Speak,
The bill was inadequate.
Democrats placed too much emphasis on increasing the government's ability to process more illegal immigrants rather than preventing illegal entry in the first place.
It contained some enforcement measures and allowed for a temporary border closure under certain conditions.
It did not attempt to permanently secure the border, which was a deal breaker.
You have a lot of conceptions.
Just stop telling yourself lies.
Dems are blind.
#121 | Posted by BillJohnson
"permenently secure" has no meaning in reality. No border is totally secure and nothing is permanent.
Here's the reality, which you will ignore because your entire life is about ignoring reality:
"Key Results of the Bill
1. The "Emergency Border Authority" (The Shutdown Trigger)The most talked-about feature was a new emergency mechanism that would temporarily "shut down" the border to most asylum seekers if crossings hit specific thresholds: Discretionary Trigger: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could activate the shutdown if border encounters averaged 4,000 per day over a week. Mandatory Trigger: The shutdown would become mandatory if encounters averaged 5,000 per day over a week, or hit 8,500 in a single day. The Impact: When activated, anyone crossing between official ports of entry would be immediately deported without the opportunity to ask for asylum. Given the crossing numbers at the time, this authority likely would have been active almost immediately upon signing.
#9 | Posted by john_savage2
If your opponent is truly evil, you don't need to lie to make then seem terrible.
The only accurate thing you said is that trump is a pedophile.