bodily injury to himself or others."

If you don't think that officer being struck by the front bumper of her car and shooting her while folded over the hood had a reasonable fear of death or great bodily injury, then you have never been under stress in your life. That he actually was hurt is immaterial, legally.

I didn't say anything about trump. I don't like nor did I vote for him all three times he ran. But I do support law enforcement.

I find this level of activity in Minneapolis unnecessary. But that's givers no one the right to act the way they are. Especially intentionally hitting a cop with their car.

Yeah you're right. He probably never will admit he's wrong.

Stop it. He was standing in the street. You don't get to claim he was "trying to stop her car." She was stopped they were trying to get her out of the car ... and he accelerated AT him.

You think that's okay?

Your crazy.

There is a photo circulating that I can't seem to add here showing that he shot through her windshield from the FRONT of the car as he was being hit by her car.

This is a tragedy. A tragedy of her own making.

I agree that this level of activity in Minneapolis is inflammatory and unnecessary. It shouldn't be happening. But it is. That doesn't give anyone the right to treat law enforcement the way that they are in the city. Harassing cops doing their job is incredibly stupid. The stories of what they are doing is craziness. Following them around ... blowing through red lights to keep up with them so they can find out where they live or are staying, slashing tires in hotel parking lots, aggressively filming, throwing snowballs with rocks in them, it's just not how you interact with law enforcement. Ever. They aren't "protecting their neighbors." They are shielding often heinous criminals ... . Or even minor law breakers that according to our laws need to go see a judge too determine if they can stay in the country.

Then there is this incident ... if you strike an officer with your 3000 pound weapon, he's going to shoot you through the windshield. And you will deserve it.

It's just that simple.

48. No it isn't. That is starting the clock halfway through the encounter. How can you think driving your car straight at an officer band striking him him with the front of you car WONT result in you being shot?

47. You clearly haven't watched the video I posted at ALL. he was hit by the front bumper THEN shot then crashed. You are the worst eye witness I've ever seen.

He shot her over the hood through the front windshield.

38 glad to see the mayor trying to not fan the flames of violence. Jesus.

36 you are on crack. She HIT him. How do you explain him folding over the bumper and onto the hood, if she cleared him. You are seeing what you want to see. Not what happened. Sad.

35. Were you standing in the road talking to the driver that hit you and then she drove straight at you and hit you? If that's what happened yes. If it was an accident? Then no.

Clearly she saw officers around and decided to drive right into one.

32 I am. He was struck by the FRONT bumper. That's an justified shooting she attempted to kill him