Mr censorship is still running with the evidence free narrative, I see.

What kind of moron needs a fridge with a screen anyway?

Thats like boaz and his stupid app connected digital faucet lol

Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris... on lines 1, 2, 3, and 4 for you.

Who cares.

Bringing up science in the context of a Creator is rubbish. Leave it to a mathematician (not science) and "science philosopher" (definitely not science) to go there.

#52 | Posted by horstngraben

100%.

They're really trying to milk this for all it's worth.

They've probably used up it's usefulness. I don't suspect these cynical ploys to do much.

The dollar is in free fall?

#20 | Posted by humtake

"Buuuttttt theyyy did it toooooooooo"

What a f*&^ing moron.

Sad trombone.

#18 | Posted by visitor_

Another "constitutional conservative" piece of s(*& weighs in.

He talked on a podcast.
What did he formally do with regard to ABC, Sinclair, Nexstar, etc?

#147 | Posted by eberly

And for my next trick, I'm going to act as if the head of the FCC making pointed statements about networks and who they support isn't seen as a warning to be acted upon by people whose only concern is shareholder value!

-ebtuse

He's Nostradamus 2.0.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger

No, he's just an authoritarian/fascist that you gleefully voted for and enthusiastically support even now.

Have you started wiping your a*& with pages from your beloved pocket Constitution yet? You're doing it figuratively; you might as well start doing it literally.

Encourage the likes of community notes and trust its citizens to call out obvious BS.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger

Except idiots like you fall for it. Every time.

The reason people like you get all pissy about 'cradle to the grave gubmint' and whine about how you don't need it is because you know, deep down, that you actually do need it and it pisses you off.

You've been given tons of evidence. Twitter files.

The twitter files were a bust, tiger.

Merely the beginning of Musk ingratiating himself with the maga moron crowd because he saw opportunity and $$.

Meanwhile, Trump LITERALLY STATES HE's WEAPONIZING the Justice Department, and you don't make a peep.
STFD and STFU.

#13 | Posted by Danforth

I wish I had more than one NW flag to give for my country.

And, so did Charlie Kirk, and the Left killed him for it

#6 | Posted by Maverick

GFY idiot.

You are such a pathetic troll. You actively cheered a censorship regime for 4 years. Shut up and sit in the corner and feel shame.

Still pushing this bulls*&^ line.

Sorry to inform you, but your team, the people you voted for, are participating in actual censorship. The type the 1A is meant to prevent.

You're responsible for far more actual censorship than any librul here, sport.

and the term can be applied to anyone who opposes fascism in any of its forms.

Which is likely the point.

This will raise an uncomfortable position, though, when they start going after their critics as "antifa," essentially admitting they're fascists.

My concern is that we're sliding from comedy into a kind of speech-policing that feels uncomfortably McCarthyesque.
I'm not saying I believe this to be true, but I do wonder who's next.

#19 | Posted by BillJohnson

Your last line is contradictory.

It is happening. This is actual government censorship that people like ballwasher always claimed to be against.

And it's yet another example of Trump being exactly what we said he would be while you idiots convinced yourself he wouldn't be and voted for him.

And ICE posted an ominous warning on social media to stop resisting

Especially given their ridiculous definition of resist and assault...

Charlie Kirk did one debate, at Oxford, against professionals with a moderator. He got his ass kicked, badly.

#3 | Posted by sitzkrieg

I'm gonna have to look for that on Youtube.

Liar.

#86 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Nope.

It went on for years.

Even led to nonsense like Pizzagate.

So shove it, pedo. We always assumed your accusations were admissions as they usually are.

Don't stop there. You have two more names in your protocol.

Hitler and Nazi. Go on. You know you want to.

#66 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

You were the stupid f^*%s who called everyone pedo for about a year and a half when you were srupid enough to believe it was only Dems and LiBruLz in the list.

Now you defend the pedos when it's clear your boy is a central player.

So GFY, pedo.

20 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Found the pedo.

Apparently pedos always stick together.

Many of Hitler's people were terrifyingly competent.
I take from that the Hitler was more self-confident than Trump.
Boy, if Donald hears that it's going to piss him the hell off.

#3 | Posted by Zed

If this administration goes through a Hunger Games period like Hitler's regime did, I suspect the competency will go up quite a bit.

But then again, Hitler really believed the extreme views on race and nationality that he acted upon and so did the people who were in his inner circle.

Trump is just a thief using the power of the state to enrich himself, to control people for as long as possible to allow maximal enrichment and to keep himself out of jail. God help us if the true believers fully take over.

You do know that's now how it works, right?

#19 | Posted by boaz

You do know that you have no idea how it works, right?

Great Corky,
Now do Leviticus 18:22!

#4 | Posted by boaz

Only a fake Christian who doesn't know what they're following cites the Old Testament as justification for their behavior.