Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

Miranda7

Subscribe to Miranda7's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Thursday, November 28, 2024

Democrats long believed that the diversifying of the country would lead to their party's long-term success, but President-elect Trump was able to win over many of the voters Democrats believed they could rely on. read more


Comments

First of all, I have said this before, the "Blue Wall of Silence" is mostly TV and Movie fiction. In real life, good cops don't want to work around bad cops. We depend on each other to stay alive, uninjured and out of trouble. When we identify a "bad apple" in the barrel, we want him (or her) gone. Cops rat each other out all the time. That is how most misconduct is exposed, through IN-ternal complaints. When these kinds of stories come out, we are all embarrassed and upset, because it reflects on the entire profession.

Secondly, Municipal police chiefs are appointed and answer to an elected mayor as well as a city council which often includes a public safely oversight committee. Elected county sheriffs answer directly to their constituencies, and a county commission level oversight often exists as well.

Thirdly, the State Attorneys Office overseas investigations of police officers whenever a crime is alleged

Fourthly, FDLE and FHP often step in or are called in to take over an investigation whenever local police are implicated

Fifthly the Bureau of Criminal Justice Standards in Tallahassee reviews all citizen complaints at the state level and acts to strip officers of their certifications

Sixthly the DOJ acts at the federal level to investigate local law enforcement whenever a violation of rights is alleged

Seventhly, Florida has a broad sunshine law. Nearly all governmental records are open to public inspection and review. This includes citizen complaints, officers training and work history, investigations of misconduct, reports written, calls for service, body camera footage, written reports, radio transmissions, emails, texts messages, etc. Journalists, the ACLU and other citizens groups make frequent use of these resources.

So yeah......that is not enough, what we REALLY need is to select a group of random hairdressers, computer programmers, pet groomers, teachers, community organizers, cashiers etc..... to investigate and apply their "expertise" to make sure officers are held accountable. While they are convened, maybe we should get the same "citizens oversight committee" to review malpractice claims against doctors, determine the cause of airplane crashes, approve new medications and verify that buildings are constructed to meet hurricane codes!

Yes, corruption and bad groups of cops exist, but it is the exception not the norm. Citizen oversight committees are not the answer. If the seven levels of oversight described above can't root it out, a group of regular folks meeting at the community library once a month isn't going to break the case.

One of the things I have always admired about Obama was his willingness to talk to our enemies. Some insight:

mediate.com
www.nbcnews.com

I'd like to think that Obama has the wisdom to recognize that if he leaves that door of communication open, Trump will pick up the phone when he calls and may just listen to what Barack has to say at some critical moment for America. Fitting to see this at Jimmy Carters funeral.

#33 Chuffy,
I do care about you and your family. And I do reject DJT and elements of BOTH parties. I believe a multi-party system is essential for balance. I am not a Republican, but I can't "join you" when you post the kind of hyperbolic, over the top rhetoric like this:

Repubicans support, if not enthusiastically cheer, the following, openly:

Rape, sexual assault and men beating up women.
Six year olds getting shot in the face.
Adultery.
Child abuse.
Treason.
Fascism.
White Supremacists.
Religious theocracy.
Anti-science stupidity.

It's a longer list, but all of those things are the core beliefs of Repubicans. They love all of it.

I really don't see the point of piling on to the endless threads here that are filled with that kind of divisive content to prove some sort of fealty. I prefer to stick with factual posts from my area of expertise, and call out false or misleading stories. Disrupting false narratives makes people uncomfortable. Is it more comfortable for you to believe that roughly 50% of Americans support (if not enthusiastically cheer) six year olds getting shot in the face?

So that was my response to your "if you really cared about my family" comment. My work has exposed me to a very diverse population and my concern for other people is not conditional on political beliefs. I sincerely believe that most people are decent and caring, they just disagree on how to make the world a better place. I hope you and your family continue to stay safe. My family members are between the Sunset and Eaton fires and keeping watch. Air quality is terrible, but they are essential workers and can't leave. They feel very fortunate to be safe.

Very likely you are all at least partly right. A CHS is not an employee or a 1099 contractor. A CHS is basically a registered snitch, part of the general population who associates with criminals. Sometimes they are given nominal cash payments, but most of them seem to thrive on the attention and information they get from law enforcement. Per policy, they are NEVER authorized to break the law or encourage others to do so, but if they do, they are likely to receive leniency in recognition of whatever assistance they have provided. Their presence in the crowd should not be surprising or controversial.

I don't believe FBI Agents infiltrated these groups and directed the incursion, or that agents committed cries. I also don't believe the FBI didn't at least have a plainclothes presence in the crowd that day. If they didn't they failed us. In my DC days the FBI (and other Feds) popped up all over the place in protest activities. Sometimes we took them to jail to protect their cover. In all cases we were not permitted to include any information about their presence in our reports, something we took umbrage with.

The FBI is secretive to a fault, and the careful phrasing of the Inspector General reflects that. "We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6". Note they limited their analysis to materials and testimony they "reviewed". The FBI could have withheld or redacted materials and restricted certain personnel from testifying for a myriad of reasons the IG would have found acceptable. Transparency is not one of the FBI's core values. Secondly, FBI personnel would only be considered "undercover" if they had established fictitious identities and developed relationships with conspirators. Anonymous personnel mixing with the crow would be considered "plainclothes" not "undercover".

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable