This is a weird movie we're living in. People were saying the First Lady was effectively running the show when Biden was President (at least towards the end), and now the same appears to be true under the current admin.

The map isn't "lying". Historically, the Mercator projection has had pragmatic uses when it comes to navigation and mapping. While I agree with the sentiment of trying to educate people about how it can be misleading to people aren't mathematically inclined and never thought about it before, the headline of this article is dumb clickbait that makes people dumber.

"There's a North Korea and a South Korea,"

Exactly my point. We don't call just one of them "Korea". But we ignore that there's a P.R.China and R.O.China.

"You want to say there's one Carolina? One Dakota?"

Whenever we have 3somes, yes.

"China"

China is like Korea. There isn't just one. But for some reason, we pretend like there is.

Who cares? Why are you posting this crap as if it's some sort of scandal? Shocker, someone at a hearing brought notes! One might think you're posting this nonsense to dilute valid criticisms. Or just mindlessly forwarding whatever appears on your feed.

"Christian churches have evolved. The same will be expected of Muslim churches."

Have you ever been near a Muslim church/mosque/religious center? I lived close to ones in two smaller cities. Never heard a peep from them, since they always followed noise ordinances, unlike many of the churches. Of course, YMMV by location, but it seems like you have a very skewed idea of what Muslims are like in the same way some people do about Jews and Christians based on a small sample.

"I have some Bad News for your George Floyd comparisons!"

How about Babbit -> Michael Brown and Floyd -> Charlie Kirk?

I know a woman who is bisexual and has talked openly about guys she's had sex with, but she identifies as "gay". So I guess it depends if you're talking about someone's identity labels or actual orientation.

Surprising that Just ----- Whipped only started drunk posting this late in the day.

ICE is being misused by the current admin. Your response? "Abolish ICE! Defund the police!" The same crap that got this administration elected.
"Give me a break."
You don't deserve one.
#13 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-10-09 09:41 AM

"Why do you support ICE not allowing United States children to contact adult relatives who could take care of them?"

Do you mean like Elian Gonzales?

"If Ashli Babbitt listened to the cop that told her multiple times to stop, she'd be alive. Who did she think she was? Michael Brown?"

I was just about to make this exact comparison. It's rather inconvenient for the clowns on both the left and the right in this thread.

"I think most of the people here oppose the use of masks because they perceive that it does complicate the targeting accountability of ICE officers."

Again, you kids can't have it both ways. You rightly complained when they doxed jurors and judges who ruled against them, as well as protestors. There are people who want to dox ICE officers simply for being ICE.

"Ice agents are just following Dem's covid protocol,"

The apostrophe should go after the "s" when using possessive plurals. Otherwise, it looks like you're talking about an individual whose proper name is "Dem".

If anyone's interested, I'm offering proper English lessons via Zoom. All political affiliations accepted.

"Some judge from Edisto Beach SC on line #1 for you. She s got a "hot take" on your position."

That supports my point, actually.

"It's not a problem.
They should be doxed."

If you truly believe that, then you shouldn't feign outrage when the other side uses doxing to intimidate and physically endanger their opponents.

"Judges, Prosecutors, and Law Enforcement are all known. They don't get to hide who they are."

They will if people keep targeting them with violence.

'I like "doxxing" better.'

Do you pronounce it 'doksksing'?

Just because something is common, doesn't mean it's correct.

Like misusing the word 'literally'. The English langage is literally raped every time someone does that.

"Protecting whom?"
"Whom is at risk from ICE."

The first sentence is a correct use of "whom", because it's the object. The second is not.

"WEARING THE MASKS is what endangers ICE.
It marks them as consciously adopting the role of enemy."
#7 | Posted by Zed

You're as nutty as the anti-maskskers.

"I'm resisting."

Make sure you shout that loud and clear when they tase you.

"ICE are goons."

ICE is being misused by the current admin. Your response? "Abolish ICE! Defund the police!" The same crap that got this administration elected.

"Give me a break."

You don't deserve one.

"I'm not."

You are. By advocating doxing (the correct spelling), you are contributing to the very problem that you are bitching about.

"ICE needs to be doxxed [sic]."

You can't have it both ways. If you don't want law enforcement to wear masks, you shouldn't give them a reason to.

"And yet, throughout, I never once saw a soldier or marshal disguising their identity behind a mask. I did some searching this morning on the google machine and, nope, no masks (other than visors on helmets or gas masks for tear gas)."

A counterargument is that doxing (the correct spelling) was not as prevalent nor as easy as it is today.

"Conversion" "therapy" and "gender-affirming" "care" should be treated the same way.

I'm goin' away to Spain when I get my money saved
Gonna start tomorrow

"four in 10 Americans personally know someone who would not elect a woman to the White House"

Or do they just assume those people wouldn't elect a woman because they didn't/don't like any of the options presented so far?