90 Umm Danforth, bringing someone here illegally before an immigration judge is the very definition of due process ... as outlined in case law, the United States Code, and the Constitution. What is it that you are trying to say here?

82 flag: thinks his mom is proud when he tells her he yelled at ICE today.

71 Flag: Mom should have swallowed.

That's what I figured. Impossible. Calling me qanon when I didn't vote for the current president in any of the three elections he has run is rich.

You do know it's possible to reach beyond "I hate Trump, Trump loves ICE, therefore I have to hate ICE." That's the only reason for the hatred.

Ensuring illegals get the due process of seeing an immigration judge just isn't that big of a deal. But good luck to you and your intellectually lazy reason to hate ICE.

Do you think I support qanon? I mean I know you only speak idiot, but perhaps you could try English?

I had to look up what that acronym means, and still don't understand how that applies to me. But, okay? I guess?

I agree. Any father that runs away abandoning his child in the car is a monster.

Again. AFTER Minnesota gave them no choice.

Minnesota put out immediate prejudicial and inflammatory statements to try and gain immediate control of the narrative.

You don't think this administration of any was going to answer that power play?

It was stupid in their part. They should have just said they were waiting for all the facts.

80 almost a day AFTER the buffoons in Minnesota gave them no choice by trying to control the premature narrative Olympics.

Oh please snoofy. Congress intervened and you can't spot the why? Really? You don't think honest congress demands? Maybe she was given a PR bond.

Do you really think you are making some sort of a point?

Do you mean besides the prejudicial and inflammatory statements made within HOURS of the shooting? No thanks.

71: 37 years at the federal and state level.

Because then government of Minnesota has shown demonstrably that they can't be trusted.

I don't remember enough about the Castile case to be able to say. I'll have to look it back up.

And to answer your questions: I have never had the need to discharge my firearm on duty as a law enforcement officer.

George Floyd was 100% murdered. Ashli Babbitt was absolutely legally shot by the officer an ore than that RIGHTFULLY shot.

The crime of the bad check predicated their attention. They are detained and awaiting an immigration judge because they don't have legal immigration status.

Glad I could clear that up for you.

Snooty. Please. You do know there is a difference between federal and state court. I don't want the state of Minnesota anywhere near it. I trust the FBI far more than them.

The Ausa will decide whether or not to send it to grand jury.

I was ABH here since 2004ish ... but when I changed computers this last time I didn't bring over my old password and I couldn't get it reset so I just made a new account.

Glad I could satisfy your curiosity.

46. I have far more experience and expertise than you. But that's fine.

43 thank you for proving my point. She was arrested not for the bad checks ... she was in the city illegally. She thinks her marriage should protect her from deportation. That's true..,

If you apply for it. Why didn't she apply the second she got married and gain legal status? Why is she only indignant steer the fact, when forethought works have prevented this from becoming a problem. She can plead her case to an immigration judge. She has enough mitigating factors that he might well decide in her favor.

But that doesn't mean she shouldn't have fine the paperwork eight years ago.

What's the phrase? "A lack of planning on your part doesn't constitute an emergency on anyone else's part."

41. Jesus. I never said SHOULD have been killed. I said he was legally justified in doing so. It's willfully ignorant to conflate the two.

The right thing to do and the legally acceptable thing to do are UNRELATED. They often go hand in hand, but not always.

I understand use of force, case law in deadly force, and policy and procedure better than 99.9% of the population.

We arent doing that. We are detaining them for the violation of being in the country illegally, and putting them in front of an immigration judge. They could have requested asylum within a year after crossing the border illegally ... . But if they didn't, can you give me a reason why they Shouldn't see an immigration judge?

That's the funny part. I'm not. I never voted for him. Never will.

But I don't have to view this through political eyes like you.

You do realize some humans have the capacity to judge effects on their merits, not based on what political party they prefer.

The amount of "I hate Trump and he loves ice so I have to hate ice" is hilarious.

28. True. Half a day after the mayor, the police chief, and the governor were calling him a murderer.

If they had just said they were "troubled by the days events, add we look forward to a thorough investigation into the matter" like they should have, the administration may have not countered with their narrative.

I wouldn't trust any investigation chaired by investigators in Minnesota. Not a chance. Bring in some impartial investigators from a disinterested state to run a concurrent investigation would be a much smarter idea.

Or ... the request to investigate wasn't made in good faith.

The governor, the mayor, and the chief of police in Minneapolis made egregiously biased and inflammatory statements within a blink of an eye after the shooting.

I wouldn't trust them to be impartial for ANY reason.

What I would like is an independent concurrent investigation, from an impartial state like Arizona or Colorado for example.

Minnesota clearly can't be trusted.