There is no law that says people must be fed. However, there is one that obligates hospitals to "treat" people that show up on their door steps. Reducing Medicaid payments is just going to deprive hospitals of revenue for treating the indigent which, by federal law, they are obliged to do.

#14 | Posted by FedUpWithPols

And now they will reduce treatment as much as legally possible.

And when we say indigent, we really mean people without health insurance who make less than $80,000 a year because they are least likely to be able to pay their bills.

Why take the risk of providing full treatment if we they can't make up the money elsewhere? Especially with all the for profit hospitals now.

So it begins.

So that's why Trump offered him the job.

He was the district attorney for a county with a population of 16,000. So his competition for district attorney was about 2 other attorneys.

When we look at tax revenues kin's subsidies fossil fuels still pay far more than they receive. Green energy? The opposite.
But, let's keep wasting money and doubling down on bad policy.

#60 | Posted by BellRinger

A good insult - and it was a good one - is no substitute for a sound argument.

#68 | Posted by BellRinger

Apparently it was also a sound argument too because your response was to change the subject.

Jeff gets Fact Checked
Jeff changes the subject.

Nothing ever changes.

#42 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

after years and years of lying....I don't believe any source you use to come up with repeating.

democrat media screwed the pooch as far as cred.....so I don't care....what you say or source you

produce...

do they have a chance to reset ?....sure but my bet is they won't.

#44 | Posted by shrimptacodan

Which backwards Russian AI app are you using to post because the spacing is all weird.

Ending the subsidy is beneficial to Tesla as a whole and harms the Big 3 disproportionately because it makes breaking into the EV space far more costly and time consuming. It's ridiculous that this even has to be explained to you, but then your thinking is dominated by Trump/Elon butt kissing. Logic is wholly absent.

#25 | Posted by Sycophant

You would fail an Econ101 class with that "logic".

#26 | Posted by BellRinger

This isn't rocket science. It's Econ 101 that you obviously don't understand.

Tesla takes a small hit from the loss of the EV tax credit. BUT it ensures they keep a huge market share by stifling competition.

Would you rather lose 5% of sales to elimination of the EV tax credit or 25-40% to competition?

You've never been the smartest person in the room even when you were alone.

I'm pointing out Lamplighter's glaring double standard.

Getting rid of competition? I'm going to bust out the crayons and dumb it down for you.

Tesla's entire fleet is EV's. So that subsidy is applied to every vehicle Tesla sells. Currently, the most profitable vehicles for the big 3 are trucks. That goofy looking cyber truck gets a $7500 advantage over every F150 Ford sells except it's niche Lightning.

Ending the subsidy is beneficial to the Big 3 as a whole and harms Tesla disproportionately because the government mandated advantage it has enjoyed goes away. It's ridiculous that this even has to be explained to you, but then your thinking is dominated by emotion. Logic is wholly absent.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger

No, dummy.

Taking away the EV credit means other automakers can't break into the space and Tesla can ride it's market share.

As for trucks, the Cybertruck is barely a blip in truck sales. TOGETHER they account for only 2.3% of all new pick up trucks sold in the US last year. It's the EV car space that matters.

Ending the subsidy is beneficial to Tesla as a whole and harms the Big 3 disproportionately because it makes breaking into the EV space far more costly and time consuming. It's ridiculous that this even has to be explained to you, but then your thinking is dominated by Trump/Elon butt kissing. Logic is wholly absent.

This shouldn't even be a partisan issue. This should be unacceptable to all of us.

#17 | Posted by BellRinger

"The only solution is to increase their budget again!"
-Republicans

It was an unmitigated disaster. I am having difficulty seeing it rise to the level of being criminal given everyone was simply following orders that came from the top.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger

Yeah, that tends to happen when Trump cuts the withdrawal force from 4,500 to 2,500 against the recommendations of his Generals and releases 5,000 terrorists from prison prior to the withdrawal.

Those two things sound criminal to me.

You mean the woman he raped, that one?

#66 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-11-16 10:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

The one who couldn't remember when it happened? The one who made it clear he didn't "rape" her? The one New York had to change the statute of limitations to be able to prosecute him? The one the jurors ticked the box that said Trump didn't "rape" Ms. Carroll?

#69 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You can always tell who gets their news from 4Chan memes and TikTok.

New York didn't prosecute Trump.

Trump was sued for Defamation.

The Jury found Trump didn't rape her by the definition used. The Judge later indicated it could still be defined under the broad meaning of Rape.

It is nice to see you trusting the Jury though. So obviously you must admit he did it?

Twoothy is clearly an incel and my guess is his wife divorced him for a younger guy she had been banging for years. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why he's THIS miserable and furiously angry.

#81 | Posted by BellRinger

Remember when Bellringer got pissed for people talking about his wife?

Pepperidge Farms remembers

Badoura Township had 82 total votes.

Once again, why can't we trust Trump areas to follow the law?

A rural HEAVY Trump county

Is this for the abusers, the Russian paid assets, or the guy who traffics underage girls?

Non-Commissioned Officer in the National Guard, only reached Major
Claimed COVID was a hoax
7 kids across 3 marriages
Broke the law when running a GOP PAC
Advocated for pardoning War Criminals
Advocated for war with Iran

He's PERFECT for Trump and ShrimpTacoDan. Let's trust him to run a $800 billion office defending the country.

No one stop Trump from nuking a country...or hurricane...

#13 Funny you don't know how posting threads work. When YOU change the 60-character limit in headlines, let me know. Oh, and it was absolutely astounding to me how quickly the LEFT went from distrusting anything the Government did to blindly following along with whatever they said for the last four years. TooTles.

#14 | Posted by gracieamazed

Well gosh...

Maybe it depends who is in charge?

Lying Trump and Lying Bush shouldn't be trusted.

"Iraq has weapons of mass destruction!"

"Sharpie that hurricane! And fire anyone who tells the truth!"

DOJ tells Matt Gaetz that he won't be charged in sex trafficking probe, his lawyers say

#198 | Posted by shrimptacodan

That doesn't mean he didn't do it.

Hell, they were set to release the Ethics Report in two days on it.

And he resigned from office...MONTHS before being confirmed for Attorney General.

I wonder why? (Just Kidding, we all know)

Great idea.

Make one pick everyone hates and can vote against to make your other picks look sane.

This is a good way to ensure a military coup should a Democrat get elected.

Impossible.

I was told the economy is terrible and everyone is broke.

shrimptacodan

Tell me you are against Age of Consent Laws without telling me you are against Age of Consent Laws.

No one is surprised.

Florida needs FEMA? Sorry, we gutted that.
Florida seniors need their Social Security? Sorry, gutted.
Florida seniors need Medicare? Sorry, gutted.
Florida needs their houses repaired? Sorry, illegal immigrants were deported.
#6 | Posted by Sycophant

Is there any state where that wouldn't be just as affected as Florida if those things were to happen?
#7 | Posted by eberly

Florida is a bit unique in its concentration of retirees and hurricanes.

First the racist text to black people and now this.

Trumpers out in force after the election huh?