"#14 | Posted by ClownShack"

Tell me which statement is wrong -------. I could replace Democrats with 'militant homosexual Clownshack' and it would still be 100% correct.

Also, you crying about AI is funny - as I said, AI is where liberal talking points go to die. The crying is similar to when you -------s lost control of Twitter.

When the liberals were crying about Trump hurting pharmaceutical company profits by not allowing them to charge 3x more in the US than in Europe - I thought the Democrats had achieved 'peak stupidity' - yet, here we are with the Democrats now crying about Trump hurting Walmart's profit margin.

Who could have ever predicted this?

Dems are now: against removing taxes on tips an OT
Dems are now: pro-war, especially in Ukraine
Dems are now: for pharmaceutical companies reaping windfall profits on the US
Dems are now: against Walmart's profit margin declining to encourage them to move off of nearly all of their products being made in China
Dems are now: for keeping illegal, wife beating gang members in the country
Dems are now: against ANY and ALL cuts to US government spending
Dems are now: against free speech

You have -------- have literally morphed into the 1980's GOP. Congrats.

"Biden went public when he was diagnosed with a skin cancer in 2022.
#84 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY"

In 2022, he was not campaigning for president in the backdrop of people seeing him rapidly deteriorate physically and mentally. If he had disclosed this cancer earlier - the Dems probably would have forced him out of the election before his embarrassing debate performance which pulled back the curtain on his brain being fried.

"#83 | Posted by REDIAL"

If you think an athlete has better doctors than the president of the United States, I can only think that you are on a double-dose of stupid pills.

"#81 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY"

Was your brother examined regularly by the best doctors in the world? You know, the US government goes to the extent of collecting anything the president touches as well as his feces to avoid foreign governments from detecting diseases. And yet - somehow these best in the world ------- doctors missed this cancer from anywhere between 1 - 5 years. Did Biden get the DEI doctor team?

"#77 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

Quoting the Democrat's own words offend you? Here is a hint - the appropriate time to be offended is when the Democrats say something incredibly stupid - not when MAGA later reminds you of what you believed and laughs at you.

"Trump slashed US cancer research by 31 percent
#73 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Should be able to slash it by 100%. Biden said he was going to cure cancer within his term and his term is over so obviously cancer must now be a thing of the past.

No - if we stop illegal immigration and birth rates continue declining with liberal voters, the average US IQ will increase over time.

"Who believes his cancer wasn't known months prior to the election?
#52 | Posted by visitor_"

I would bet 50% of the ------- Dems can read the announcement, check the facts on cancer progression and come to this conclusion - however, I would also bet that 100% of Democrats will chant in cult-like unison that this was not a covered-up regardless of them understanding how ridiculous the defensive of the Democrat narrative becomes.

Joe Biden is getting - AT BARE MINIMUM - yearly extensive health exams and yet, the best doctors in the world missed this cancer growing for 3-5 years until it metastasized to the bones and Democrat -------- don't think this warrants any questions? Even without the 100% proven cover-up of his mental decline, this should be a huge story. In light of the mental decline cover-up, it should ring out as a giant conspiracy in which Democrats lied straight to the stupid smug faces of their ------- liberal cult members because they knew you would accept their story even if they are caught red handed. And you know what? They were 100% correct as proven by the comments on this thread.

The time it takes to metastasize to the bone is 5-7 years from what I read. In short, Biden and his doctors knew about this for years and lied about it. At this point, just add it to the lies about his mental health.

"#2 | Posted by jpw"

Trump is a 1990's style Democrats - that is why I vote for him. I would not for a pre-MAGA GOP or the currently insane version of the Democrat party. Apparently, a majority of the country agrees with me. The better question for you - if you supported those policies 25 years ago when they were put forth by Democrats - why you do condemn Trump now for it?

You sound like the GOP when Clinton was president. 'He keeps on stealing our ideas' they shouted in anger. Well, your ideas were being implemented - you should be happy unless it is recognition you wanted all along and not the policies themselves.

Liberals are quick to defend the US Constitutional rights for illegal, wife beating illegal gang members and other assorted rapists and murders - but them defending the US Constitutional rights for law abiding US citizens is a bridge too far for them.

"Republicans have been trying to loot the Treasury since Reagan .... With Trump they finally figured out a way to do it.
#15 | Posted by snoofy"

What the ---- are you talking about -------? At most, GOP just wants the US government to take less of their money in taxes. Meanwhile - Democrats are stealing US government money through scams like USAID. The parties are not the same.

"#10 | Posted by REDIAL"

Given that 2 out of the 3 major credit rating agencies have downgraded our debt already - one for almost 15 years and one 2 years ago - you tell me what you think the fallout is going to be from this action? Is it going to be a like a corporation where their borrowing rates will increase by 100-200bps overnight? No - IT WILL HAVE NO IMPACT. If you are dumb enough to even believe that the Moody's rating has ANY impact on the interest rate paid by the Fed, you have not been paying attention.

