Was there something incorrect in the article?
#23 | Posted by visitor_

The thing that's missing is... what difference any of it makes.
You're not man enough to allege this changed the election, so what points are you hoping to score here?

ICE WITHHELD MEDICAL CARE FROM A DIABETIC MAN. HE DIED. THEN THEY MARKED HIM AS "RELEASED."
x.com
#17 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

Republicans are satisfied with that outcome.

As this case shoes, it doesn't matter if you have your papers.

ICE is arresting American citizens for not looking American, and Republicans are happy about it and think Trump is doing the right thing.

"We know who is on those boats, we've been tracking them from the very beginning. We know everything about them, okay?"

Then you ought to be able to share that information with us, Little Marco.

Who did we kill, what were their roles in the drug trade?

Is Boaz actually beginning to entertain the notion that all the allegations against Trump are true?

I figured Boaz simply didn't care one way or the other.

Owning the libs and stacking the Supreme Court is worth grooming and turning out any number of fifteen year old white girls.

If I'm wrong about that, I'll be very surprised.

Dying in custody is a feature, not a bug.

Not a single Republican will condemn this.

I mean Republicans in Congress; I'm not talking about Republican here, who also won't condemn this.

Zero evidence has ever been produced that Thomas engaged in any quid pro quo.
#79 | Posted by BellRinger

I guess Supreme Court votes aren't evidence...
If those aren't evidence, it sure seems like nothing is evidence.

Maybe you can give us real examples of Republicans taking bribes, so we can know what the standard of proof is here.

"He complied with all disclosure rules as they existed at the time of his friend's generosity."

That doesn't mean it can't be bribery.

That's like saying Donald Trump didn't rape Ivanka, because under the legal definition of Rape in New Jersey at the time, a man couldn't be charged with rape when the victim is his wife.

But you and I both understand that legal rape is still rape.

Just like you and I both understand that legal bribery is still bribery.

"the Left just keeps siding with Illegals over citizens"

Who is ICE siding with when they arrest American citizens?

Michael Wolff's Account: According to author Michael Wolff, Trump himself reported Epstein to the police in 2004, an episode that remained in the shadows for years.
#58 | Posted by boaz

How long had Trump and Epstein been diddling girls by then?
At least a decade, Boaz.

We can't go on with a Supreme Court that has such contempt for both the Constitution and stare decisis. It is destroying our society and even many rightwingers are beginning to understand that.
#78 | Posted by moder8

And that's why actual DR people
with actual conservative beliefs
don't post serious comments
on these threads.

"They want to burn down the system whenever they don't get their way."

Like rejecting the very idea that Supreme Court precedents ought to be given special consideration because they serve as a system of stability in our society.

Like rejecting the idea that it would be wrong for Mike Pence to use his power as President of the Senate to override the will of the voters in an election.

Those are just two of the things Republicans have already burnt down.

"Those who support the recent overturning of precedents believe that they're just as morally justified."

And the people who ratted out Anne Frank thought they were morally justified.
And the police who took Anne Frank away thought they were morally justified.

Morally justify that.

What happened in Minnesota has a price tag of $250M. ICE has a budget of $75B. ICE costs three hundred times more than the MN food stamp fraud.

If just one percent of ICE spending is fraud, waste, and abuse, that's three times the cost of the entire Minnesota fraud.

And if you don't think sending people to camps for weeks on end instead of simply putting them on the next flight out isn't fraud, waste, and abuse, you're too ignorant to have this conversation.

Can someone explain to me why you progressives on this blog are not pissed about the Muslim/Somali fraud on our government in MN?
#37 | Posted by boaz

To put things in perspective:
There's a hundred times more expensive fraud happening in the White House.
A fraud that is also causing structural damage to the nation which will persist for decades.

What ICE is doing is bringing down GDP by about one percent.
Can you explain why you aren't pissed about that?

"They want to burn down the system whenever they don't get their way."

Like when the South seceded from the Union?

Maybe you guys should ask the Blue states to leave, or just kick us out, since you think it's the Blue State people who are bringing you down.

Every policeman and politician should be given LSD in a controlled setting and then have to answer questions.

If a MLB pitcher can pitch a no-hitter on LSD, who knows, maybe it's right to say LSD is a performance enhancing drug.

The Cruelty Is The Point.

The GOP is a Death To Children Cult.

a prison jumpsuit.
If that wasn't clear.
#11 | Posted by horstngraben

...stops asking ChatGPT to draw Ghislaine Maxwell as Catwoman before specifying Lee Merriweather or Eartha Kitt...

"Political parties have a hard time getting ahead of public opinion."

That's why they manufacture public opinion through propaganda.

And now you know ... the rest of the story.

(Hoping you're old enough to remember Paul Harvey.)

is an EO all it takes?

Could an EO legalize acid?

Like his idea to re-open Alcatraz. The night after Escape From Alcatraz was on TV.

It's not a gaffe, it's math illiteracy.

At long last, Math Illiteracy has a representative in the White House!

That's some weapons grade DEI.