#7 | Posted by JeffJ

Are you, or are you not, the Drudge Retort poster known as JeffJ, who was thrown off of the Retort and had to come crawling back as "Bellringer"?
Are you brave enough to respond?
Or, are you just a typical MAGA coward?

(JeffJ has me plonked. So, while he can't see my posts, I can see his. And everyone else can see this response... but he can't! Which means he won't respond, making him look like he really is JeffJ! - lather, rinse, repeat...)

#8 | Posted by Hans

Yes.

Bellringer = JeffJ

"And these Latinos, they love making babies too, just know that. They do. They do. There's no pulling out. They don't do that. They come inside, just like they did to our country. "

"Okay, that's what you guys want. All right. Heck yeah. Cool black guy with a thing on his head. What the hell is that, a lampshade? Look at this guy. Oh my goodness. Wow. I'm just kidding. That's one of my buddies. We had a Halloween party last night. We had fun. We carved watermelons together. It was awesome."

Racism front and center in the Trump campaign.

This is who they are.

Rent moratoriums, federal enhanced unemployment, suspension of payments on student loans, PPP money for businesses (including very small businesses).

Where I was living at the time, unemployment plus the Fed payment put people at over $1000/week in paychecks. A lot of them were people who worked part time at bars and restaurants.

Anyone making $25/an hour could get the same paycheck and never leave home.

#33 | Posted by lfthndthrds

PPP money was from Trump.

But no, for workers, relying on a unemployment paycheck that pays a fraction of your former income even with the enhancement really let people buy $100,000 cars and put down a $50,000 down payment on a new home.

How stupid are you?

That wasn't even the worst thing he said about hispanics.

Dems are taking America on a path to more and more individual dependence on the government and subsequently more power in the hands of the government.

Socialism is only a word.

#87 | Posted by BillJohnson

You know what?

I agree with BillJohnson.

Let's end all handouts for rural communities. For too long rural areas have relied on high tax urban centers to fund their roads, their medical facilities, their utilities, their schools, their law enforcement, etc.

Will these absolutely crush rural, Trump voting areas? Absolutely!

But it's what these rural, Trump voting areas want!

I want Trump to win.

I want him to put these tariffs down.

I can easily afford it.

Trump supporters can't, especially in rural areas. It will be nice to see them suffer from what they wanted.

And the crashing economy will finally bring down home prices.

Illegal immigration is costing America FAAAAAAAAAAAAAR more than any gains but that doesn't stop Dems from wanting to spend that money. I know liberals are run by their egos so they refuse to accept that any opinion they have could have negatives so they won't understand what I'm saying, but that doesn't change reality.

#8 | Posted by humtake

Well that's a lie and the most hypocritical thing ever posted on the DR.

This country would fall apart without the mass illegal immigration we've had. Study after study after real world example proves it.

can only imagine what you'd say if obama had partied with epstein for 15 years. But trump does it and you dont mind at all.

#77 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Fishpaw is jealous of The Donald.

The majority of free thinkers now know what took place in the courtrooms. I hope you enjoy the next 4 years because it's over, Homer.
#66 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Who do FREE THINKERS think won the 2020 election comrade?
#70 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

FREE THINKERS think whatever Trump tells them to think.

Did you even watch her on CNN with Andersen Cooper? The had a one person debate and lost, even Axelrod was saying she was serving up "word salads".

Regarding the topic, all this stuff at the last minute, by either side, won't change the election, everyone sees through it. Its silly this isn't obvious.

#43 | Posted by oneironaut

Fox News has to edit Trump's interviews to make him sound less like a dementia patient...

I'm sorry Harris didn't dance for 45 minutes to her favorite sounds rather than answering questions.

If liberals don't have past, impossible-to-prove allegations against someone...they have nothing. In the absence of sound, logical strategy, it only makes sense they would keep finding people who would do this.

And, I easily ignore (but do not dismiss) when the same thing happens to Dems. Unfortunately for them though, Reps don't have to resort to spontaneous, TDS allegations to get votes like Dems do.

#42 | Posted by humtake

One had a jury trial and proved it.

Do you care? No.

This data is odd and designed to confuse.

The sheer number of arrests versus the low number of convictions is striking.

The numbers lead you to believe in a massive crime wave by illegal citizens and the data tries to hide details.

443,000 non-citizens booked into Texas jails: That includes illegal AND legal, Only 314,000 were illegal. Did they become illegal while being in prison because their VISAs lapsed? Or they were here too long on passport because they were in jail? Green card revoked while in jails? Who knows. Data won't say. You were here on vacation and got arrested for DUI? You're an illegal now!

How many were arrested AT THE BORDER crossing illegally with some other crime? No idea. Data won't say.

Only 200,000 convictions: Wait, so at MOST less than 2/3s were convicted of a crime. But more so, since many convictions include MULTIPLE convictions for different crimes, that number is likely down to 100,000 people or less being convicted.

