#7 | Posted by ScottS

JFC you're dumb, a racist, and a cultist.

Swallow it.

And Pres Trump makes excuses for Pres Putin?
#6 | Posted by LampLighter

According to Trump, it was just a mistake. Just like so many of the deportations...simple mistakes.

Whoops!

#71 | Posted by itchyp

Now you cultists are just making ---- up. Keep bending, Trump approves of your efforts.

#44 | Posted by fortfisher

You're in a cult. And you prove it every day.

Swallow it.

The statement, "He entered this country illegally, He was denied asylum in 2019. Go back and come back the legal way," is only partially accurate and omits key context regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case.

**What is accurate:**
- **Entry:** Kilmar Abrego Garcia did enter the United States illegally around 2011[3][8][6].
- **Asylum Denial:** In 2019, an immigration judge denied his application for asylum because he did not file within the required one-year period after arrival[3][8].

**What is misleading or inaccurate:**
- **Legal Status Since 2019:** Although his asylum request was denied, the same immigration judge granted Garcia "withholding of removal" status in 2019[8][6]. This is a form of legal protection that allows someone to remain in the U.S. if they would likely face persecution or harm in their home country. This status made his presence in the U.S. legal, and he was issued a work permit. He lived and worked legally in Maryland from 2019 until his mistaken deportation in 2025[8][6].
- **Deportation Error:** Garcia was not deported as a routine consequence of his denied asylum. He was mistakenly deported in March 2025 despite the judge's order protecting him from removal to El Salvador[1][6][8]. The U.S. government has acknowledged this was an "administrative error"[1][6][8].
- **"Go back and come back the legal way":** This advice ignores the fact that Garcia was already granted legal protection to remain in the U.S. due to the risk of harm if returned to El Salvador. He was not simply someone without legal status; he was a legal resident under a specific immigration protection[8][6].

**Key Context**
- Garcia was never charged with a crime in the U.S. or El Salvador, despite government claims of gang affiliation, which his attorneys and a judge found unsubstantiated[3][8].
- He was married, had U.S. citizen children, and complied with all legal requirements during his protected status[8].
- The Supreme Court ordered the U.S. government to facilitate his return after the wrongful deportation[1][3][4][5].

**Conclusion**
The statement omits the crucial fact that Garcia was legally protected from deportation and was only sent to El Salvador due to a government mistake, not because he had no legal right to remain in the U.S. after 2019[8][6][1].

#10 | Posted by gracieamazed

You're about as useless as a screendoor on a submarine, ----.

Swallow it.

#38 | Posted by fishpaw

JFC you're dumb.

#5 | Posted by fishpaw

Nice self-own. LOL

Swallow it.

So, not only is Garcia an unadjudicated criminal, he's also been deemed a terrorist.

told you before, I don't know your ------ coded language - and I don't want to know it.

#322 | Posted by ScottS

I knew there was a reason i liked you!!

#306 | Posted by et_al"

Oh, I see now - you don't understand your own post.
#311 | Posted by ScottS

Eeeeesh. Careful, bro.

So, maybe you can spin your LSAT into a full blown pretend law degree like him.
#307 | Posted by ScottS

Why bother? I've got other means, as already proven.

Define "known"

Pretend you've gone to law school.
#296 | Posted by Danforth

I took the LSAT once. LOL

Also, I really don't want to take the pay cut.
#294 | Posted by ScottS

Aha! Solid! Glad to read you're successful. Sincerely.

48 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2025-04-11 01:05 AM | Reply | Flag: Newsworthy

#286 | Posted by ScottS

Sounds like you'd enjoy being one of said judges. So what's keeping you from recording official interpretations of the constitution as a judge and instead bloviating the exact unofficial, insignificant interpretations on this most august site?

In other words...

If you are illiterate, I don't believe you should vote.
#258 | Posted by ScottS

...your beliefs mean ----. The words and context of the constitution mean everything.

Swallow it.

His posts are simply meant to goad response.
#280 | Posted by ClownShack

He's already convincing racist, that's for sure. To the degree that I question it's a simple troll. Convince me otherwise. I'm open to alternative interpretations.

However, the lack of commonsense is a universal Democrat party trait.
#281 | Posted by ScottS

Then amend the constitution. Until then, you've got nothing and wasting your time even writing the drivel on this most August site.

Are you advocating or just ------------?

If you arrive at the airport without a REAL ID or any other TSA-approved identification, you may still be allowed to fly, but it depends on the circumstances and TSA's discretion. Here's how it works:

1. **Identity Verification Process**:
- If you lack proper ID, TSA officers may initiate an identity verification process. This involves providing personal information such as your name, current address, and other details to confirm your identity[1][3].
- You may be required to present secondary documents (e.g., a birth certificate or Social Security card) or answer questions about your identity[5].

2. **Additional Screening**:
- If your identity is successfully verified, you will undergo additional security screening, including a pat-down and thorough inspection of carry-on items[1].

3. **Risk of Denial**:
- If TSA cannot confirm your identity or if you decline to cooperate with the process, you will not be allowed to proceed through security or board the flight[1][3].

While this process provides an avenue for flying without approved ID, it is not guaranteed and can be time-consuming. It is strongly recommended to secure a REAL ID or alternative form of identification before traveling to avoid complications.

Commonsense doesn't matter.
#273 | Posted by rstybeach11"
Yes, the Democrat party proves this on a daily basis.
#276 | Posted by ScottS

Democratic party adheres to the constitution, you fascist, racist, cultist... Unlike you, Trump, and the rest of your cult.

Swallow it.

It doesn't. It has to do with commonsense.
#271 | Posted by ScottS

Commonsense doesn't matter. The constitutional rights for every US citizen is what matters. Hilarious you'd make this connection. Even worse, some of those folks that are FAR below your bar of intelligence voted for your cult. And yet here you are, complaining about the Blacks being too dumb to vote.

You're the irony this thread truly required. Thank you for providing.

Now, swallow.

Why doesn't Nvidia hire people that can't do basic math to design their chips? Because those people bring nothing to the table in furthering the design.
#262 | Posted by ScottS

Explain what that has to do with the Constitution.

We'll wait.

Oh, but wait, there's more!