"We're so much in trouble. It will take a generation to dig us out of the Trump era.
#5 | Posted by LauraMohr"

Clearly you are speaking on behalf of the Democrat party and not the US as a nation. Yes, it will take a generation or more for the Democrats to dig itself out of the hole it has dug. The problem for Democrats - YOU KEEP DIGGING. You have received flashing red lights from your voters that your policies are wrong and not wanted by even your own party and you keep doubling down. You are misinterpreting the voters shouting STOP THE WOKE, COMMUNIST NONSENSE as 'you are not going woke, communist fast enough!"

Moody's was the last one of the major agencies to downgrade - so, this is kinda meaningless. Usually, contracts setting interest rates based on US government already referred to a majority of the agencies so this will have no impact on them as that condition was already met. As for the US debt itself, it does not trade based on Moody's rating so this is 100% symbolic only. I do find it funny that Moody's sat quite as a mouse when Biden was planning to add trillions in debt through loan forgiveness and was running spending at 50% higher than pre-covid levels despite him touting the economy is fully recovered. Also, I find it strange they time this now when Trump is the first president since Clinton to actually try to reduce government spending based on 'growing debt'.

They 100% must set up a perjury trap and toss this piece of ---- in jail. That is what he would be doing so give him a taste of his own medicine. Also, I would assume this would now justify lifetime government surveillance and being put on the no-fly list.

"I know you're refuse to believe it, but there have been people pointing out this inevitable outcome for about 30 years. Probably longer. That's just as long as I could see this inevitable outcome.
#9 | Posted by jpw"

Great. Given that, I am sure you supported implementing these exact measures 30 years ago. Why are you now against them? It is you that has changed - not the idea.

"Give gaslighter never answers questions, no one need respond to this alias trolling.
#66 | Posted by oneironaut"

Yep - I said as much. I don't believe in blocking people but I don't see a need to ever respond to him again unless he drastically increases the quality of his posts and thought process.

"No it really doesnt only with Google Search does this happen, but AI doesn't put up with the technique you use.
#19 | Posted by oneironaut"

Exactly - which is why I say that AI is where liberal ideas go to die because you can actually test them with data.

Here is the liberal game they been playing for the last 20 years.

Academia has been overrun by liberals - these professors do studies that align with their liberal bias by manipulating data and publish headlines. As these studies are technically 'peer reviewed' (despite having a very poor replication rate), they get picked up in the top of the search engine based on the published headlines which the liberals then use to 'fact check' and shut down debate.

Those days have ended. AI can go directly into their reported data so people can see the manipulations that they have done and why these 'studies' are so unreliable and cannot be reproduced.

Search engines like Google have become absolute garbage as a tool now because it just links you to these headlines and buries anything that is even remotely controversial. Good look finding an article that was posted 3 months ago - much less 3 years ago even using exact words from the article. AI has changed the game for those using it as an enhanced search engine and tool to gather data for analysis - it is less well equipped to do original analysis without given exact prompts - but that is still the usage liberals still mainly use.

"As in, get the results you want.
#14 | Posted by REDIAL"

As in 'refining the search to remove the cherrypicked scenario the liberal researcher used to publish their garbage report'. Again, you will not understand this as you accept everything at the headline level and then turn your brain off.

I will give you an example based on another discussion I had (not on this website) - what is the failure rate for public to private companies via PE vs. a public sample that was not bought by PE.

Do the basic analysis and tell me what it states based on the available 'research'. Then, think critically if the parameters used accurately represent the scenario that you requested.

"Incels have given up thinking, and they're proud of it.
#13 | Posted by ClownShack"

LOL - the EXACT OPPOSITE. You ------- liberals just use a Google search to find a headline that vaguely supports your point but never dig beyond it to actually understand the issues.

With AI - YOU DEFINE the query - you are not just parroting other's work without thinking. That is how liberals use AI for your school work - which is why you are getting dumber. You simply ask AI to do the assignment vs. asking it to provide unique queries to test and prove and then refine your own theories.

"Ai will give you whatever answer you want it to.
It's no different than a search engine.
#10 | Posted by ClownShack"

LOL. You clearly do not understand how to run queries on AI. Google only links to studies that have been published - if you want to do an adjusted analysis, it is impossible using just a search engine.

Just refer to the medical thread I just posted to - those are not the type of analysis you can do with Google unless you are collecting the raw data on each study and then cross analyzing it yourself.

"#7 | Posted by ClownShack"

I use AI in place of Google to grab statistics as Google is corrupted. Google is about giving an answer or links without providing details behind the analysis - with the intention to give a biased result.

Things like Grok allow you to quickly run statistics based on your own queries - it is akin to doing database queries based on your own parameters. It is fantastic - but, literal poison for liberal ideas because they cannot be supported by actual data.