And it seems a large number were arrested for "All Other Offenses"...like what? Driving without a valid license? Drunk in public?

And this is over a 14 year period and they won't even give us the NUMBER of people convicted or the number that were illegal when they committed their crimes.

Seems like we'd want to deport those ones first when Trump gets back in office.

#1 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Would LOVE to.

But you voted for people who won't let that happen.

Unfortunately you idiots said we have to treat ALL undocumented the same and voted against getting more immigration judges.

So they wills it here for years waiting immigration hearings. Many will be out of jail by the time that happens.

Good job, idiots.

Truth,

Long-term solutions generally create short-term issues to be dealt with.

I'm not saying I agree with all your points but you are correct there is short-term issues generally associated with long term solutions.

That's why people tend to avoid them looking to win elections.

#62 | Posted by BillJohnson

Oh please.

We all know Trump's business partners won't let him put sanctions on China. Unless it's on a product that directly competes with them like electric cars (Musk on line 1).

Trump will do nothing but sit in the oval office and do anything his capitalist buddies want. Crush workers? Yep. Ditch environmental rags? Yep. Tax breaks for the uber rich? Yep. Sanction their sweatshops? Never.

You might be a Nazi if....

But Republicans don't care.

China is going to do their best to balance trade deficits with the countries who pays China's bills - if someone actually forces their hand.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

#1 Not possible to do.
#2 More impossible with many basic materials

Suggestion: Worry about having more healthy babies, eat healthy food and perpetuate a healthy heritage? Forget the politics.

#4 | Posted by Robson

Well genius, being healthy requires access to healthcare...which Planned Parenthood provides.

Also Healthy Heritage? Is that the new slang for White Supremacy?

Deadman,

JUST to put this in perspective...

IF AtlasIntel is right, Trump is in trouble.

Harris picks up Wisconsin, Michigan and North Carolina. And Nevada is a tie currently.

If AtlasIntel has ANY Trump Bias, Harris also wins Nevada and Arizona cleanly.... She only needs one to win. And potentially she wins Georgia and Pennsylvania.

Do you want to keep citing AtlasIntel?

From your own link, which you obviously did not read:

"AtlasIntel was 2020s most accurate pollster
Average error of polls in final 21 days before the 2020 general election, for pollsters that conducted at least 10 polls"

As for accuracy, AtlasIntel's error as 2.2% with a GOP bias of 1% (meaning they missed some in both directions).

Meanwhile, the NYT/Sienna College had an error 5.5% with a Dem bias of 5.5%.

So, everything your wrote, despite you believing it was all the Gospel truth, was WRONG. Worse, it is shown to be wrong in the link YOU CHOSE to prove your argument.

#31 | Posted by deadman

Oh sweetie...you aren't good with numbers are you?

Found the next GOP Presidential Candidate!

Little late

If you want to really dig into numbers...

Traflagar had a 4.9 point GOP lean in 2022 and is currently giving Pennsylvania to Trump by 3. The same lean would mean Harris by 1.9 points.

The New York Times/Sienna College had essentially no lean in 2022. And they have Harris by 4.

The New York Times/Sienna College was the most accurate pollster in 2022, even better than AtlasIntel in 2020.

They had a pretty poor outcome for accurately calling close races.
#24 | Posted by Sycophant
Again, why is it that everything you liberals claim to be the Gospel wrong?
Atlas were statistically the most accurate polls for 2020
images.app.goo.gl

#26 | Posted by deadman

How many races did they call correctly?

It wasn't long after W was in his first term when he tried to privatize SS because he said funds would run out by 2039 (I think, or close to it). Anyone remember what the Dem response was? I do. They fought against it because they said SS wouldn't run out until 2048 (again, can't remember the exact years). That was their sole reasoning!!! Since they didn't agree on the date, they would rather just do nothing. I remember this well because it was one of the first times I remember truly feeling I made the right choice to leave the Dem party.

#27 | Posted by humtake

Your mind must be going.

The Dems argued it was a hand out to Wall Street that would allow Wall Street to gamble with the Social Security fund. How would that have worked out in 2008?

Ok, so now DR lib kids want businesses to be political 100%. All McD's did was say it wasn't going to support either party...exactly what businesses should do imo. But, if you disagree and think every business should have to declare their support of a candidate, when one comes out and says no then why do you automatically take that as them supporting one side or another?

"Kamala claimed, without evidence, to have worked for a short time to pay for college. 100% True.
ACTUALLY, McDonald's has said they have no record of Kamala and the franchise she claimed to work at refuses to comment. 100% True."

100% accurate, although I think it's dumb that we have to argue over something like this when it comes to POTUS candidates. But the fact still remains, she said something and nobody can provide evidence. Regardless of your political affiliation, that's called a lie (until it can be proven). But, Harris has been going on for a while now about Rep lies. And no Dem calls her out on her own lies. And she's made some terrific lies.

#18 | Posted by humtake

Look at the liar.